<!--The Official Report of Parliamentary Debates (Hansard) of the Legislative Council and the House of Assembly of the Parliament of South Australia are covered by parliamentary privilege. Republication by others is not afforded the same protection and may result in exposure to legal liability if the material is defamatory. You may copy and make use of excerpts of proceedings where (1) you attribute the Parliament as the source, (2) you assume the risk of liability if the manner of your use is defamatory, (3) you do not use the material for the purpose of advertising, satire or ridicule, or to misrepresent members of Parliament, and (4) your use of the extracts is fair, accurate and not misleading. Copyright in the Official Report of Parliamentary Debates is held by the Attorney-General of South Australia.-->
<hansard id="" tocId="" xml:lang="EN-AU" schemaVersion="1.0" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xml="http://www.w3.org/XML/1998/namespace" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2007/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="hansard_1_0.xsd">
  <name>House of Assembly</name>
  <date date="2016-09-27" />
  <sessionName>Fifty-Third Parliament, Second Session (53-2)</sessionName>
  <parliamentNum>53</parliamentNum>
  <sessionNum>2</sessionNum>
  <parliamentName>Parliament of South Australia</parliamentName>
  <house>House of Assembly</house>
  <venue></venue>
  <reviewStage>published</reviewStage>
  <startPage num="6993" />
  <endPage num="7061" />
  <dateModified time="2022-08-06T14:30:00+00:00" />
  <proceeding continued="true">
    <name>Question Time</name>
    <subject>
      <name>Child Protection Department</name>
      <text id="201609271318e7da39be4aa690000446">
        <heading>Child Protection Department</heading>
      </text>
      <talker role="member" id="4340" kind="question">
        <name>Ms SANDERSON</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">Adelaide</electorate>
        <questions>
          <question date="2016-09-27">
            <name>Child Protection Department</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2016-09-27T14:53:55" />
        <text id="201609271318e7da39be4aa690000447">
          <timeStamp time="2016-09-27T14:53:55" />
          <by role="member" id="4340">Ms SANDERSON (Adelaide) (14:53):</by>  My question is to the Minister for Education and Child Development. Given the significant weight placed on the importance of drug and alcohol orders by the Chloe Valentine inquest, will the government now implement Justice Nyland's recommendation that the child protection agency be given the power to issue a written directive to parents or guardians to require them to submit to drug or alcohol assessment?</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="1810" kind="answer">
        <name>The Hon. J.R. RAU</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">Enfield</electorate>
        <portfolios>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Deputy Premier</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Attorney-General</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Justice Reform</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Planning</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Industrial Relations</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Child Protection Reform</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for the Public Sector</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Consumer and Business Services</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for the City of Adelaide</name>
          </portfolio>
        </portfolios>
        <questions>
          <question date="2016-09-27">
            <name>Child Protection Department</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2016-09-27T14:54:25" />
        <text id="201609271318e7da39be4aa690000448">
          <timeStamp time="2016-09-27T14:54:25" />
          <by role="member" id="1810">The Hon. J.R. RAU (Enfield—Deputy Premier, Attorney-General, Minister for Justice Reform, Minister for Planning, Minister for Industrial Relations, Minister for Child Protection Reform, Minister for the Public Sector, Minister for Consumer and Business Services, Minister for the City of Adelaide) (14:54):</by>  This is one of the recommendations from the commissioner that we are looking at, and in due course we will be making a determination about whether the recommendation is to be accepted and we will be—</text>
        <text id="201609271318e7da39be4aa690000449">
          <event kind="interjection" role="member" id="4338">Mr Marshall interjecting:</event>
        </text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="1810" kind="answer" continued="true">
        <name>The Hon. J.R. RAU</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="201609271318e7da39be4aa690000450">
          <by role="member" id="1810">The Hon. J.R. RAU:</by>  As I think I have foreshadowed, it's our intention to bring forward a completely new child protection legislative framework and—</text>
        <text id="201609271318e7da39be4aa690000451">
          <event kind="interjection" role="member" id="4338">Mr Marshall interjecting:</event>
        </text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="1810" kind="answer" continued="true">
        <name>The Hon. J.R. RAU</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="201609271318e7da39be4aa690000452">
          <by role="member" id="1810">The Hon. J.R. RAU:</by>  Yes, well. The new framework will address all of these particular issues which were thrown up in Commissioner Nyland's report. It is entirely a matter for the member for Adelaide and others but, if they wish to ask the government questions about each and every one of the recommendations, however many times they ask those questions the answer today will be the same, which is that 38 of them have been accepted and the rest of them we are looking at. I don't mind—</text>
        <text id="201609271318e7da39be4aa690000453">
          <event kind="interjection" role="member" id="4338">Mr Marshall interjecting:</event>
        </text>
      </talker>
      <talker kind="speech" role="office">
        <name>The Speaker</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="201609271318e7da39be4aa690000454">
          <by role="office">The SPEAKER:</by>  It is not a debate. The member for Adelaide has asked a question. The Deputy Premier is answering it. The leader is warned for the second and final time.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="1810" kind="answer" continued="true">
        <name>The Hon. J.R. RAU</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="201609271318e7da39be4aa690000455">
          <by role="member" id="1810">The Hon. J.R. RAU:</by>  This is one of the matters that we will consider in the context of the legislation that we hope to be bringing to the parliament in the not too distant future, and we will see exactly how that fits together when we have that draft.</text>
      </talker>
    </subject>
  </proceeding>
</hansard>