<!--The Official Report of Parliamentary Debates (Hansard) of the Legislative Council and the House of Assembly of the Parliament of South Australia are covered by parliamentary privilege. Republication by others is not afforded the same protection and may result in exposure to legal liability if the material is defamatory. You may copy and make use of excerpts of proceedings where (1) you attribute the Parliament as the source, (2) you assume the risk of liability if the manner of your use is defamatory, (3) you do not use the material for the purpose of advertising, satire or ridicule, or to misrepresent members of Parliament, and (4) your use of the extracts is fair, accurate and not misleading. Copyright in the Official Report of Parliamentary Debates is held by the Attorney-General of South Australia.-->
<hansard id="" tocId="" xml:lang="EN-AU" schemaVersion="1.0" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xml="http://www.w3.org/XML/1998/namespace" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2007/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="hansard_1_0.xsd">
  <name>House of Assembly</name>
  <date date="2016-11-15" />
  <sessionName>Fifty-Third Parliament, Second Session (53-2)</sessionName>
  <parliamentNum>53</parliamentNum>
  <sessionNum>2</sessionNum>
  <parliamentName>Parliament of South Australia</parliamentName>
  <house>House of Assembly</house>
  <venue></venue>
  <reviewStage>published</reviewStage>
  <startPage num="7715" />
  <endPage num="7822" />
  <dateModified time="2022-08-06T14:30:00+00:00" />
  <proceeding continued="true">
    <name>Question Time</name>
    <subject>
      <name>Nuclear Waste</name>
      <text id="2016111521245860999c419380000961">
        <heading>Nuclear Waste</heading>
      </text>
      <talker role="member" id="4338" kind="question">
        <name>Mr MARSHALL</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">Dunstan</electorate>
        <portfolios>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Leader of the Opposition</name>
          </portfolio>
        </portfolios>
        <questions>
          <question date="2016-11-15">
            <name>Nuclear Waste</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2016-11-15T14:46:50" />
        <text id="2016111521245860999c419380000962">
          <timeStamp time="2016-11-15T14:46:50" />
          <by role="member" id="4338">Mr MARSHALL (Dunstan—Leader of the Opposition) (14:46):</by>  My question is to the Premier. How much taxpayers' money will be spent by the government in pursuing the Premier's proposal for a nuclear waste dump through a referendum?</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="1812" kind="answer">
        <name>The Hon. J.W. WEATHERILL</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">Cheltenham</electorate>
        <portfolios>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Premier</name>
          </portfolio>
        </portfolios>
        <questions>
          <question date="2016-11-15">
            <name>Nuclear Waste</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2016-11-15T14:47:02" />
        <text id="2016111521245860999c419380000963">
          <timeStamp time="2016-11-15T14:47:02" />
          <by role="member" id="1812">The Hon. J.W. WEATHERILL (Cheltenham—Premier) (14:47):</by>  There will be no referendum until those opposite ensure that they provide a bipartisan position in relation to this matter. I know that those opposite would like a hot and sweaty debate. I know they would like to be standing out there with those people, painted out, in their gas masks, for a photo opportunity. I know that they are great pictures for the TV, and it is a bit of a cut-through message to be out there with the nuclear waste barrels. That's all great fun, and I appreciate that they will be out there with the bongo drums, making sure that lots of noise is made, and that's fine. That's one way of dealing with this debate.</text>
        <text id="2016111521245860999c419380000964">But the truth is that these matters are on a time line, even having regard to the royal commission's report, which is measured in decades, not months or years. What we have done is open an important discussion about South Australia's future. Given the circumstances South Australia faces, we are exploring many options for the future of South Australia. Many of them we have been able to achieve, some of them have been blocked by those opposite, but one consistent factor in all of the things that we have sought to achieve and the things that we have achieved is that the opposition has said no.</text>
        <text id="2016111521245860999c419380000965">They have said no to every significant change or piece of infrastructure that we have built in South Australia. The Leader of the Opposition has clipped himself to his new friends, who will quickly work out that he is no friend at all and that they cannot rely upon his policy position in relation to this matter, nor can they rely upon his policy position in relation to any other matter, because it could change at a whim. There is only one thing we know about the Leader of the Opposition, the big fact that has been found through this whole inquiry: the Leader of the Opposition will withstand anything except pressure.</text>
      </talker>
    </subject>
  </proceeding>
</hansard>