<!--The Official Report of Parliamentary Debates (Hansard) of the Legislative Council and the House of Assembly of the Parliament of South Australia are covered by parliamentary privilege. Republication by others is not afforded the same protection and may result in exposure to legal liability if the material is defamatory. You may copy and make use of excerpts of proceedings where (1) you attribute the Parliament as the source, (2) you assume the risk of liability if the manner of your use is defamatory, (3) you do not use the material for the purpose of advertising, satire or ridicule, or to misrepresent members of Parliament, and (4) your use of the extracts is fair, accurate and not misleading. Copyright in the Official Report of Parliamentary Debates is held by the Attorney-General of South Australia.-->
<hansard id="" tocId="" xml:lang="EN-AU" schemaVersion="1.0" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xml="http://www.w3.org/XML/1998/namespace" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2007/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="hansard_1_0.xsd">
  <name>House of Assembly</name>
  <date date="2016-09-27" />
  <sessionName>Fifty-Third Parliament, Second Session (53-2)</sessionName>
  <parliamentNum>53</parliamentNum>
  <sessionNum>2</sessionNum>
  <parliamentName>Parliament of South Australia</parliamentName>
  <house>House of Assembly</house>
  <venue></venue>
  <reviewStage>published</reviewStage>
  <startPage num="6993" />
  <endPage num="7061" />
  <dateModified time="2022-08-06T14:30:00+00:00" />
  <proceeding continued="true">
    <name>Question Time</name>
    <subject>
      <name>Child Protection</name>
      <text id="20160927ec4b3af5a62346be80000456">
        <heading>Child Protection</heading>
      </text>
      <talker role="member" id="4340" kind="question">
        <name>Ms SANDERSON</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">Adelaide</electorate>
        <questions>
          <question date="2016-09-27">
            <name>Child Protection</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2016-09-27T14:56:05" />
        <text id="20160927ec4b3af5a62346be80000457">
          <timeStamp time="2016-09-27T14:56:05" />
          <by role="member" id="4340">Ms SANDERSON (Adelaide) (14:56):</by>  My question, again, is to the Minister for Education and Child Development. Given that the Chloe Valentine inquest, the Layton review and the Nyland royal commission all recommended that foster parents be involved in family care meetings, will the government now implement this important recommendation and, if not, why not?</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="1810" kind="answer">
        <name>The Hon. J.R. RAU</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">Enfield</electorate>
        <portfolios>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Deputy Premier</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Attorney-General</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Justice Reform</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Planning</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Industrial Relations</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Child Protection Reform</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for the Public Sector</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Consumer and Business Services</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for the City of Adelaide</name>
          </portfolio>
        </portfolios>
        <questions>
          <question date="2016-09-27">
            <name>Child Protection</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2016-09-27T14:56:26" />
        <text id="20160927ec4b3af5a62346be80000458">
          <timeStamp time="2016-09-27T14:56:26" />
          <by role="member" id="1810">The Hon. J.R. RAU (Enfield—Deputy Premier, Attorney-General, Minister for Justice Reform, Minister for Planning, Minister for Industrial Relations, Minister for Child Protection Reform, Minister for the Public Sector, Minister for Consumer and Business Services, Minister for the City of Adelaide) (14:56):</by>  As I foreshadowed in the last answer, and I will try to explain again, there are 260 recommendations in Commissioner Nyland's report. Of those, there have been—</text>
        <text id="20160927ec4b3af5a62346be80000459">
          <event kind="interjection" role="member" id="4340">Ms Sanderson interjecting:</event>
        </text>
      </talker>
      <talker kind="speech" role="office">
        <name>The Speaker</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20160927ec4b3af5a62346be80000460">
          <by role="office">The SPEAKER:</by>  The member for Adelaide is called to order.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="1810" kind="answer" continued="true">
        <name>The Hon. J.R. RAU</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20160927ec4b3af5a62346be80000461">
          <by role="member" id="1810">The Hon. J.R. RAU:</by>  Of those, 38 have been accepted.</text>
        <text id="20160927ec4b3af5a62346be80000462">
          <event kind="interjection" role="member" id="4338">Mr Marshall interjecting:</event>
        </text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="1810" kind="answer" continued="true">
        <name>The Hon. J.R. RAU</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <page num="7027" />
        <text id="20160927ec4b3af5a62346be80000463">
          <by role="member" id="1810">The Hon. J.R. RAU:</by>  Well, my mathematics tell me that means there are some 222 (as a former cricketer would have said) left to be dealt with, and we will work our way through them. But, if the member for Adelaide wants to ask us about any of those 222—</text>
        <text id="20160927ec4b3af5a62346be80000464">
          <event kind="interjection">Members interjecting:</event>
        </text>
      </talker>
      <talker kind="speech" role="office">
        <name>The Speaker</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20160927ec4b3af5a62346be80000465">
          <by role="office">The SPEAKER:</by>  The member for Adelaide is warned, and the leader persistently interjects after he has moved through all his warnings. Deputy Premier.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="1810" kind="answer" continued="true">
        <name>The Hon. J.R. RAU</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20160927ec4b3af5a62346be80000466">
          <by role="member" id="1810">The Hon. J.R. RAU:</by>  We are working through those remaining recommendations, of which this is one, and we will in due course be able to bring to the parliament a draft bill, and at that point in time the member for Adelaide and everybody else who, quite understandably, is interested in this will have an answer to all of those questions. But, at the moment, given that the government has not considered in detail all of the recommendations and how they are going to fit with one another, we cannot piecemeal say, 'Yes, this one; no, not that one—</text>
        <text id="20160927ec4b3af5a62346be80000467">
          <event kind="interjection" role="member" id="4340">Ms Sanderson interjecting:</event>
        </text>
      </talker>
      <talker kind="speech" role="office">
        <name>The Speaker</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20160927ec4b3af5a62346be80000468">
          <by role="office">The SPEAKER:</by>  The member for Adelaide is warned for the second and the final time.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="1810" kind="answer" continued="true">
        <name>The Hon. J.R. RAU</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20160927ec4b3af5a62346be80000469">
          <by role="member" id="1810">The Hon. J.R. RAU:</by>  We are not going to do this in some ad hoc fashion. Indeed, the commissioner was at pains to say to us in her report, 'Don't rush this. Don't you get ahead of yourselves and do something which isn't done properly. You do it properly.' That's what we intend to do: we intend to do it properly.</text>
      </talker>
    </subject>
  </proceeding>
</hansard>