<!--The Official Report of Parliamentary Debates (Hansard) of the Legislative Council and the House of Assembly of the Parliament of South Australia are covered by parliamentary privilege. Republication by others is not afforded the same protection and may result in exposure to legal liability if the material is defamatory. You may copy and make use of excerpts of proceedings where (1) you attribute the Parliament as the source, (2) you assume the risk of liability if the manner of your use is defamatory, (3) you do not use the material for the purpose of advertising, satire or ridicule, or to misrepresent members of Parliament, and (4) your use of the extracts is fair, accurate and not misleading. Copyright in the Official Report of Parliamentary Debates is held by the Attorney-General of South Australia.-->
<hansard id="" tocId="" xml:lang="EN-AU" schemaVersion="1.0" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xml="http://www.w3.org/XML/1998/namespace" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2007/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="hansard_1_0.xsd">
  <name>House of Assembly</name>
  <date date="2016-09-28" />
  <sessionName>Fifty-Third Parliament, Second Session (53-2)</sessionName>
  <parliamentNum>53</parliamentNum>
  <sessionNum>2</sessionNum>
  <parliamentName>Parliament of South Australia</parliamentName>
  <house>House of Assembly</house>
  <venue></venue>
  <reviewStage>published</reviewStage>
  <startPage num="7063" />
  <endPage num="7123" />
  <dateModified time="2022-08-06T14:30:00+00:00" />
  <proceeding continued="true">
    <name>Question Time</name>
    <subject>
      <name>Royal Adelaide Hospital</name>
      <text id="2016092829b5b3aaee144b19b0000350">
        <heading>Royal Adelaide Hospital</heading>
      </text>
      <talker role="member" id="4338" kind="question">
        <name>Mr MARSHALL</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">Dunstan</electorate>
        <portfolios>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Leader of the Opposition</name>
          </portfolio>
        </portfolios>
        <questions>
          <question date="2016-09-28">
            <name>Royal Adelaide Hospital</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2016-09-28T14:18:16" />
        <text id="2016092829b5b3aaee144b19b0000351">
          <timeStamp time="2016-09-28T14:18:16" />
          <by role="member" id="4338">Mr MARSHALL (Dunstan—Leader of the Opposition) (14:18):</by>  My question is to the Minister for Health. Can the minister confirm that the current court proceedings focus on the jurisdiction of the independent expert, and not, as he asserted in his ministerial statement on 20 September 2016, on the role of the independent certifier, and does he know the difference between the two roles?</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="627" kind="answer">
        <name>The Hon. J.J. SNELLING</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">Playford</electorate>
        <portfolios>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Health</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for the Arts</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Health Industries</name>
          </portfolio>
        </portfolios>
        <questions>
          <question date="2016-09-28">
            <name>Royal Adelaide Hospital</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2016-09-28T14:18:37" />
        <page num="7091" />
        <text id="2016092829b5b3aaee144b19b0000352">
          <timeStamp time="2016-09-28T14:18:37" />
          <by role="member" id="627">The Hon. J.J. SNELLING (Playford—Minister for Health, Minister for the Arts, Minister for Health Industries) (14:18):</by>  I do. As I said in my ministerial statement—again, the Leader of the Opposition just doesn't listen to what has only been said a matter of five minutes earlier. I quote from my ministerial statement: 'The legal proceedings about the proper role of the independent certifier and the state's contractual rights came before the Supreme Court for directions this morning.' Absolutely, I hold to what I just said five minutes ago, if the Leader of the Opposition bothered to listen or bothered to read.</text>
      </talker>
    </subject>
  </proceeding>
</hansard>