<!--The Official Report of Parliamentary Debates (Hansard) of the Legislative Council and the House of Assembly of the Parliament of South Australia are covered by parliamentary privilege. Republication by others is not afforded the same protection and may result in exposure to legal liability if the material is defamatory. You may copy and make use of excerpts of proceedings where (1) you attribute the Parliament as the source, (2) you assume the risk of liability if the manner of your use is defamatory, (3) you do not use the material for the purpose of advertising, satire or ridicule, or to misrepresent members of Parliament, and (4) your use of the extracts is fair, accurate and not misleading. Copyright in the Official Report of Parliamentary Debates is held by the Attorney-General of South Australia.-->
<hansard id="" tocId="" xml:lang="EN-AU" schemaVersion="1.0" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xml="http://www.w3.org/XML/1998/namespace" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2007/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="hansard_1_0.xsd">
  <name>House of Assembly</name>
  <date date="2016-11-02" />
  <sessionName>Fifty-Third Parliament, Second Session (53-2)</sessionName>
  <parliamentNum>53</parliamentNum>
  <sessionNum>2</sessionNum>
  <parliamentName>Parliament of South Australia</parliamentName>
  <house>House of Assembly</house>
  <venue></venue>
  <reviewStage>published</reviewStage>
  <startPage num="7503" />
  <endPage num="7620" />
  <dateModified time="2022-08-06T14:30:00+00:00" />
  <proceeding continued="true">
    <name>Estimates Replies</name>
    <subject>
      <name>Techport Australia</name>
      <text id="2016110262b11eb45bf64501a0001703">
        <inserted>
          <heading>Techport Australia</heading>
        </inserted>
      </text>
      <talker role="member" id="4342" kind="question">
        <name>In reply to Mr VAN HOLST PELLEKAAN</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">Stuart</electorate>
        <questions>
          <question date="2016-11-02">
            <name>Techport Australia</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <text id="2016110262b11eb45bf64501a0001704">
          <inserted>In reply to <by role="member" id="4342">Mr VAN HOLST PELLEKAAN (Stuart)</by> (2 August 2016).  (Estimates Committee B)</inserted>
        </text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="631" kind="answer">
        <name>The Hon. M.L.J. HAMILTON-SMITH</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">Waite</electorate>
        <portfolios>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Investment and Trade</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Small Business</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Defence Industries</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Veterans' Affairs</name>
          </portfolio>
        </portfolios>
        <questions>
          <question date="2016-11-02">
            <name>Techport Australia</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <text id="2016110262b11eb45bf64501a0001705">
          <inserted>
            <by role="member" id="631">The Hon. M.L.J. HAMILTON-SMITH (Waite—Minister for Investment and Trade, Minister for Small Business, Minister for Defence Industries, Minister for Veterans' Affairs):</by>  All capital works associated with the Techport Australia Common User Facility have now been completed. </inserted>
        </text>
        <text id="2016110262b11eb45bf64501a0001706">
          <inserted>Whilst the CUF has been operational since 2010, a number of residual works have been undertaken since that time to ensure the CUF meets all of the state's obligations under the air warfare destroyer project in an efficient and safe manner. The final components of these works have only been completed in 2015-16 resulting in a delay in Defence SA's ability to undertake a full assessment of the depreciation budget for the CUF. </inserted>
        </text>
        <text id="2016110262b11eb45bf64501a0001707">
          <inserted>The final works completed in 2015-16 were:</inserted>
        </text>
        <text id="2016110262b11eb45bf64501a0001708">
          <item sublevel="1" bullet="true">
            <inserted>Finalisation of construction of Building 12 at a cost of $0.723m.</inserted>
          </item>
        </text>
        <text id="2016110262b11eb45bf64501a0001709">
          <item sublevel="1" bullet="true">
            <inserted>Finalisation of installation of a Cathodic Protection system to protect the wharf and ship lift piling from corrosion costing $1.876m.</inserted>
          </item>
        </text>
        <text id="2016110262b11eb45bf64501a0001710">
          <inserted>Following completion of these final residual works, Defence SA undertook a review of the budgeted depreciation charge taking account of the final capitalised values and assessed useful lives of all assets. The result of this assessment was a reduction in the budgeted depreciation charge for 2016-17 of $0.170m and an ongoing reduction in the annual depreciation charge of $0.160m.</inserted>
        </text>
        <text id="2016110262b11eb45bf64501a0001711">
          <inserted>The adjustment was rounded to the nearest $0.100m for variance explanation purposes.</inserted>
        </text>
      </talker>
    </subject>
  </proceeding>
</hansard>