<!--The Official Report of Parliamentary Debates (Hansard) of the Legislative Council and the House of Assembly of the Parliament of South Australia are covered by parliamentary privilege. Republication by others is not afforded the same protection and may result in exposure to legal liability if the material is defamatory. You may copy and make use of excerpts of proceedings where (1) you attribute the Parliament as the source, (2) you assume the risk of liability if the manner of your use is defamatory, (3) you do not use the material for the purpose of advertising, satire or ridicule, or to misrepresent members of Parliament, and (4) your use of the extracts is fair, accurate and not misleading. Copyright in the Official Report of Parliamentary Debates is held by the Attorney-General of South Australia.-->
<hansard id="" tocId="" xml:lang="EN-AU" schemaVersion="1.0" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xml="http://www.w3.org/XML/1998/namespace" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2007/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="hansard_1_0.xsd">
  <name>House of Assembly</name>
  <date date="2016-09-27" />
  <sessionName>Fifty-Third Parliament, Second Session (53-2)</sessionName>
  <parliamentNum>53</parliamentNum>
  <sessionNum>2</sessionNum>
  <parliamentName>Parliament of South Australia</parliamentName>
  <house>House of Assembly</house>
  <venue></venue>
  <reviewStage>published</reviewStage>
  <startPage num="6993" />
  <endPage num="7061" />
  <dateModified time="2022-08-06T14:30:00+00:00" />
  <proceeding continued="true">
    <name>Question Time</name>
    <subject>
      <name>Child Protection</name>
      <text id="201609276c07e5ad88124e5f80000378">
        <heading>Child Protection</heading>
      </text>
      <talker role="member" id="4338" kind="question">
        <name>Mr MARSHALL</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">Dunstan</electorate>
        <portfolios>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Leader of the Opposition</name>
          </portfolio>
        </portfolios>
        <questions>
          <question date="2016-09-27">
            <name>Child Protection</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2016-09-27T14:34:00" />
        <text id="201609276c07e5ad88124e5f80000379">
          <timeStamp time="2016-09-27T14:34:00" />
          <by role="member" id="4338">Mr MARSHALL (Dunstan—Leader of the Opposition) (14:34):</by>  My question is to the Premier. Has the investigation of the three employees identified of being under investigation by the Premier on 8 August this year been finalised and, if so, what was the outcome?</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="1810" kind="answer">
        <name>The Hon. J.R. RAU</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">Enfield</electorate>
        <portfolios>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Deputy Premier</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Attorney-General</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Justice Reform</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Planning</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Industrial Relations</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Child Protection Reform</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for the Public Sector</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Consumer and Business Services</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for the City of Adelaide</name>
          </portfolio>
        </portfolios>
        <questions>
          <question date="2016-09-27">
            <name>Child Protection</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2016-09-27T14:34:15" />
        <text id="201609276c07e5ad88124e5f80000380">
          <timeStamp time="2016-09-27T14:34:15" />
          <by role="member" id="1810">The Hon. J.R. RAU (Enfield—Deputy Premier, Attorney-General, Minister for Justice Reform, Minister for Planning, Minister for Industrial Relations, Minister for Child Protection Reform, Minister for the Public Sector, Minister for Consumer and Business Services, Minister for the City of Adelaide) (14:34):</by>  I am not aware of those having been finalised as yet. I will seek to find out some more information about that, but I think it is important for members to understand that, if a person is the subject of a criticism by a royal commissioner or even a journalist, it is not automatic that that person is summarily terminated from their employment.</text>
        <text id="201609276c07e5ad88124e5f80000381">There is a process to which the government is obliged to adhere. That process involves due process, it involves procedural fairness, it involves an opportunity for any particular allegations which might be put against the individual to be put to that person and that person to be given an opportunity to respond if they are able to respond. Those things have to be done properly because if they are not, the government is not acting as a model employer, and the government is not setting the example that the government should set. Those things often take some time. However, I will inquire as to how far progressed Mr Persse is with that process and I will get back to the Leader of the Opposition.</text>
      </talker>
    </subject>
  </proceeding>
</hansard>