<!--The Official Report of Parliamentary Debates (Hansard) of the Legislative Council and the House of Assembly of the Parliament of South Australia are covered by parliamentary privilege. Republication by others is not afforded the same protection and may result in exposure to legal liability if the material is defamatory. You may copy and make use of excerpts of proceedings where (1) you attribute the Parliament as the source, (2) you assume the risk of liability if the manner of your use is defamatory, (3) you do not use the material for the purpose of advertising, satire or ridicule, or to misrepresent members of Parliament, and (4) your use of the extracts is fair, accurate and not misleading. Copyright in the Official Report of Parliamentary Debates is held by the Attorney-General of South Australia.-->
<hansard id="" tocId="" xml:lang="EN-AU" schemaVersion="1.0" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xml="http://www.w3.org/XML/1998/namespace" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2007/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="hansard_1_0.xsd">
  <name>House of Assembly</name>
  <date date="2016-11-03" />
  <sessionName>Fifty-Third Parliament, Second Session (53-2)</sessionName>
  <parliamentNum>53</parliamentNum>
  <sessionNum>2</sessionNum>
  <parliamentName>Parliament of South Australia</parliamentName>
  <house>House of Assembly</house>
  <venue></venue>
  <reviewStage>published</reviewStage>
  <startPage num="7621" />
  <endPage num="7714" />
  <dateModified time="2022-08-06T14:30:00+00:00" />
  <proceeding continued="true">
    <name>Question Time</name>
    <subject>
      <name>Repatriation General Hospital</name>
      <page num="7657" />
      <text id="201611038474e74e936b4d9e80000516">
        <heading>Repatriation General Hospital</heading>
      </text>
      <talker role="member" id="1807" kind="question">
        <name>Dr McFETRIDGE</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">Morphett</electorate>
        <questions>
          <question date="2016-11-03">
            <name>Repatriation General Hospital</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2016-11-03T14:30:14" />
        <text id="201611038474e74e936b4d9e80000517">
          <timeStamp time="2016-11-03T14:30:14" />
          <by role="member" id="1807">Dr McFETRIDGE (Morphett) (14:30):</by>  Again to the Minister for Health: does the minister stand by his statement that there will be no retail services on the Repatriation General Hospital site after the government's sale of the Daw Park site?</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="627" kind="answer">
        <name>The Hon. J.J. SNELLING</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">Playford</electorate>
        <portfolios>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Health</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for the Arts</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Health Industries</name>
          </portfolio>
        </portfolios>
        <questions>
          <question date="2016-11-03">
            <name>Repatriation General Hospital</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2016-11-03T14:30:28" />
        <text id="201611038474e74e936b4d9e80000518">
          <timeStamp time="2016-11-03T14:30:28" />
          <by role="member" id="627">The Hon. J.J. SNELLING (Playford—Minister for Health, Minister for the Arts, Minister for Health Industries) (14:30):</by>  I don't know if that is quite the word I said. What I said was that there wouldn't be a bulky goods-type development on the site, because obviously that was a concern. Obviously, it would be well within ACH's remit to have cafes and things like that. So no, I wouldn't completely rule out retail, but I have always been quite clear that the government's intention was for the site to be re-used as a health/aged-care type of precinct and that is certainly what the ACH submission provides for.</text>
      </talker>
    </subject>
  </proceeding>
</hansard>