<!--The Official Report of Parliamentary Debates (Hansard) of the Legislative Council and the House of Assembly of the Parliament of South Australia are covered by parliamentary privilege. Republication by others is not afforded the same protection and may result in exposure to legal liability if the material is defamatory. You may copy and make use of excerpts of proceedings where (1) you attribute the Parliament as the source, (2) you assume the risk of liability if the manner of your use is defamatory, (3) you do not use the material for the purpose of advertising, satire or ridicule, or to misrepresent members of Parliament, and (4) your use of the extracts is fair, accurate and not misleading. Copyright in the Official Report of Parliamentary Debates is held by the Attorney-General of South Australia.-->
<hansard id="" tocId="" xml:lang="EN-AU" schemaVersion="1.0" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xml="http://www.w3.org/XML/1998/namespace" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2007/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="hansard_1_0.xsd">
  <name>House of Assembly</name>
  <date date="2016-11-16" />
  <sessionName>Fifty-Third Parliament, Second Session (53-2)</sessionName>
  <parliamentNum>53</parliamentNum>
  <sessionNum>2</sessionNum>
  <parliamentName>Parliament of South Australia</parliamentName>
  <house>House of Assembly</house>
  <venue></venue>
  <reviewStage>published</reviewStage>
  <startPage num="7823" />
  <endPage num="8015" />
  <dateModified time="2022-08-06T14:30:00+00:00" />
  <proceeding continued="true">
    <name>Question Time</name>
    <subject>
      <name>Royal Adelaide Hospital</name>
      <text id="20161116729cfc316d1b414480000491">
        <heading>Royal Adelaide Hospital</heading>
      </text>
      <talker role="member" id="1804" kind="question">
        <name>Ms CHAPMAN</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">Bragg</electorate>
        <portfolios>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Deputy Leader of the Opposition</name>
          </portfolio>
        </portfolios>
        <questions>
          <question date="2016-11-16">
            <name>Royal Adelaide Hospital</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2016-11-16T15:07:40" />
        <text id="20161116729cfc316d1b414480000492">
          <timeStamp time="2016-11-16T15:07:40" />
          <by role="member" id="1804">Ms CHAPMAN (Bragg—Deputy Leader of the Opposition) (15:07):</by>  My question is to the Minister for Health. Is it the case that the rejection of the cure plan risks stopping Project Co. from completing the new Royal Adelaide Hospital, as they advised the Supreme Court this morning?</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="627" kind="answer">
        <name>The Hon. J.J. SNELLING</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">Playford</electorate>
        <portfolios>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Health</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for the Arts</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Health Industries</name>
          </portfolio>
        </portfolios>
        <questions>
          <question date="2016-11-16">
            <name>Royal Adelaide Hospital</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2016-11-16T15:07:59" />
        <text id="20161116729cfc316d1b414480000493">
          <timeStamp time="2016-11-16T15:07:59" />
          <by role="member" id="627">The Hon. J.J. SNELLING (Playford—Minister for Health, Minister for the Arts, Minister for Health Industries) (15:07):</by>  I will not be making any comment about what is said in the Supreme Court, other than to say what I have already said, and that is that my independent legal advice to the government is that our contract is very, very strong and protects the interests of taxpayers and protects, most importantly, the interests of the patients who will move into the new hospital.</text>
        <text id="20161116729cfc316d1b414480000494">
          <event kind="interjection" role="member" id="4847">Mr Knoll interjecting:</event>
        </text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="627" kind="answer" continued="true">
        <name>The Hon. J.J. SNELLING</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20161116729cfc316d1b414480000495">
          <by role="member" id="627">The Hon. J.J. SNELLING:</by>  And, unlike the member for Schubert, who obviously wants me to pursue a plan where we just do whatever SAHP ask of us and cut corners and make mistakes that the Liberal government in Queensland made, where they forced the opening of a hospital to a political agenda, I won't be making that mistake despite the calls of the opposition, who would take a very wishy-washy, weak role when it comes to dealing with large multinational corporations. I will stand up for the rights of South Australian taxpayers and for the rights of the patients who will go to that hospital.</text>
      </talker>
    </subject>
  </proceeding>
</hansard>