<!--The Official Report of Parliamentary Debates (Hansard) of the Legislative Council and the House of Assembly of the Parliament of South Australia are covered by parliamentary privilege. Republication by others is not afforded the same protection and may result in exposure to legal liability if the material is defamatory. You may copy and make use of excerpts of proceedings where (1) you attribute the Parliament as the source, (2) you assume the risk of liability if the manner of your use is defamatory, (3) you do not use the material for the purpose of advertising, satire or ridicule, or to misrepresent members of Parliament, and (4) your use of the extracts is fair, accurate and not misleading. Copyright in the Official Report of Parliamentary Debates is held by the Attorney-General of South Australia.-->
<hansard id="" tocId="" xml:lang="EN-AU" schemaVersion="1.0" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xml="http://www.w3.org/XML/1998/namespace" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2007/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="hansard_1_0.xsd">
  <name>House of Assembly</name>
  <date date="2016-11-30" />
  <sessionName>Fifty-Third Parliament, Second Session (53-2)</sessionName>
  <parliamentNum>53</parliamentNum>
  <sessionNum>2</sessionNum>
  <parliamentName>Parliament of South Australia</parliamentName>
  <house>House of Assembly</house>
  <venue></venue>
  <reviewStage>published</reviewStage>
  <startPage num="8183" />
  <endPage num="8259" />
  <dateModified time="2022-08-06T14:30:00+00:00" />
  <proceeding continued="true">
    <name>Question Time</name>
    <subject>
      <name>Royal Adelaide Hospital</name>
      <text id="201611304559727c2fcf44e680000400">
        <heading>Royal Adelaide Hospital</heading>
      </text>
      <talker role="member" id="4338" kind="question">
        <name>Mr MARSHALL</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">Dunstan</electorate>
        <portfolios>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Leader of the Opposition</name>
          </portfolio>
        </portfolios>
        <questions>
          <question date="2016-11-30">
            <name>Royal Adelaide Hospital</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2016-11-30T14:06:06" />
        <text id="201611304559727c2fcf44e680000401">
          <timeStamp time="2016-11-30T14:06:06" />
          <by role="member" id="4338">Mr MARSHALL (Dunstan—Leader of the Opposition) (14:06):</by>  My question is to the Minister for Health. Why did the government sign a $12 billion contract to build and operate the new Royal Adelaide Hospital that does not address ramifications for noncompliance?</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="627" kind="answer">
        <name>The Hon. J.J. SNELLING</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">Playford</electorate>
        <portfolios>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Health</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for the Arts</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Health Industries</name>
          </portfolio>
        </portfolios>
        <questions>
          <question date="2016-11-30">
            <name>Royal Adelaide Hospital</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2016-11-30T14:06:21" />
        <text id="201611304559727c2fcf44e680000402">
          <timeStamp time="2016-11-30T14:06:21" />
          <by role="member" id="627">The Hon. J.J. SNELLING (Playford—Minister for Health, Minister for the Arts, Minister for Health Industries) (14:06):</by>  Well, it does. It was very interesting to see the Hon. Stephen Wade once again completely out of his depth—</text>
      </talker>
      <talker kind="speech" role="office">
        <name>An honourable member</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="201611304559727c2fcf44e680000403">
          <by role="office">An honourable member:</by>  Wading in.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="627" kind="answer" continued="true">
        <name>The Hon. J.J. SNELLING</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="201611304559727c2fcf44e680000404">
          <by role="member" id="627">The Hon. J.J. SNELLING:</by>  —wading in, quoting comments he had only heard second-hand. How extraordinary! The simple fact is that that assertion by the Hon. Stephen Wade is not an accurate representation of what Justice Blue was saying.</text>
        <text id="201611304559727c2fcf44e680000405">The second point I would make is that we do have a very strong contract. That contract does have ramifications for noncompliance. Those penalties amount to at least $1 million a day for every day that hospital doesn't reach technical completion. The government will be seeking compensation for other areas as well. The fact is we do have a very strong contract, and that contract does protect the interests of South Australian taxpayers.</text>
      </talker>
    </subject>
  </proceeding>
</hansard>