<!--The Official Report of Parliamentary Debates (Hansard) of the Legislative Council and the House of Assembly of the Parliament of South Australia are covered by parliamentary privilege. Republication by others is not afforded the same protection and may result in exposure to legal liability if the material is defamatory. You may copy and make use of excerpts of proceedings where (1) you attribute the Parliament as the source, (2) you assume the risk of liability if the manner of your use is defamatory, (3) you do not use the material for the purpose of advertising, satire or ridicule, or to misrepresent members of Parliament, and (4) your use of the extracts is fair, accurate and not misleading. Copyright in the Official Report of Parliamentary Debates is held by the Attorney-General of South Australia.-->
<hansard id="" tocId="" xml:lang="EN-AU" schemaVersion="1.0" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xml="http://www.w3.org/XML/1998/namespace" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2007/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="hansard_1_0.xsd">
  <name>House of Assembly</name>
  <date date="2016-11-01" />
  <sessionName>Fifty-Third Parliament, Second Session (53-2)</sessionName>
  <parliamentNum>53</parliamentNum>
  <sessionNum>2</sessionNum>
  <parliamentName>Parliament of South Australia</parliamentName>
  <house>House of Assembly</house>
  <venue></venue>
  <reviewStage>published</reviewStage>
  <startPage num="7421" />
  <endPage num="7502" />
  <dateModified time="2022-08-06T14:30:00+00:00" />
  <proceeding continued="true">
    <name>Question Time</name>
    <subject>
      <name>Gillman Land Sale</name>
      <text id="20161101dec1969627af4cfea0000514">
        <heading>Gillman Land Sale</heading>
      </text>
      <talker role="member" id="1804" kind="question">
        <name>Ms CHAPMAN</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">Bragg</electorate>
        <portfolios>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Deputy Leader of the Opposition</name>
          </portfolio>
        </portfolios>
        <questions>
          <question date="2016-11-01">
            <name>Gillman Land Sale</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2016-11-01T13:45:40" />
        <text id="20161101dec1969627af4cfea0000515">
          <timeStamp time="2016-11-01T13:45:40" />
          <by role="member" id="1804">Ms CHAPMAN (Bragg—Deputy Leader of the Opposition) (13:45):</by>  My question is to the Minister for Housing and Urban Development. Has the minister received any advice from the Renewal SA board on the proposed arrangements for the resale of the Gillman site, and, if you haven't, have you asked?</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="4842" kind="answer">
        <name>The Hon. S.C. MULLIGHAN</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">Lee</electorate>
        <portfolios>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Transport and Infrastructure</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Housing and Urban Development</name>
          </portfolio>
        </portfolios>
        <questions>
          <question date="2016-11-01">
            <name>Gillman Land Sale</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2016-11-01T13:45:59" />
        <text id="20161101dec1969627af4cfea0000516">
          <timeStamp time="2016-11-01T13:45:59" />
          <by role="member" id="4842">The Hon. S.C. MULLIGHAN (Lee—Minister for Transport and Infrastructure, Minister for Housing and Urban Development) (13:45):</by>  My understanding is that this matter was considered yesterday by the Renewal SA board. As far as I am aware, there is a common understanding between the government and the Renewal SA board that Renewal SA will manage the sale process going forward—the issuing of expressions of interest and all of the processes that follow that. As to the content and the nature of the discussion, given that it only happened yesterday at board level, I have not received advice on exactly either that board paper or the nature of the discussion but, when I do, I am happy to provide it to the deputy leader.</text>
      </talker>
    </subject>
  </proceeding>
</hansard>