<!--The Official Report of Parliamentary Debates (Hansard) of the Legislative Council and the House of Assembly of the Parliament of South Australia are covered by parliamentary privilege. Republication by others is not afforded the same protection and may result in exposure to legal liability if the material is defamatory. You may copy and make use of excerpts of proceedings where (1) you attribute the Parliament as the source, (2) you assume the risk of liability if the manner of your use is defamatory, (3) you do not use the material for the purpose of advertising, satire or ridicule, or to misrepresent members of Parliament, and (4) your use of the extracts is fair, accurate and not misleading. Copyright in the Official Report of Parliamentary Debates is held by the Attorney-General of South Australia.-->
<hansard id="" tocId="" xml:lang="EN-AU" schemaVersion="1.0" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xml="http://www.w3.org/XML/1998/namespace" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2007/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="hansard_1_0.xsd">
  <name>House of Assembly</name>
  <date date="2016-12-01" />
  <sessionName>Fifty-Third Parliament, Second Session (53-2)</sessionName>
  <parliamentNum>53</parliamentNum>
  <sessionNum>2</sessionNum>
  <parliamentName>Parliament of South Australia</parliamentName>
  <house>House of Assembly</house>
  <venue></venue>
  <reviewStage>published</reviewStage>
  <startPage num="8261" />
  <endPage num="8356" />
  <dateModified time="2022-08-06T14:30:00+00:00" />
  <proceeding continued="true">
    <name>Answers to Questions</name>
    <subject>
      <name>Auditor-General's Report</name>
      <text id="201612018be1361aa085425190001513">
        <inserted>
          <heading>Auditor-General's Report</heading>
        </inserted>
      </text>
      <talker role="member" id="1804" kind="question">
        <name>In reply to Ms CHAPMAN</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">Bragg</electorate>
        <portfolios>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Deputy Leader of the Opposition</name>
          </portfolio>
        </portfolios>
        <questions>
          <question date="2016-12-01">
            <name>Auditor-General's Report</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <text id="201612018be1361aa085425190001514">
          <inserted>In reply to <by role="member" id="1804">Ms CHAPMAN (Bragg—Deputy Leader of the Opposition)</by> (3 November 2016).  </inserted>
        </text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="631" kind="answer">
        <name>The Hon. M.L.J. HAMILTON-SMITH</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">Waite</electorate>
        <portfolios>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Investment and Trade</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Small Business</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Defence Industries</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Veterans' Affairs</name>
          </portfolio>
        </portfolios>
        <questions>
          <question date="2016-12-01">
            <name>Auditor-General's Report</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <text id="201612018be1361aa085425190001515">
          <inserted>
            <by role="member" id="631">The Hon. M.L.J. HAMILTON-SMITH (Waite—Minister for Investment and Trade, Minister for Small Business, Minister for Defence Industries, Minister for Veterans' Affairs):</by>  I thank Ms Chapman for her interest in this matter. I have sought advice from the Industry Advocate about the contract referred to on page 55 of the Executive Summary of the Auditor-General's Report. </inserted>
        </text>
        <text id="201612018be1361aa085425190001516">
          <inserted>The Industry Advocate advises me the non-full compliance relates to a cleaning contract issued by TAFE SA that was initially put out to tender as an up to 5-year contract but ultimately awarded for up to 10 years. This caused the potential value of the contract to increase to a different threshold for submission and reporting requirements under the South Australian Industry Participation Policy. </inserted>
        </text>
        <text id="201612018be1361aa085425190001517">
          <inserted>The Industry Advocate advises that, upon discovering this error, TAFE SA contacted the Office of the Industry Advocate and sought advice on how best to ensure compliance. The matter has been resolved to the satisfaction of the Industry Advocate.</inserted>
        </text>
      </talker>
    </subject>
  </proceeding>
</hansard>