<!--The Official Report of Parliamentary Debates (Hansard) of the Legislative Council and the House of Assembly of the Parliament of South Australia are covered by parliamentary privilege. Republication by others is not afforded the same protection and may result in exposure to legal liability if the material is defamatory. You may copy and make use of excerpts of proceedings where (1) you attribute the Parliament as the source, (2) you assume the risk of liability if the manner of your use is defamatory, (3) you do not use the material for the purpose of advertising, satire or ridicule, or to misrepresent members of Parliament, and (4) your use of the extracts is fair, accurate and not misleading. Copyright in the Official Report of Parliamentary Debates is held by the Attorney-General of South Australia.-->
<hansard id="" tocId="" xml:lang="EN-AU" schemaVersion="1.0" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xml="http://www.w3.org/XML/1998/namespace" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2007/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="hansard_1_0.xsd">
  <name>House of Assembly</name>
  <date date="2016-10-18" />
  <sessionName>Fifty-Third Parliament, Second Session (53-2)</sessionName>
  <parliamentNum>53</parliamentNum>
  <sessionNum>2</sessionNum>
  <parliamentName>Parliament of South Australia</parliamentName>
  <house>House of Assembly</house>
  <venue></venue>
  <reviewStage>published</reviewStage>
  <startPage num="7185" />
  <endPage num="7261" />
  <dateModified time="2022-08-06T14:30:00+00:00" />
  <proceeding continued="true">
    <name>Question Time</name>
    <subject>
      <name>Port Augusta Power Stations</name>
      <text id="20161018c2e504f240374ad090000548">
        <heading>Port Augusta Power Stations</heading>
      </text>
      <talker role="member" id="4338" kind="question">
        <name>Mr MARSHALL</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">Dunstan</electorate>
        <portfolios>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Leader of the Opposition</name>
          </portfolio>
        </portfolios>
        <questions>
          <question date="2016-10-18">
            <name>Port Augusta Power Stations</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2016-10-18T14:48:50" />
        <text id="20161018c2e504f240374ad090000549">
          <timeStamp time="2016-10-18T14:48:50" />
          <by role="member" id="4338">Mr MARSHALL (Dunstan—Leader of the Opposition) (14:48):</by>  My question is to the Minister for Mineral Resources and Energy. Have representatives of government or the minister's office met with private companies to discuss potentially reopening Port Augusta?</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="633" kind="answer">
        <name>The Hon. A. KOUTSANTONIS</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">West Torrens</electorate>
        <portfolios>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Finance</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for State Development</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Mineral Resources and Energy</name>
          </portfolio>
        </portfolios>
        <questions>
          <question date="2016-10-18">
            <name>Port Augusta Power Stations</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2016-10-18T14:49:04" />
        <page num="7220" />
        <text id="20161018c2e504f240374ad090000550">
          <timeStamp time="2016-10-18T14:49:04" />
          <by role="member" id="633">The Hon. A. KOUTSANTONIS (West Torrens—Treasurer, Minister for Finance, Minister for State Development, Minister for Mineral Resources and Energy) (14:49):</by>  Yes, sir, we have. My message to them is the same as my message to the public: if the private sector want to reopen the Northern Power Station, the government will not stand in their way, but we will not use tax dollars to fire up a coal-fired power station.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="1804" kind="interjection">
        <name>Ms Chapman</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20161018c2e504f240374ad090000551">
          <by role="member" id="1804">Ms Chapman:</by>  We didn't ask you to.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="633" kind="answer" continued="true">
        <name>The Hon. A. KOUTSANTONIS</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20161018c2e504f240374ad090000552">
          <by role="member" id="633">The Hon. A. KOUTSANTONIS:</by>  Really? Well, that is not what the shadow spokesman said.</text>
        <text id="20161018c2e504f240374ad090000553">
          <event kind="interjection">Members interjecting:</event>
        </text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="633" kind="answer" continued="true">
        <name>The Hon. A. KOUTSANTONIS</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20161018c2e504f240374ad090000554">
          <by role="member" id="633">The Hon. A. KOUTSANTONIS:</by>  No, that is not exactly what they said. We are more than happy to meet with anyone who wishes to invest in South Australia, but what we won't be doing is using taxpayers' money to intervene into the National Electricity Market, and—</text>
        <text id="20161018c2e504f240374ad090000555">
          <event kind="interjection">Members interjecting:</event>
        </text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="633" kind="answer" continued="true">
        <name>The Hon. A. KOUTSANTONIS</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20161018c2e504f240374ad090000556">
          <by role="member" id="633">The Hon. A. KOUTSANTONIS:</by>  Well, don't use taxpayers' money to conduct a business case.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="1804" kind="interjection">
        <name>Ms Chapman</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20161018c2e504f240374ad090000557">
          <by role="member" id="1804">Ms Chapman:</by>  Come on, Tom!</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="633" kind="answer" continued="true">
        <name>The Hon. A. KOUTSANTONIS</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20161018c2e504f240374ad090000558">
          <by role="member" id="633">The Hon. A. KOUTSANTONIS:</by>  Notice the hypocrisy—notice the hypocrisy. One minute they're talking about nationalising it—and I pointed out to the house in a debate earlier today that members opposite were calling on us to nationalise the National Electricity Market. So, now the Leader of the Opposition is saying that we shouldn't use taxpayers' money, but his parliamentary secretary is saying we should nationalise it. Which one is it?</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="1804" kind="interjection">
        <name>Ms Chapman</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20161018c2e504f240374ad090000559">
          <by role="member" id="1804">Ms Chapman:</by>  What a joke.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="633" kind="answer" continued="true">
        <name>The Hon. A. KOUTSANTONIS</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20161018c2e504f240374ad090000560">
          <by role="member" id="633">The Hon. A. KOUTSANTONIS:</by>  No, I have to say they are in disarray—they are in disarray. There is no coherent policy. There will be no taxpayers' money used to bring on generation in this state. What we will do, though, is go out to the market to procure our power to incentivise more competition. We believe in an energy intensity scheme to, of course, bring gas-fired generation, efficient gas-fired generation (the transitional fuel) to a renewable future back into the market, as it belongs, because there is a lack of national leadership in this space, and there needs to be national leadership because if there is not national leadership in this space, we will not have reform.</text>
        <text id="20161018c2e504f240374ad090000561">That's why the work that the Prime Minister has done to bring climate and energy policy together is to be commended but, unfortunately, within his party there are still dinosaurs. Dinosaurs still roam the earth next to the unicorns, and there they are longing for coal—</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="4343">
        <name>Mr GARDNER</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20161018c2e504f240374ad090000562">
          <by role="member" id="4343">Mr GARDNER:</by>  Point of order, sir.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker kind="speech" role="office">
        <name>The Speaker</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20161018c2e504f240374ad090000563">
          <by role="office">The SPEAKER:</by>  Point of order.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="4343">
        <name>Mr GARDNER</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20161018c2e504f240374ad090000564">
          <by role="member" id="4343">Mr GARDNER:</by>  I'm not familiar with whether 'unicorn' is unparliamentary language, but it's certainly debate.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker kind="speech" role="office">
        <name>The Speaker</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20161018c2e504f240374ad090000565">
          <by role="office">The SPEAKER:</by>  Yes, I uphold the point of order. Deputy leader.</text>
      </talker>
    </subject>
  </proceeding>
</hansard>