<!--The Official Report of Parliamentary Debates (Hansard) of the Legislative Council and the House of Assembly of the Parliament of South Australia are covered by parliamentary privilege. Republication by others is not afforded the same protection and may result in exposure to legal liability if the material is defamatory. You may copy and make use of excerpts of proceedings where (1) you attribute the Parliament as the source, (2) you assume the risk of liability if the manner of your use is defamatory, (3) you do not use the material for the purpose of advertising, satire or ridicule, or to misrepresent members of Parliament, and (4) your use of the extracts is fair, accurate and not misleading. Copyright in the Official Report of Parliamentary Debates is held by the Attorney-General of South Australia.-->
<hansard id="" tocId="" xml:lang="EN-AU" schemaVersion="1.0" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xml="http://www.w3.org/XML/1998/namespace" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2007/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="hansard_1_0.xsd">
  <name>House of Assembly</name>
  <date date="2016-11-16" />
  <sessionName>Fifty-Third Parliament, Second Session (53-2)</sessionName>
  <parliamentNum>53</parliamentNum>
  <sessionNum>2</sessionNum>
  <parliamentName>Parliament of South Australia</parliamentName>
  <house>House of Assembly</house>
  <venue></venue>
  <reviewStage>published</reviewStage>
  <startPage num="7823" />
  <endPage num="8015" />
  <dateModified time="2022-08-06T14:30:00+00:00" />
  <proceeding continued="true">
    <name>Question Time</name>
    <subject>
      <name>Nuclear Waste</name>
      <text id="201611167dbaafd618924b1ca0000380">
        <heading>Nuclear Waste</heading>
      </text>
      <talker role="member" id="4338" kind="question">
        <name>Mr MARSHALL</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">Dunstan</electorate>
        <portfolios>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Leader of the Opposition</name>
          </portfolio>
        </portfolios>
        <questions>
          <question date="2016-11-16">
            <name>Nuclear Waste</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2016-11-16T14:45:14" />
        <text id="201611167dbaafd618924b1ca0000381">
          <timeStamp time="2016-11-16T14:45:14" />
          <by role="member" id="4338">Mr MARSHALL (Dunstan—Leader of the Opposition) (14:45):</by>  Are you sure he has had no warnings? My supplementary is to the Minister for Regional Development. Given a nuclear dump is not a matter of supply or confidence, why is the minister unable to speak for himself?</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="1812" kind="answer">
        <name>The Hon. J.W. WEATHERILL</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">Cheltenham</electorate>
        <portfolios>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Premier</name>
          </portfolio>
        </portfolios>
        <questions>
          <question date="2016-11-16">
            <name>Nuclear Waste</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2016-11-16T14:45:30" />
        <text id="201611167dbaafd618924b1ca0000382">
          <timeStamp time="2016-11-16T14:45:30" />
          <by role="member" id="1812">The Hon. J.W. WEATHERILL (Cheltenham—Premier) (14:45):</by>  We have taken a position in relation to this question which is a united position. We have considered this deeply, and we also believed that we had bipartisan support in relation to this question. This doesn't just—</text>
        <text id="201611167dbaafd618924b1ca0000383">
          <event kind="interjection">Members interjecting:</event>
        </text>
      </talker>
      <talker kind="speech" role="office">
        <name>The Speaker</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="201611167dbaafd618924b1ca0000384">
          <by role="office">The SPEAKER:</by>  The member for Stuart is called to order.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="1812" kind="answer" continued="true">
        <name>The Hon. J.W. WEATHERILL</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="201611167dbaafd618924b1ca0000385">
          <by role="member" id="1812">The Hon. J.W. WEATHERILL:</by>  It doesn't just rely upon what the Labor Party's position is in relation to this matter, it relies—</text>
        <text id="201611167dbaafd618924b1ca0000386">
          <event kind="interjection">Members interjecting:</event>
        </text>
      </talker>
      <talker kind="speech" role="office">
        <name>The Speaker</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="201611167dbaafd618924b1ca0000387">
          <by role="office">The SPEAKER:</by>  The member for Hammond is warned.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="1812" kind="answer" continued="true">
        <name>The Hon. J.W. WEATHERILL</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="201611167dbaafd618924b1ca0000388">
          <by role="member" id="1812">The Hon. J.W. WEATHERILL:</by>  —it relies upon the attitude and the perspective of the Liberal Party in this state. It is necessary. It is a necessary precondition to furthering this issue. We know that this is a long-term discussion. We were seeking, in an open, honest and I would say courageous way, to put on the public agenda something that has been urged upon us by those opposite and by the business community in South Australia.</text>
        <text id="201611167dbaafd618924b1ca0000389">We always said that we would expose ourselves to the most detailed community consultation process available. We would experiment with innovative processes to establish what the community was thinking about these matters, but we always said that this ultimately was a matter for government and that we would make our own judgements about what the way forward was. We have had to take the disparate points of view, suffering the burden of the Leader of the Opposition—</text>
        <text id="201611167dbaafd618924b1ca0000390">
          <event kind="interjection" role="member" id="614">The Hon. J.M. Rankine interjecting:</event>
        </text>
      </talker>
      <talker kind="speech" role="office">
        <name>The Speaker</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="201611167dbaafd618924b1ca0000391">
          <by role="office">The SPEAKER:</by>  The member for Wright is warned.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="1812" kind="answer" continued="true">
        <name>The Hon. J.W. WEATHERILL</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <page num="7850" />
        <text id="201611167dbaafd618924b1ca0000392">
          <by role="member" id="1812">The Hon. J.W. WEATHERILL:</by>  —suffering the burden of the Leader of the Opposition having a fit of panic at one stage during the process, and we have nevertheless decided to press ahead with the public discussion about this matter.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="4342">
        <name>Mr VAN HOLST PELLEKAAN</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="201611167dbaafd618924b1ca0000393">
          <by role="member" id="4342">Mr VAN HOLST PELLEKAAN:</by>  Point of order, sir.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="1812" kind="answer" continued="true">
        <name>The Hon. J.W. WEATHERILL</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="201611167dbaafd618924b1ca0000394">
          <by role="member" id="1812">The Hon. J.W. WEATHERILL:</by>  I think there are significant sections—</text>
      </talker>
      <talker kind="speech" role="office">
        <name>The Speaker</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="201611167dbaafd618924b1ca0000395">
          <by role="office">The SPEAKER:</by>  Would the Premier be seated? This is getting like an Australian Union of Students conference, and I have very bad memories of those.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="4342">
        <name>Mr VAN HOLST PELLEKAAN</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="201611167dbaafd618924b1ca0000396">
          <by role="member" id="4342">Mr VAN HOLST PELLEKAAN:</by>  I have never been to one.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker kind="speech" role="office">
        <name>The Speaker</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="201611167dbaafd618924b1ca0000397">
          <by role="office">The SPEAKER:</by>  The member for Stuart?</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="4342">
        <name>Mr VAN HOLST PELLEKAAN</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="201611167dbaafd618924b1ca0000398">
          <by role="member" id="4342">Mr VAN HOLST PELLEKAAN:</by>  Yes, sir: debate. Talking about the Leader of the Opposition again has no connection to the question about the Minister for Regional Development.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker kind="speech" role="office">
        <name>The Speaker</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="201611167dbaafd618924b1ca0000399">
          <by role="office">The SPEAKER:</by>  I have ruled on this several times already, and I am afraid I am not with the member for Stuart on the question of relevance.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker kind="speech" role="office">
        <name>An honourable member</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="201611167dbaafd618924b1ca0000400">
          <by role="office">An honourable member:</by>  It's actually National Union of Students.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker kind="speech" role="office">
        <name>The Speaker</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="201611167dbaafd618924b1ca0000401">
          <by role="office">The SPEAKER:</by>  No, it's been changed subsequently.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="1812" kind="answer" continued="true">
        <name>The Hon. J.W. WEATHERILL</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="201611167dbaafd618924b1ca0000402">
          <by role="member" id="1812">The Hon. J.W. WEATHERILL:</by>  That's right. What we have are juvenile question time tactics on an issue of gravity for not only the people of South Australia but the nation and indeed the world. This is not just an issue that the people of South Australia are watching. The international community are watching us and they are particularly looking at the attitude of those opposite. What was beginning to occur here is that there was international attention—</text>
        <text id="201611167dbaafd618924b1ca0000403">
          <event kind="interjection">Members interjecting:</event>
        </text>
      </talker>
      <talker kind="speech" role="office">
        <name>The Speaker</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="201611167dbaafd618924b1ca0000404">
          <by role="office">The SPEAKER:</by>  The member for Unley is warned.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="1812" kind="answer" continued="true">
        <name>The Hon. J.W. WEATHERILL</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="201611167dbaafd618924b1ca0000405">
          <by role="member" id="1812">The Hon. J.W. WEATHERILL:</by>  —international attention being paid to the way in which we were carefully constructing this debate about this most important issue. Those opposite have been asked this question, and they have been tested about whether they are up to participating in a mature debate about an issue of democracy—a really important issue that I said would test our democracy. Which political party demonstrated that they have failed the test of the democracy? The Liberal Party of South Australia.</text>
      </talker>
    </subject>
  </proceeding>
</hansard>