<!--The Official Report of Parliamentary Debates (Hansard) of the Legislative Council and the House of Assembly of the Parliament of South Australia are covered by parliamentary privilege. Republication by others is not afforded the same protection and may result in exposure to legal liability if the material is defamatory. You may copy and make use of excerpts of proceedings where (1) you attribute the Parliament as the source, (2) you assume the risk of liability if the manner of your use is defamatory, (3) you do not use the material for the purpose of advertising, satire or ridicule, or to misrepresent members of Parliament, and (4) your use of the extracts is fair, accurate and not misleading. Copyright in the Official Report of Parliamentary Debates is held by the Attorney-General of South Australia.-->
<hansard id="" tocId="" xml:lang="EN-AU" schemaVersion="1.0" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xml="http://www.w3.org/XML/1998/namespace" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2007/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="hansard_1_0.xsd">
  <name>House of Assembly</name>
  <date date="2016-11-15" />
  <sessionName>Fifty-Third Parliament, Second Session (53-2)</sessionName>
  <parliamentNum>53</parliamentNum>
  <sessionNum>2</sessionNum>
  <parliamentName>Parliament of South Australia</parliamentName>
  <house>House of Assembly</house>
  <venue></venue>
  <reviewStage>published</reviewStage>
  <startPage num="7715" />
  <endPage num="7822" />
  <dateModified time="2022-08-06T14:30:00+00:00" />
  <proceeding continued="true">
    <name>Question Time</name>
    <subject>
      <name>Nuclear Waste</name>
      <text id="20161115c00dbf7f777e44dbb0001015">
        <heading>Nuclear Waste</heading>
      </text>
      <talker role="member" id="4342" kind="question">
        <name>Mr VAN HOLST PELLEKAAN</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">Stuart</electorate>
        <questions>
          <question date="2016-11-15">
            <name>Nuclear Waste</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2016-11-15T15:00:52" />
        <text id="20161115c00dbf7f777e44dbb0001016">
          <timeStamp time="2016-11-15T15:00:52" />
          <by role="member" id="4342">Mr VAN HOLST PELLEKAAN (Stuart) (15:00):</by>  My question is to the Minister for Regional Development. Does the Independent minister support the Premier's proposed nuclear waste dump?</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="1812" kind="answer">
        <name>The Hon. J.W. WEATHERILL</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">Cheltenham</electorate>
        <portfolios>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Premier</name>
          </portfolio>
        </portfolios>
        <questions>
          <question date="2016-11-15">
            <name>Nuclear Waste</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2016-11-15T15:01:10" />
        <text id="20161115c00dbf7f777e44dbb0001017">
          <timeStamp time="2016-11-15T15:01:10" />
          <by role="member" id="1812">The Hon. J.W. WEATHERILL (Cheltenham—Premier) (15:01):</by>  In respect of the government's position in relation to this matter, there is a cabinet decision and all cabinet ministers support it. Let's remind those opposite what that decision is: it is to allow discussion—simply, to allow discussion. I know those opposite are getting very hot and sweaty about the events and—</text>
        <text id="20161115c00dbf7f777e44dbb0001018">
          <event kind="interjection">Members interjecting:</event>
        </text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="1812" kind="answer" continued="true">
        <name>The Hon. J.W. WEATHERILL</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20161115c00dbf7f777e44dbb0001019">
          <by role="member" id="1812">The Hon. J.W. WEATHERILL:</by>  —are getting very agitated, and it must create a lot of mental confusion to hold these two ideas in your head. Are we pro nuclear waste? Are we pro coal mining? Are we against renewables? This must be complex. I understand it creates a lot of cognitive dissonance inside the mind of a human being to hold two particularly inconsistent propositions at the same time. It is very difficult.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="627" kind="interjection">
        <name>The Hon. J.J. Snelling</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20161115c00dbf7f777e44dbb0001020">
          <by role="member" id="627">The Hon. J.J. Snelling:</by>  Brain arcing.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="1812" kind="answer" continued="true">
        <name>The Hon. J.W. WEATHERILL</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <page num="7763" />
        <text id="20161115c00dbf7f777e44dbb0001021">
          <by role="member" id="1812">The Hon. J.W. WEATHERILL:</by>  Yes, the brain arcing that has been going on opposite must be disturbing, and it is causing a lot of behavioural problems. That's why you are hearing loud noises emanating from the opposition benches and people are being sent out. But there is one position, and it is the position that has been articulated in the ministerial statement and I speak for the government in that regard. Of course, there is a diversity of views on the ultimate question but we—</text>
        <text id="20161115c00dbf7f777e44dbb0001022">
          <event kind="interjection">Members interjecting:</event>
        </text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="1812" kind="answer" continued="true">
        <name>The Hon. J.W. WEATHERILL</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20161115c00dbf7f777e44dbb0001023">
          <by role="member" id="1812">The Hon. J.W. WEATHERILL:</by>  When the Leader of the Opposition said, 'Well, let's see what happens in the Liberal party room on Monday,' and then, within two hours, was out saying, 'The project is dead,' sadly for the member for Stuart he was out later that day saying, 'Let's see what happens in the party room.' So, the—</text>
      </talker>
      <talker kind="speech" role="office">
        <name>The Speaker</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20161115c00dbf7f777e44dbb0001024">
          <by role="office">The SPEAKER:</by>  Point of order from the member for Hartley.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="4840">
        <name>Mr TARZIA</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20161115c00dbf7f777e44dbb0001025">
          <by role="member" id="4840">Mr TARZIA:</by>  Point of order, sir: relevance. This has absolutely no relevance to the question.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker kind="speech" role="office">
        <name>The Speaker</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20161115c00dbf7f777e44dbb0001026">
          <by role="office">The SPEAKER:</by>  Yes, I think the Premier has probably completed his answer, and I uphold the member for Hartley's point of order. The member for Colton.</text>
      </talker>
    </subject>
  </proceeding>
</hansard>