<!--The Official Report of Parliamentary Debates (Hansard) of the Legislative Council and the House of Assembly of the Parliament of South Australia are covered by parliamentary privilege. Republication by others is not afforded the same protection and may result in exposure to legal liability if the material is defamatory. You may copy and make use of excerpts of proceedings where (1) you attribute the Parliament as the source, (2) you assume the risk of liability if the manner of your use is defamatory, (3) you do not use the material for the purpose of advertising, satire or ridicule, or to misrepresent members of Parliament, and (4) your use of the extracts is fair, accurate and not misleading. Copyright in the Official Report of Parliamentary Debates is held by the Attorney-General of South Australia.-->
<hansard id="" tocId="" xml:lang="EN-AU" schemaVersion="1.0" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xml="http://www.w3.org/XML/1998/namespace" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2007/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="hansard_1_0.xsd">
  <name>House of Assembly</name>
  <date date="2017-02-14" />
  <sessionName>Fifty-Third Parliament, Second Session (53-2)</sessionName>
  <parliamentNum>53</parliamentNum>
  <sessionNum>2</sessionNum>
  <parliamentName>Parliament of South Australia</parliamentName>
  <house>House of Assembly</house>
  <venue></venue>
  <reviewStage>published</reviewStage>
  <startPage num="8357" />
  <endPage num="8453" />
  <dateModified time="2022-08-06T14:30:00+00:00" />
  <proceeding continued="true">
    <name>Question Time</name>
    <subject>
      <name>Royal Adelaide Hospital Construction Site Incidents</name>
      <text id="201702143a9633224cf44298a0001018">
        <heading>Royal Adelaide Hospital Construction Site Incidents</heading>
      </text>
      <talker role="member" id="1804" kind="question">
        <name>Ms CHAPMAN</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">Bragg</electorate>
        <portfolios>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Deputy Leader of the Opposition</name>
          </portfolio>
        </portfolios>
        <questions>
          <question date="2017-02-14">
            <name>Royal Adelaide Hospital Construction Site Incidents</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2017-02-14T15:10:30" />
        <text id="201702143a9633224cf44298a0001019">
          <timeStamp time="2017-02-14T15:10:30" />
          <by role="member" id="1804">Ms CHAPMAN (Bragg—Deputy Leader of the Opposition) (15:10):</by>  My question is to the Attorney-General. Will the Attorney-General assure the house that the withdrawal of workplace safety charges against the Royal Adelaide Hospital contractor, HYLC, and SRG, re the death of Mr Castillo-Riffo was not a term or condition of settlement of the civil dispute between the government and the consortium?</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="627" kind="answer">
        <name>The Hon. J.J. SNELLING</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">Playford</electorate>
        <portfolios>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Health</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for the Arts</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Health Industries</name>
          </portfolio>
        </portfolios>
        <questions>
          <question date="2017-02-14">
            <name>Royal Adelaide Hospital Construction Site Incidents</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2017-02-14T15:11:00" />
        <text id="201702143a9633224cf44298a0001020">
          <timeStamp time="2017-02-14T15:11:00" />
          <by role="member" id="627">The Hon. J.J. SNELLING (Playford—Minister for Health, Minister for the Arts, Minister for Health Industries) (15:11):</by>  Absolutely, and that is an absolutely outrageous allegation. It is a slur upon the independence of SafeWork SA, and to suggest that in any way it would have anything to do with resolving the commercial matters between the government and SAHP is an absolute slander.</text>
        <text id="201702143a9633224cf44298a0001021">In any case, the charges, as I understand it, were against the builder and the builder, HYLC, is not a party to the agreement between the government and SAHP. So, not only is it a slander but it is also materially incorrect.</text>
      </talker>
    </subject>
  </proceeding>
</hansard>