<!--The Official Report of Parliamentary Debates (Hansard) of the Legislative Council and the House of Assembly of the Parliament of South Australia are covered by parliamentary privilege. Republication by others is not afforded the same protection and may result in exposure to legal liability if the material is defamatory. You may copy and make use of excerpts of proceedings where (1) you attribute the Parliament as the source, (2) you assume the risk of liability if the manner of your use is defamatory, (3) you do not use the material for the purpose of advertising, satire or ridicule, or to misrepresent members of Parliament, and (4) your use of the extracts is fair, accurate and not misleading. Copyright in the Official Report of Parliamentary Debates is held by the Attorney-General of South Australia.-->
<hansard id="" tocId="" xml:lang="EN-AU" schemaVersion="1.0" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xml="http://www.w3.org/XML/1998/namespace" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2007/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="hansard_1_0.xsd">
  <name>House of Assembly</name>
  <date date="2016-11-01" />
  <sessionName>Fifty-Third Parliament, Second Session (53-2)</sessionName>
  <parliamentNum>53</parliamentNum>
  <sessionNum>2</sessionNum>
  <parliamentName>Parliament of South Australia</parliamentName>
  <house>House of Assembly</house>
  <venue></venue>
  <reviewStage>published</reviewStage>
  <startPage num="7421" />
  <endPage num="7502" />
  <dateModified time="2022-08-06T14:30:00+00:00" />
  <proceeding continued="true">
    <name>Question Time</name>
    <subject>
      <name>Gillman Land Sale</name>
      <text id="201611013e84070dba6d44a190000517">
        <heading>Gillman Land Sale</heading>
      </text>
      <talker role="member" id="1804" kind="question">
        <name>Ms CHAPMAN</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">Bragg</electorate>
        <portfolios>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Deputy Leader of the Opposition</name>
          </portfolio>
        </portfolios>
        <questions>
          <question date="2016-11-01">
            <name>Gillman Land Sale</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2016-11-01T13:46:47" />
        <text id="201611013e84070dba6d44a190000518">
          <timeStamp time="2016-11-01T13:46:47" />
          <by role="member" id="1804">Ms CHAPMAN (Bragg—Deputy Leader of the Opposition) (13:46):</by>  Supplementary: is it the minister's understanding that the responsibility now, and control, in respect of the arrangements for resale of the Gillman site will be that of the Renewal SA board, and, if so, is it your understanding that they will be proceeding with the resale under the terms of the master plan which they had commissioned back in mid-2013?</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="4842" kind="answer">
        <name>The Hon. S.C. MULLIGHAN</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">Lee</electorate>
        <portfolios>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Transport and Infrastructure</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Housing and Urban Development</name>
          </portfolio>
        </portfolios>
        <questions>
          <question date="2016-11-01">
            <name>Gillman Land Sale</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2016-11-01T13:47:18" />
        <text id="201611013e84070dba6d44a190000519">
          <timeStamp time="2016-11-01T13:47:18" />
          <by role="member" id="4842">The Hon. S.C. MULLIGHAN (Lee—Minister for Transport and Infrastructure, Minister for Housing and Urban Development) (13:47):</by>  As I pointed out, I believe in my ministerial statement and also in my previous answer: yes, I think both the Renewal SA board and the government understand that Renewal SA will be superintending the sale process. They will be managing that sale process. We would anticipate it is done according to the state's objectives which, in very broad terms, include seeking proposals from proponents which provide for employment creation consistent with the state's economic objectives. That is it in broad terms.</text>
        <text id="201611013e84070dba6d44a190000520">If the deputy leader would like a reconciliation between the sale process and all the elements of the master planning process which has previously been undertaken, I will see if I can provide that reconciliation to the deputy leader and bring that back to the house.</text>
      </talker>
    </subject>
  </proceeding>
</hansard>