<!--The Official Report of Parliamentary Debates (Hansard) of the Legislative Council and the House of Assembly of the Parliament of South Australia are covered by parliamentary privilege. Republication by others is not afforded the same protection and may result in exposure to legal liability if the material is defamatory. You may copy and make use of excerpts of proceedings where (1) you attribute the Parliament as the source, (2) you assume the risk of liability if the manner of your use is defamatory, (3) you do not use the material for the purpose of advertising, satire or ridicule, or to misrepresent members of Parliament, and (4) your use of the extracts is fair, accurate and not misleading. Copyright in the Official Report of Parliamentary Debates is held by the Attorney-General of South Australia.-->
<hansard id="" tocId="" xml:lang="EN-AU" schemaVersion="1.0" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xml="http://www.w3.org/XML/1998/namespace" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2007/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="hansard_1_0.xsd">
  <name>House of Assembly</name>
  <date date="2016-09-29" />
  <sessionName>Fifty-Third Parliament, Second Session (53-2)</sessionName>
  <parliamentNum>53</parliamentNum>
  <sessionNum>2</sessionNum>
  <parliamentName>Parliament of South Australia</parliamentName>
  <house>House of Assembly</house>
  <venue></venue>
  <reviewStage>published</reviewStage>
  <startPage num="7125" />
  <endPage num="7184" />
  <dateModified time="2022-08-06T14:30:00+00:00" />
  <proceeding continued="true">
    <name>Question Time</name>
    <subject>
      <name>Power Infrastructure</name>
      <text id="201609297e176760c01745ac80000654">
        <heading>Power Infrastructure</heading>
      </text>
      <talker role="member" id="1804" kind="question">
        <name>Ms CHAPMAN</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">Bragg</electorate>
        <portfolios>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Deputy Leader of the Opposition</name>
          </portfolio>
        </portfolios>
        <questions>
          <question date="2016-09-29">
            <name>Power Infrastructure</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2016-09-29T15:06:27" />
        <text id="201609297e176760c01745ac80000655">
          <timeStamp time="2016-09-29T15:06:27" />
          <by role="member" id="1804">Ms CHAPMAN (Bragg—Deputy Leader of the Opposition) (15:06):</by>  My question is to the Minister for Energy. Why does the minister continue to refuse to meet with the Upper Spencer Gulf power consortium, comprising General Electric, the CFMEU and another, who offered to build a new clean coal and biomass power station, with underground transmission lines, from Port Augusta?</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="633" kind="answer">
        <name>The Hon. A. KOUTSANTONIS</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">West Torrens</electorate>
        <portfolios>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Finance</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for State Development</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Mineral Resources and Energy</name>
          </portfolio>
        </portfolios>
        <questions>
          <question date="2016-09-29">
            <name>Power Infrastructure</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2016-09-29T15:06:52" />
        <text id="201609297e176760c01745ac80000656">
          <timeStamp time="2016-09-29T15:06:52" />
          <by role="member" id="633">The Hon. A. KOUTSANTONIS (West Torrens—Treasurer, Minister for Finance, Minister for State Development, Minister for Mineral Resources and Energy) (15:06):</by>  I am happy to meet with anyone. What I won't do is allow money that has been placed for remediation to be used to fund any upgrade. This power station is not owned by the South Australian government: it is owned by a subsidiary now of Alinta. I understand that, if that consortium wishes to buy it, the regulatory approvals that they seek are not from me: they are from the National Electricity Market. Of course, I am happy to meet with them. I am happy to meet with anyone who wants to invest in South Australia.</text>
        <page num="7171" />
        <text id="201609297e176760c01745ac80000657">I have to say that the idea that Northern would have helped with the issue yesterday has been refuted by almost every single independent expert who looks at the National Electricity Market. I think it is important to know that the idea that, if Northern had been on, this would not have occurred, is wrong. It is not only rejected by the government: it is rejected by AEMO and it is rejected by the independent experts who monitor the National Electricity Market. I think there is no-one of any real authority out there saying that if Northern had been on, first, this event would not have occurred and, secondly, power would have been up faster. There is no-one who is prepared to put their name to that. No-one. Why? There is a simple reason: because it is not true.</text>
      </talker>
    </subject>
  </proceeding>
</hansard>