<!--The Official Report of Parliamentary Debates (Hansard) of the Legislative Council and the House of Assembly of the Parliament of South Australia are covered by parliamentary privilege. Republication by others is not afforded the same protection and may result in exposure to legal liability if the material is defamatory. You may copy and make use of excerpts of proceedings where (1) you attribute the Parliament as the source, (2) you assume the risk of liability if the manner of your use is defamatory, (3) you do not use the material for the purpose of advertising, satire or ridicule, or to misrepresent members of Parliament, and (4) your use of the extracts is fair, accurate and not misleading. Copyright in the Official Report of Parliamentary Debates is held by the Attorney-General of South Australia.-->
<hansard id="" tocId="" xml:lang="EN-AU" schemaVersion="1.0" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xml="http://www.w3.org/XML/1998/namespace" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2007/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="hansard_1_0.xsd">
  <name>House of Assembly</name>
  <date date="2016-11-01" />
  <sessionName>Fifty-Third Parliament, Second Session (53-2)</sessionName>
  <parliamentNum>53</parliamentNum>
  <sessionNum>2</sessionNum>
  <parliamentName>Parliament of South Australia</parliamentName>
  <house>House of Assembly</house>
  <venue></venue>
  <reviewStage>published</reviewStage>
  <startPage num="7421" />
  <endPage num="7502" />
  <dateModified time="2022-08-06T14:30:00+00:00" />
  <proceeding continued="true">
    <name>Question Time</name>
    <subject>
      <name>Nuclear Waste</name>
      <text id="2016110173ae7ff089874f3a90000573">
        <heading>Nuclear Waste</heading>
      </text>
      <talker role="member" id="4342" kind="question">
        <name>Mr VAN HOLST PELLEKAAN</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">Stuart</electorate>
        <questions>
          <question date="2016-11-01">
            <name>Nuclear Waste</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2016-11-01T13:58:31" />
        <text id="2016110173ae7ff089874f3a90000574">
          <timeStamp time="2016-11-01T13:58:31" />
          <by role="member" id="4342">Mr VAN HOLST PELLEKAAN (Stuart) (13:58):</by>  My question is for the Premier. Will the Premier still pursue the potential for South Australia to import and permanently store high-level radioactive waste regardless of whether the state Labor Party supports the proposal at its upcoming special convention?</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="1812" kind="answer">
        <name>The Hon. J.W. WEATHERILL</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">Cheltenham</electorate>
        <portfolios>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Premier</name>
          </portfolio>
        </portfolios>
        <questions>
          <question date="2016-11-01">
            <name>Nuclear Waste</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2016-11-01T13:59:08" />
        <text id="2016110173ae7ff089874f3a90000575">
          <timeStamp time="2016-11-01T13:59:08" />
          <by role="member" id="1812">The Hon. J.W. WEATHERILL (Cheltenham—Premier) (13:59):</by>  We just had a convention. I will just give you a bit of a short tutorial on internal Labor Party matters—</text>
        <text id="2016110173ae7ff089874f3a90000576">
          <event kind="interjection">Members interjecting:</event>
        </text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="1812" kind="answer" continued="true">
        <name>The Hon. J.W. WEATHERILL</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <page num="7456" />
        <text id="2016110173ae7ff089874f3a90000577">
          <by role="member" id="1812">The Hon. J.W. WEATHERILL:</by>  —that's right, just a primer, basically—and that is that the Labor Party supported their leader. On the proposition that, if there is to be a change in policy, it should be presented to a special convention, I don't expect that that will happen anytime soon.</text>
        <text id="2016110173ae7ff089874f3a90000578">We are part way through a consultation process. We are presently in the citizens' jury phase of that. We are yet to see what emerges from even that process. The state government is yet to settle a position which will be in part informed by what the citizens' jury has developed as a consequence of this statewide consultation. So, we are a long way from settling a position that would then require us to approach a party conference asking us to alter our position in relation to the storage of nuclear waste. Presently, the party position doesn't present any barrier to us taking the next steps.</text>
      </talker>
    </subject>
  </proceeding>
</hansard>