<!--The Official Report of Parliamentary Debates (Hansard) of the Legislative Council and the House of Assembly of the Parliament of South Australia are covered by parliamentary privilege. Republication by others is not afforded the same protection and may result in exposure to legal liability if the material is defamatory. You may copy and make use of excerpts of proceedings where (1) you attribute the Parliament as the source, (2) you assume the risk of liability if the manner of your use is defamatory, (3) you do not use the material for the purpose of advertising, satire or ridicule, or to misrepresent members of Parliament, and (4) your use of the extracts is fair, accurate and not misleading. Copyright in the Official Report of Parliamentary Debates is held by the Attorney-General of South Australia.-->
<hansard id="" tocId="" xml:lang="EN-AU" schemaVersion="1.0" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xml="http://www.w3.org/XML/1998/namespace" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2007/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="hansard_1_0.xsd">
  <name>House of Assembly</name>
  <date date="2016-11-17" />
  <sessionName>Fifty-Third Parliament, Second Session (53-2)</sessionName>
  <parliamentNum>53</parliamentNum>
  <sessionNum>2</sessionNum>
  <parliamentName>Parliament of South Australia</parliamentName>
  <house>House of Assembly</house>
  <venue></venue>
  <reviewStage>published</reviewStage>
  <startPage num="8017" />
  <endPage num="8092" />
  <dateModified time="2022-08-06T14:30:00+00:00" />
  <proceeding continued="true">
    <name>Question Time</name>
    <subject>
      <name>Royal Adelaide Hospital Site Redevelopment</name>
      <text id="201611176296acf85eb94f7780000420">
        <heading>Royal Adelaide Hospital Site Redevelopment</heading>
      </text>
      <talker role="member" id="4338" kind="question">
        <name>Mr MARSHALL</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">Dunstan</electorate>
        <portfolios>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Leader of the Opposition</name>
          </portfolio>
        </portfolios>
        <questions>
          <question date="2016-11-17">
            <name>Royal Adelaide Hospital Site Redevelopment</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2016-11-17T14:20:01" />
        <text id="201611176296acf85eb94f7780000421">
          <timeStamp time="2016-11-17T14:20:01" />
          <by role="member" id="4338">Mr MARSHALL (Dunstan—Leader of the Opposition) (14:20):</by>  My question is to the Treasurer. Does the Treasurer support the proposal to establish the history of South Australia museum proposed by the government's preferred proponent as part of the old Royal Adelaide Hospital site redevelopment?</text>
        <text id="201611176296acf85eb94f7780000422">
          <event kind="interjection">Members interjecting:</event>
        </text>
      </talker>
      <talker kind="speech" role="office">
        <name>The Speaker</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="201611176296acf85eb94f7780000423">
          <by role="office">The SPEAKER:</by>  Would the minister be seated. The minister has not said anything yet, so he is not being provocative. The wall of interjections he is getting are all, of course, out of order. I just want to draw to the attention of the member for Morialta that he had a call to order and a warning from the morning session of the house, so he is now on two warnings. The member for Schubert already had a warning, and the member for Hartley already had a call to order, so he is warned. I am sorry—the member for Schubert had a call to order.</text>
        <text id="201611176296acf85eb94f7780000424">
          <event kind="interjection">Members interjecting:</event>
        </text>
      </talker>
      <talker kind="speech" role="office">
        <name>The Speaker</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="201611176296acf85eb94f7780000425">
          <by role="office">The SPEAKER:</by>  This morning.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="4343">
        <name>Mr GARDNER</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="201611176296acf85eb94f7780000426">
          <by role="member" id="4343">Mr GARDNER:</by>  Point of order, sir: the only time I spoke this morning was prior to the first division, and the <term>Hansard</term> records who was there and capable of giving warnings to me at that time. I certainly don't remember one.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker kind="speech" role="office">
        <name>The Speaker</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="201611176296acf85eb94f7780000427">
          <by role="office">The SPEAKER:</by>  I will consult the Deputy Speaker, who was here during the morning session. The minister.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="4842" kind="answer">
        <name>The Hon. S.C. MULLIGHAN</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">Lee</electorate>
        <portfolios>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Transport and Infrastructure</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Housing and Urban Development</name>
          </portfolio>
        </portfolios>
        <startTime time="2016-11-17T14:22:00" />
        <page num="8049" />
        <text id="201611176296acf85eb94f7780000428">
          <timeStamp time="2016-11-17T14:22:00" />
          <by role="member" id="4842">The Hon. S.C. MULLIGHAN (Lee—Minister for Transport and Infrastructure, Minister for Housing and Urban Development) (14:22):</by>  Thank you, Mr Speaker. In response to that question, it is important to remind ourselves what has been proposed for the use of the old Royal Adelaide Hospital site. We not only have the preferred developer, of course, who will be superintending the development but we have a partnership between the University of Adelaide and the developer to deliver a research and innovation hub.</text>
        <text id="201611176296acf85eb94f7780000429">We have the adaptive re-use of heritage buildings, and yes, absolutely, the proponent has been talking to organisations around Adelaide, indeed I think around Australia, trying to attract their interest to assist them in what will be a project requirement from the government, that is, the re-use of those five important heritage buildings which front that corner of Frome Road and North Terrace.</text>
        <text id="201611176296acf85eb94f7780000430">Whether it is to be the use that the leader refers to in his question, or indeed that the proponent had referred to in their prospectus document—which, shock horror, amongst the dozens of other organisations that they have been talking to in the last six months, has finally, weeks after the government made these plans public, somehow made its way into the hands of the opposition—it will be up to the proponent to demonstrate that it can be used for that purpose. It is in the best interests of that heritage building, and it is in the best interests of the development as a whole. Given that, as we have set out in some detail both in this place and in the media, we need to go through a process—</text>
        <text id="201611176296acf85eb94f7780000431">
          <event kind="interjection" role="member" id="1813">Ms Redmond interjecting:</event>
        </text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="4842" kind="answer" continued="true">
        <name>The Hon. S.C. MULLIGHAN</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="201611176296acf85eb94f7780000432">
          <by role="member" id="4842">The Hon. S.C. MULLIGHAN:</by>  Yes, we register your dissent to the leader. That is understood, member for Heysen. We know you are not happy. Those old and deep wounds take a long time to heal; I appreciate that, member for Heysen. Once that is resolved by the proponent in negotiations with the government, then if there are further developments about what is planned for that site, then once they are confirmed we will release those as well. But the fact is they are not confirmed and they are not yet ready to be released because it has not been agreed by the proponent, or by the government, that they will be going forward.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker kind="speech" role="office">
        <name>The Speaker</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="201611176296acf85eb94f7780000433">
          <by role="office">The SPEAKER:</by>  I have consulted the Deputy Speaker, and she said she made no calls to order or warnings in the morning session. Accordingly, the member for Unley was right; they must be from another day.</text>
      </talker>
    </subject>
  </proceeding>
</hansard>