<!--The Official Report of Parliamentary Debates (Hansard) of the Legislative Council and the House of Assembly of the Parliament of South Australia are covered by parliamentary privilege. Republication by others is not afforded the same protection and may result in exposure to legal liability if the material is defamatory. You may copy and make use of excerpts of proceedings where (1) you attribute the Parliament as the source, (2) you assume the risk of liability if the manner of your use is defamatory, (3) you do not use the material for the purpose of advertising, satire or ridicule, or to misrepresent members of Parliament, and (4) your use of the extracts is fair, accurate and not misleading. Copyright in the Official Report of Parliamentary Debates is held by the Attorney-General of South Australia.-->
<hansard id="" tocId="" xml:lang="EN-AU" schemaVersion="1.0" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xml="http://www.w3.org/XML/1998/namespace" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2007/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="hansard_1_0.xsd">
  <name>House of Assembly</name>
  <date date="2016-11-15" />
  <sessionName>Fifty-Third Parliament, Second Session (53-2)</sessionName>
  <parliamentNum>53</parliamentNum>
  <sessionNum>2</sessionNum>
  <parliamentName>Parliament of South Australia</parliamentName>
  <house>House of Assembly</house>
  <venue></venue>
  <reviewStage>published</reviewStage>
  <startPage num="7715" />
  <endPage num="7822" />
  <dateModified time="2022-08-06T14:30:00+00:00" />
  <proceeding continued="true">
    <name>Question Time</name>
    <subject>
      <name>Child Protection</name>
      <text id="201611159f3807d93e0e4430b0001135">
        <heading>Child Protection</heading>
      </text>
      <talker role="member" id="4840" kind="question">
        <name>Mr TARZIA</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">Hartley</electorate>
        <questions>
          <question date="2016-11-15">
            <name>Child Protection</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2016-11-15T15:28:12" />
        <text id="201611159f3807d93e0e4430b0001136">
          <timeStamp time="2016-11-15T15:28:12" />
          <by role="member" id="4840">Mr TARZIA (Hartley) (15:28):</by>  My question is to the Minister for Education and Child Development. How does the minister reconcile telling the community that child protection is everyone's business and then ignoring 84 per cent of their screening notifications that community members have, in many cases, taken hours of their precious time to report?</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="4622" kind="answer">
        <name>The Hon. S.E. CLOSE</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">Port Adelaide</electorate>
        <portfolios>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Education and Child Development</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Higher Education and Skills</name>
          </portfolio>
        </portfolios>
        <questions>
          <question date="2016-11-15">
            <name>Child Protection</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2016-11-15T15:28:34" />
        <text id="201611159f3807d93e0e4430b0001137">
          <timeStamp time="2016-11-15T15:28:34" />
          <by role="member" id="4622">The Hon. S.E. CLOSE (Port Adelaide—Minister for Education and Child Development, Minister for Higher Education and Skills) (15:28):</by>  It is tempting to be critical of the question, but I take it in good faith that it's a genuine concern about the way in which our child protection system operates. One of the challenges is the volume of notifications that are received from the community. In fact, perhaps I will pick this up on another occasion because people probably aren't listening.</text>
        <text id="201611159f3807d93e0e4430b0001138">
          <event kind="interjection">Members interjecting:</event>
        </text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="4622" kind="answer" continued="true">
        <name>The Hon. S.E. CLOSE</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="201611159f3807d93e0e4430b0001139">
          <by role="member" id="4622">The Hon. S.E. CLOSE:</by>  The mass departure had distracted me.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="4342" kind="interjection">
        <name>Mr van Holst Pellekaan</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <page num="7770" />
        <text id="201611159f3807d93e0e4430b0001140">
          <by role="member" id="4342">Mr van Holst Pellekaan:</by>  It's your side that's walking out.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="4622" kind="answer" continued="true">
        <name>The Hon. S.E. CLOSE</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="201611159f3807d93e0e4430b0001141">
          <by role="member" id="4622">The Hon. S.E. CLOSE:</by>  Your side left some time ago. In essence, we have some 60,000 notifications that are made, which reduces to some 20,000 screened-in notifications, which then comes down to around 5,000 investigations. Those figures mean that the workers are straining to take all of the information and then to act upon it.</text>
        <text id="201611159f3807d93e0e4430b0001142">If you get down to the level of the number of substantiated investigations and the number of children removed from their families, we actually are very much on a par with most other states, which suggests that we are, like all other states, doing our best to get to the children who are most in need, who most require removal from their family. This in no way stops the truth of the statement that all of us, as adults, have a responsibility to take care of those who cannot take care of themselves, and that is our children.</text>
      </talker>
    </subject>
  </proceeding>
</hansard>