<!--The Official Report of Parliamentary Debates (Hansard) of the Legislative Council and the House of Assembly of the Parliament of South Australia are covered by parliamentary privilege. Republication by others is not afforded the same protection and may result in exposure to legal liability if the material is defamatory. You may copy and make use of excerpts of proceedings where (1) you attribute the Parliament as the source, (2) you assume the risk of liability if the manner of your use is defamatory, (3) you do not use the material for the purpose of advertising, satire or ridicule, or to misrepresent members of Parliament, and (4) your use of the extracts is fair, accurate and not misleading. Copyright in the Official Report of Parliamentary Debates is held by the Attorney-General of South Australia.-->
<hansard id="" tocId="" xml:lang="EN-AU" schemaVersion="1.0" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xml="http://www.w3.org/XML/1998/namespace" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2007/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="hansard_1_0.xsd">
  <name>House of Assembly</name>
  <date date="2016-10-18" />
  <sessionName>Fifty-Third Parliament, Second Session (53-2)</sessionName>
  <parliamentNum>53</parliamentNum>
  <sessionNum>2</sessionNum>
  <parliamentName>Parliament of South Australia</parliamentName>
  <house>House of Assembly</house>
  <venue></venue>
  <reviewStage>published</reviewStage>
  <startPage num="7185" />
  <endPage num="7261" />
  <dateModified time="2022-08-06T14:30:00+00:00" />
  <proceeding continued="true">
    <name>Question Time</name>
    <subject>
      <name>Alinta Energy</name>
      <text id="20161018cc9f5b7a82324aea90000683">
        <heading>Alinta Energy</heading>
      </text>
      <talker role="member" id="4342" kind="question">
        <name>Mr VAN HOLST PELLEKAAN</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">Stuart</electorate>
        <questions>
          <question date="2016-10-18">
            <name>Alinta Energy</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2016-10-18T15:18:39" />
        <text id="20161018cc9f5b7a82324aea90000684">
          <timeStamp time="2016-10-18T15:18:39" />
          <by role="member" id="4342">Mr VAN HOLST PELLEKAAN (Stuart) (15:18):</by>  Given the minister's answer about the federal government and Holden, why didn't he accept Alinta's proposal to save the Northern Power Station?</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="633" kind="answer">
        <name>The Hon. A. KOUTSANTONIS</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">West Torrens</electorate>
        <portfolios>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Finance</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for State Development</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Mineral Resources and Energy</name>
          </portfolio>
        </portfolios>
        <questions>
          <question date="2016-10-18">
            <name>Alinta Energy</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2016-10-18T15:18:48" />
        <page num="7228" />
        <text id="20161018cc9f5b7a82324aea90000685">
          <timeStamp time="2016-10-18T15:18:48" />
          <by role="member" id="633">The Hon. A. KOUTSANTONIS (West Torrens—Treasurer, Minister for Finance, Minister for State Development, Minister for Mineral Resources and Energy) (15:18):</by>  Again because if we subsidised one power station in times of higher peak demand, every power station would then of course ask for that same subsidy, to a point that the state would not be able to afford to do it. We would have rolling blackouts daily over summer, and on top of that you would see South Australia as a place where of course industry could not grow.</text>
        <text id="20161018cc9f5b7a82324aea90000686">Imagine the scenario the opposition are talking about. The scenario is this: we subsidise Northern, they come on, they use tax dollars to operate after members opposite privatise them, they operate, and then AGL, Origin or Simply come to us and say, 'Tomorrow is going to be 45° and it has been 45° for the last three days in a row. Unless you pay us these payments, we're not going to turn on.'</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="4339" kind="interjection">
        <name>Mr Whetstone</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20161018cc9f5b7a82324aea90000687">
          <by role="member" id="4339">Mr Whetstone:</by>  That's hypothetical.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="633" kind="answer" continued="true">
        <name>The Hon. A. KOUTSANTONIS</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20161018cc9f5b7a82324aea90000688">
          <by role="member" id="633">The Hon. A. KOUTSANTONIS:</by>  That's hypothetical—while bringing Northern back on, these are not hypothetical questions. They are completely—</text>
        <text id="20161018cc9f5b7a82324aea90000689">
          <event kind="interjection" role="member" id="3124">Mr Pisoni interjecting:</event>
        </text>
      </talker>
      <talker kind="speech" role="office">
        <name>The Speaker</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20161018cc9f5b7a82324aea90000690">
          <by role="office">The SPEAKER:</by>  The member for Unley is called to order.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="633" kind="answer" continued="true">
        <name>The Hon. A. KOUTSANTONIS</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20161018cc9f5b7a82324aea90000691">
          <by role="member" id="633">The Hon. A. KOUTSANTONIS:</by>  —adrift and at sea on energy policy. It is incoherent. Let's not forget that turning Northern on was not a suggestion of the shadow minister or the Leader of the Opposition, it was the federal resources minister. They are singing his tune. They can't stand up to Canberra. They never can. They can't say no. It was a thought bubble that they vomited onto the front page of—</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="4343">
        <name>Mr GARDNER</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20161018cc9f5b7a82324aea90000692">
          <by role="member" id="4343">Mr GARDNER:</by>  Point of order, Mr Speaker: standing order 98. The Treasurer is straying.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker kind="speech" role="office">
        <name>The Speaker</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20161018cc9f5b7a82324aea90000693">
          <by role="office">The SPEAKER:</by>  Treasurer, I uphold the point of order.</text>
      </talker>
    </subject>
  </proceeding>
</hansard>