<!--The Official Report of Parliamentary Debates (Hansard) of the Legislative Council and the House of Assembly of the Parliament of South Australia are covered by parliamentary privilege. Republication by others is not afforded the same protection and may result in exposure to legal liability if the material is defamatory. You may copy and make use of excerpts of proceedings where (1) you attribute the Parliament as the source, (2) you assume the risk of liability if the manner of your use is defamatory, (3) you do not use the material for the purpose of advertising, satire or ridicule, or to misrepresent members of Parliament, and (4) your use of the extracts is fair, accurate and not misleading. Copyright in the Official Report of Parliamentary Debates is held by the Attorney-General of South Australia.-->
<hansard id="" tocId="" xml:lang="EN-AU" schemaVersion="1.0" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xml="http://www.w3.org/XML/1998/namespace" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2007/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="hansard_1_0.xsd">
  <name>House of Assembly</name>
  <date date="2017-02-14" />
  <sessionName>Fifty-Third Parliament, Second Session (53-2)</sessionName>
  <parliamentNum>53</parliamentNum>
  <sessionNum>2</sessionNum>
  <parliamentName>Parliament of South Australia</parliamentName>
  <house>House of Assembly</house>
  <venue></venue>
  <reviewStage>published</reviewStage>
  <startPage num="8357" />
  <endPage num="8453" />
  <dateModified time="2022-08-06T14:30:00+00:00" />
  <proceeding continued="true">
    <name>Question Time</name>
    <subject>
      <name>One Community</name>
      <page num="8407" />
      <text id="20170214ace32a38ffab444290001014">
        <heading>One Community</heading>
      </text>
      <talker role="member" id="1804" kind="question">
        <name>Ms CHAPMAN</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">Bragg</electorate>
        <portfolios>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Deputy Leader of the Opposition</name>
          </portfolio>
        </portfolios>
        <questions>
          <question date="2017-02-14">
            <name>One Community</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2017-02-14T15:09:15" />
        <text id="20170214ace32a38ffab444290001015">
          <timeStamp time="2017-02-14T15:09:15" />
          <by role="member" id="1804">Ms CHAPMAN (Bragg—Deputy Leader of the Opposition) (15:09):</by>  My question, again, is to the Premier. Did the Premier have any discussions with Mr Brad Chilcott about the taxpayer funding of One Community?</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="1812" kind="answer">
        <name>The Hon. J.W. WEATHERILL</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">Cheltenham</electorate>
        <portfolios>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Premier</name>
          </portfolio>
        </portfolios>
        <questions>
          <question date="2017-02-14">
            <name>One Community</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2017-02-14T15:09:30" />
        <text id="20170214ace32a38ffab444290001016">
          <timeStamp time="2017-02-14T15:09:30" />
          <by role="member" id="1812">The Hon. J.W. WEATHERILL (Cheltenham—Premier) (15:09):</by>  No, but I understand that Mr Chilcott has come in for some criticism in relation to his very effective campaigning in relation to this matter, and it is no surprise that Senator Birmingham has taken exception to Mr Chilcott's campaigning efforts because they have been effective in embarrassing the federal Liberal government. They have also been very effective in embarrassing Senator Xenophon into shifting his position.</text>
        <text id="20170214ace32a38ffab444290001017">So, don't take it personally. Everybody is getting lobbied. If you want to avoid the pressure, if you want to avoid the embarrassment of cutting $335 million out of schools, reverse the cut or, if you can't reverse the cut, join us in campaigning against it and that might get you off the hook, but, of course, you will never do that because you always put party before the state.</text>
      </talker>
    </subject>
  </proceeding>
</hansard>