<!--The Official Report of Parliamentary Debates (Hansard) of the Legislative Council and the House of Assembly of the Parliament of South Australia are covered by parliamentary privilege. Republication by others is not afforded the same protection and may result in exposure to legal liability if the material is defamatory. You may copy and make use of excerpts of proceedings where (1) you attribute the Parliament as the source, (2) you assume the risk of liability if the manner of your use is defamatory, (3) you do not use the material for the purpose of advertising, satire or ridicule, or to misrepresent members of Parliament, and (4) your use of the extracts is fair, accurate and not misleading. Copyright in the Official Report of Parliamentary Debates is held by the Attorney-General of South Australia.-->
<hansard id="" tocId="" xml:lang="EN-AU" schemaVersion="1.0" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xml="http://www.w3.org/XML/1998/namespace" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2007/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="hansard_1_0.xsd">
  <name>House of Assembly</name>
  <date date="2016-11-01" />
  <sessionName>Fifty-Third Parliament, Second Session (53-2)</sessionName>
  <parliamentNum>53</parliamentNum>
  <sessionNum>2</sessionNum>
  <parliamentName>Parliament of South Australia</parliamentName>
  <house>House of Assembly</house>
  <venue></venue>
  <reviewStage>published</reviewStage>
  <startPage num="7421" />
  <endPage num="7502" />
  <dateModified time="2022-08-06T14:30:00+00:00" />
  <proceeding continued="true">
    <name>Estimates Replies</name>
    <subject>
      <name>Future Fund</name>
      <text id="20161101cd0917b2a10048eab0001154">
        <inserted>
          <heading>Future Fund</heading>
        </inserted>
      </text>
      <talker role="member" id="4338" kind="question">
        <name>In reply to Mr MARSHALL</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">Dunstan</electorate>
        <portfolios>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Leader of the Opposition</name>
          </portfolio>
        </portfolios>
        <questions>
          <question date="2016-11-01">
            <name>Future Fund</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <text id="20161101cd0917b2a10048eab0001155">
          <inserted>In reply to <by role="member" id="4338">Mr MARSHALL (Dunstan—Leader of the Opposition)</by> (28 July 2016).  (Estimates Committee A)</inserted>
        </text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="1812" kind="answer">
        <name>The Hon. J.W. WEATHERILL</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">Cheltenham</electorate>
        <portfolios>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Premier</name>
          </portfolio>
        </portfolios>
        <questions>
          <question date="2016-11-01">
            <name>Future Fund</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <text id="20161101cd0917b2a10048eab0001156">
          <inserted>
            <by role="member" id="1812">The Hon. J.W. WEATHERILL (Cheltenham—Premier):</by>  I have been advised:</inserted>
        </text>
        <text id="20161101cd0917b2a10048eab0001157">
          <inserted>A Future Fund model has been developed that sets aside a portion of royalty revenues (taking into account horizontal fiscal equalisation) and above trend growth in taxation and GST revenues, subject to the achievement of a net operating surplus. Under the model, additional monies could also be contributed to the fund at the discretion of the Treasurer.</inserted>
        </text>
        <text id="20161101cd0917b2a10048eab0001158">
          <inserted>A bill based on this model has been drafted. The introduction of the bill is pending the government's response to the Nuclear Fuel Cycle Royal Commission.</inserted>
        </text>
        <text id="20161101cd0917b2a10048eab0001159">
          <inserted>The need for a Future Fund has become less urgent given the current trends of the mining industry.</inserted>
        </text>
        <text id="20161101cd0917b2a10048eab0001160">
          <inserted>The commission's report, delivered in May 2016, proposed the establishment of a State Wealth Fund to ensure that the economic benefits associated with an inter-generational nuclear waste storage facility will flow to future generations of South Australians and also a Reserve Fund, to provide for the costs of decommissioning, remediation, closure of the facility and long-term monitoring. </inserted>
        </text>
        <text id="20161101cd0917b2a10048eab0001161">
          <inserted>The government's response to the royal commission's report will be informed by extensive statewide community engagement and consultation, including two citizens' juries.</inserted>
        </text>
      </talker>
    </subject>
  </proceeding>
</hansard>