<!--The Official Report of Parliamentary Debates (Hansard) of the Legislative Council and the House of Assembly of the Parliament of South Australia are covered by parliamentary privilege. Republication by others is not afforded the same protection and may result in exposure to legal liability if the material is defamatory. You may copy and make use of excerpts of proceedings where (1) you attribute the Parliament as the source, (2) you assume the risk of liability if the manner of your use is defamatory, (3) you do not use the material for the purpose of advertising, satire or ridicule, or to misrepresent members of Parliament, and (4) your use of the extracts is fair, accurate and not misleading. Copyright in the Official Report of Parliamentary Debates is held by the Attorney-General of South Australia.-->
<hansard id="" tocId="" xml:lang="EN-AU" schemaVersion="1.0" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xml="http://www.w3.org/XML/1998/namespace" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2007/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="hansard_1_0.xsd">
  <name>House of Assembly</name>
  <date date="2016-11-02" />
  <sessionName>Fifty-Third Parliament, Second Session (53-2)</sessionName>
  <parliamentNum>53</parliamentNum>
  <sessionNum>2</sessionNum>
  <parliamentName>Parliament of South Australia</parliamentName>
  <house>House of Assembly</house>
  <venue></venue>
  <reviewStage>published</reviewStage>
  <startPage num="7503" />
  <endPage num="7620" />
  <dateModified time="2022-08-06T14:30:00+00:00" />
  <proceeding continued="true">
    <name>Question Time</name>
    <subject>
      <name>Attorney-General's Department Relocation</name>
      <text id="20161102b07e6a254a2247f5a0000669">
        <heading>Attorney-General's Department Relocation</heading>
      </text>
      <talker role="member" id="1804" kind="question">
        <name>Ms CHAPMAN</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">Bragg</electorate>
        <portfolios>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Deputy Leader of the Opposition</name>
          </portfolio>
        </portfolios>
        <questions>
          <question date="2016-11-02">
            <name>Attorney-General's Department Relocation</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2016-11-02T14:50:19" />
        <text id="20161102b07e6a254a2247f5a0000670">
          <timeStamp time="2016-11-02T14:50:19" />
          <by role="member" id="1804">Ms CHAPMAN (Bragg—Deputy Leader of the Opposition) (14:50):</by>  My question is to the Attorney-General. When did the Attorney agree to relocate the Attorney-General's Department to the proposed new building on Franklin Street, and when does the current lease expire?</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="4842" kind="answer">
        <name>The Hon. S.C. MULLIGHAN</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">Lee</electorate>
        <portfolios>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Transport and Infrastructure</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Housing and Urban Development</name>
          </portfolio>
        </portfolios>
        <questions>
          <question date="2016-11-02">
            <name>Attorney-General's Department Relocation</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2016-11-02T14:50:39" />
        <text id="20161102b07e6a254a2247f5a0000671">
          <timeStamp time="2016-11-02T14:50:39" />
          <by role="member" id="4842">The Hon. S.C. MULLIGHAN (Lee—Minister for Transport and Infrastructure, Minister for Housing and Urban Development) (14:50):</by>  As the deputy leader may be aware, the Department of Planning, Transport and Infrastructure manages commercial office accommodation—indeed, many other forms of building accommodation on behalf of other government agencies. My understanding is that the government approached the market through a tender call for accommodation for the Attorney-General's Department, and out of that response the proponent which was subsequently awarded the leasing arrangement was the one which enables the next stage of the GPO precinct development to occur. As part of those arrangements, not only will that—</text>
        <text id="20161102b07e6a254a2247f5a0000672">
          <event kind="interjection" role="member" id="614">The Hon. J.M. Rankine interjecting:</event>
        </text>
      </talker>
      <talker kind="speech" role="office">
        <name>The Speaker</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20161102b07e6a254a2247f5a0000673">
          <by role="office">The SPEAKER:</by>  The member for Wright is called to order.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="4842" kind="answer" continued="true">
        <name>The Hon. S.C. MULLIGHAN</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20161102b07e6a254a2247f5a0000674">
          <by role="member" id="4842">The Hon. S.C. MULLIGHAN:</by>  —proponent be required to construct that building and fit it out, which will obviously occur over a period of some years—in fact, I think it is approximately three years plus a fit-out period—that has required the government to continue our lease arrangement at 45 Pirie Street. The length of that lease arrangement to continue AGD's tenancy at 45 Pirie Street while that future premises is being constructed and fitted out, I just can't quite recall off the top of my head. but I will come back and provide that to the deputy leader.</text>
      </talker>
    </subject>
  </proceeding>
</hansard>