<!--The Official Report of Parliamentary Debates (Hansard) of the Legislative Council and the House of Assembly of the Parliament of South Australia are covered by parliamentary privilege. Republication by others is not afforded the same protection and may result in exposure to legal liability if the material is defamatory. You may copy and make use of excerpts of proceedings where (1) you attribute the Parliament as the source, (2) you assume the risk of liability if the manner of your use is defamatory, (3) you do not use the material for the purpose of advertising, satire or ridicule, or to misrepresent members of Parliament, and (4) your use of the extracts is fair, accurate and not misleading. Copyright in the Official Report of Parliamentary Debates is held by the Attorney-General of South Australia.-->
<hansard id="" tocId="" xml:lang="EN-AU" schemaVersion="1.0" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xml="http://www.w3.org/XML/1998/namespace" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2007/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="hansard_1_0.xsd">
  <name>House of Assembly</name>
  <date date="2016-09-28" />
  <sessionName>Fifty-Third Parliament, Second Session (53-2)</sessionName>
  <parliamentNum>53</parliamentNum>
  <sessionNum>2</sessionNum>
  <parliamentName>Parliament of South Australia</parliamentName>
  <house>House of Assembly</house>
  <venue></venue>
  <reviewStage>published</reviewStage>
  <startPage num="7063" />
  <endPage num="7123" />
  <dateModified time="2022-08-06T14:30:00+00:00" />
  <proceeding continued="true">
    <name>Question Time</name>
    <subject>
      <name>School Absenteeism</name>
      <text id="2016092832f5d142a7534d19b0000469">
        <heading>School Absenteeism</heading>
      </text>
      <talker role="member" id="4343" kind="question">
        <name>Mr GARDNER</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">Morialta</electorate>
        <questions>
          <question date="2016-09-28">
            <name>School Absenteeism</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2016-09-28T14:43:50" />
        <text id="2016092832f5d142a7534d19b0000470">
          <timeStamp time="2016-09-28T14:43:50" />
          <by role="member" id="4343">Mr GARDNER (Morialta) (14:43):</by>  A final supplementary: in relation to the minister's promises in relation to truancy and, in particular, the policy announcement in the Friday <term>Advertiser</term> a couple of weeks ago, can the minister identify when the government took that decision to seek to increase the fine to $5,000 and introduce a system of expiation notices, given that when we discussed this matter in estimates the minister suggested that maybe the expiation notices were not going to go ahead?</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="4622" kind="answer">
        <name>The Hon. S.E. CLOSE</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">Port Adelaide</electorate>
        <portfolios>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Education and Child Development</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Higher Education and Skills</name>
          </portfolio>
        </portfolios>
        <questions>
          <question date="2016-09-28">
            <name>School Absenteeism</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2016-09-28T14:44:25" />
        <page num="7098" />
        <text id="2016092832f5d142a7534d19b0000471">
          <timeStamp time="2016-09-28T14:44:25" />
          <by role="member" id="4622">The Hon. S.E. CLOSE (Port Adelaide—Minister for Education and Child Development, Minister for Higher Education and Skills) (14:44):</by>  I think what I suggested in estimates was that the expiation notices might well form part of a draft piece of legislation but weren't necessarily set in stone because we do want to do consultation on that.</text>
        <text id="2016092832f5d142a7534d19b0000472">This piece of legislation has been in the pipeline for some time, and all of those features have been part of that. What I am interested in is which are going to be the most effective. My view is that we put them all into the draft piece of legislation and hear back, and also go through the prosecutions that are currently under consideration, or are currently live, and see where we land in order to have the best possible legislative framework for attendance, generally, and specifically for prosecutions.</text>
      </talker>
    </subject>
  </proceeding>
</hansard>