<!--The Official Report of Parliamentary Debates (Hansard) of the Legislative Council and the House of Assembly of the Parliament of South Australia are covered by parliamentary privilege. Republication by others is not afforded the same protection and may result in exposure to legal liability if the material is defamatory. You may copy and make use of excerpts of proceedings where (1) you attribute the Parliament as the source, (2) you assume the risk of liability if the manner of your use is defamatory, (3) you do not use the material for the purpose of advertising, satire or ridicule, or to misrepresent members of Parliament, and (4) your use of the extracts is fair, accurate and not misleading. Copyright in the Official Report of Parliamentary Debates is held by the Attorney-General of South Australia.-->
<hansard id="" tocId="" xml:lang="EN-AU" schemaVersion="1.0" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xml="http://www.w3.org/XML/1998/namespace" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2007/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="hansard_1_0.xsd">
  <name>House of Assembly</name>
  <date date="2016-11-16" />
  <sessionName>Fifty-Third Parliament, Second Session (53-2)</sessionName>
  <parliamentNum>53</parliamentNum>
  <sessionNum>2</sessionNum>
  <parliamentName>Parliament of South Australia</parliamentName>
  <house>House of Assembly</house>
  <venue></venue>
  <reviewStage>published</reviewStage>
  <startPage num="7823" />
  <endPage num="8015" />
  <dateModified time="2022-08-06T14:30:00+00:00" />
  <proceeding continued="true">
    <name>Question Time</name>
    <subject>
      <name>Nuclear Waste</name>
      <text id="20161116414900f4a39e476380000413">
        <heading>Nuclear Waste</heading>
      </text>
      <talker role="member" id="4338" kind="question">
        <name>Mr MARSHALL</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">Dunstan</electorate>
        <portfolios>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Leader of the Opposition</name>
          </portfolio>
        </portfolios>
        <questions>
          <question date="2016-11-16">
            <name>Nuclear Waste</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2016-11-16T14:49:28" />
        <text id="20161116414900f4a39e476380000414">
          <timeStamp time="2016-11-16T14:49:28" />
          <by role="member" id="4338">Mr MARSHALL (Dunstan—Leader of the Opposition) (14:49):</by>  My question is to the Premier. Does the Premier not believe that if he is seeking support for a proposal for the people of South Australia and for them to support that, then the people deserve to be assured that his ministerial colleagues, his cabinet colleagues, also support the proposition?</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="1812" kind="answer">
        <name>The Hon. J.W. WEATHERILL</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">Cheltenham</electorate>
        <portfolios>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Premier</name>
          </portfolio>
        </portfolios>
        <questions>
          <question date="2016-11-16">
            <name>Nuclear Waste</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2016-11-16T14:49:34" />
        <page num="7851" />
        <text id="20161116414900f4a39e476380000415">
          <timeStamp time="2016-11-16T14:49:34" />
          <by role="member" id="1812">The Hon. J.W. WEATHERILL (Cheltenham—Premier) (14:49):</by>  I think that before the people of South Australia get an opportunity to consider this matter at a referendum, they would want to be assured that the Leader of the Opposition is providing his bipartisan support. We have heard two explanations as to why the Leader of the Opposition has withdrawn his bipartisan support: first, the citizens' jury that he himself described as a flawed process; and second, a report that says that you can't rely upon it to reach the conclusions he has reached. If this is the will of the Liberal Party as expressed by the Leader of the Opposition, where they have all been boxed into a corner, because he had a bit of a meltdown in an interview with—</text>
        <text id="20161116414900f4a39e476380000416">
          <event kind="interjection">Members interjecting:</event>
        </text>
      </talker>
      <talker kind="speech" role="office">
        <name>The Speaker</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20161116414900f4a39e476380000417">
          <by role="office">The SPEAKER:</by>  The Treasurer is on two warnings.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="1812" kind="answer" continued="true">
        <name>The Hon. J.W. WEATHERILL</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20161116414900f4a39e476380000418">
          <by role="member" id="1812">The Hon. J.W. WEATHERILL:</by>  We all know that they have been embarrassed into this position. They don't want to be in this position but they were embarrassed into it because they were driven to the obvious conclusion that, if they didn't back him, he would have to resign. They knew—</text>
        <text id="20161116414900f4a39e476380000419">
          <event kind="interjection">Members interjecting:</event>
        </text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="1812" kind="answer" continued="true">
        <name>The Hon. J.W. WEATHERILL</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20161116414900f4a39e476380000420">
          <by role="member" id="1812">The Hon. J.W. WEATHERILL:</by>  They have saved him, and that's fine—prop him up. That's fine, and I understand why you did it. It was very loyal of you to do that, to prop him up, but you are taking a horrible risk. What if we get another episode like the 2014 state election? What if it all turns to horror again on the first day?</text>
        <text id="20161116414900f4a39e476380000421">
          <event kind="interjection">Members interjecting:</event>
        </text>
      </talker>
      <talker kind="speech" role="office">
        <name>The Speaker</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20161116414900f4a39e476380000422">
          <by role="office">The SPEAKER:</by>  The Treasurer is on thin ice.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="1812" kind="answer" continued="true">
        <name>The Hon. J.W. WEATHERILL</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20161116414900f4a39e476380000423">
          <by role="member" id="1812">The Hon. J.W. WEATHERILL:</by>  They are brave to back him up one more time. For those who are watching this and are thinking of perhaps putting their hopes and faith in the Leader of the Opposition, I will say this: don't rely upon this opposition to maintain their permanent position in relation to this matter. We saw how quickly it changed. We have seen the thin basis on which the only way the people of South Australia will get a true say in this is to stick with the Labor Party's position which allows them to have a voice in relation to this matter.</text>
        <text id="20161116414900f4a39e476380000424">
          <event kind="interjection">Members interjecting:</event>
        </text>
      </talker>
      <talker kind="speech" role="office">
        <name>The Speaker</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20161116414900f4a39e476380000425">
          <by role="office">The SPEAKER:</by>  We have a very full gallery today because of the active voluntary euthanasia debate. I don't know what they make of the behaviour of the house today. I imagine they are not impressed. Leader.</text>
      </talker>
    </subject>
  </proceeding>
</hansard>