<!--The Official Report of Parliamentary Debates (Hansard) of the Legislative Council and the House of Assembly of the Parliament of South Australia are covered by parliamentary privilege. Republication by others is not afforded the same protection and may result in exposure to legal liability if the material is defamatory. You may copy and make use of excerpts of proceedings where (1) you attribute the Parliament as the source, (2) you assume the risk of liability if the manner of your use is defamatory, (3) you do not use the material for the purpose of advertising, satire or ridicule, or to misrepresent members of Parliament, and (4) your use of the extracts is fair, accurate and not misleading. Copyright in the Official Report of Parliamentary Debates is held by the Attorney-General of South Australia.-->
<hansard id="" tocId="" xml:lang="EN-AU" schemaVersion="1.0" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xml="http://www.w3.org/XML/1998/namespace" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2007/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="hansard_1_0.xsd">
  <name>House of Assembly</name>
  <date date="2016-09-27" />
  <sessionName>Fifty-Third Parliament, Second Session (53-2)</sessionName>
  <parliamentNum>53</parliamentNum>
  <sessionNum>2</sessionNum>
  <parliamentName>Parliament of South Australia</parliamentName>
  <house>House of Assembly</house>
  <venue></venue>
  <reviewStage>published</reviewStage>
  <startPage num="6993" />
  <endPage num="7061" />
  <dateModified time="2022-08-06T14:30:00+00:00" />
  <proceeding continued="true">
    <name>Question Time</name>
    <subject>
      <name>Child Protection</name>
      <text id="20160927a9cd87353a2a426280000371">
        <heading>Child Protection</heading>
      </text>
      <talker role="member" id="4338" kind="question">
        <name>Mr MARSHALL</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">Dunstan</electorate>
        <portfolios>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Leader of the Opposition</name>
          </portfolio>
        </portfolios>
        <questions>
          <question date="2016-09-27">
            <name>Child Protection</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2016-09-27T14:32:23" />
        <text id="20160927a9cd87353a2a426280000372">
          <timeStamp time="2016-09-27T14:32:23" />
          <by role="member" id="4338">Mr MARSHALL (Dunstan—Leader of the Opposition) (14:32):</by>  My question is to the Premier. Can the Premier inform the house who is conducting this investigation and can he confirm to the house that all of those people identified in the Nyland royal commission report involved in the case studies are subject to this investigation?</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="1810" kind="answer">
        <name>The Hon. J.R. RAU</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">Enfield</electorate>
        <portfolios>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Deputy Premier</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Attorney-General</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Justice Reform</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Planning</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Industrial Relations</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Child Protection Reform</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for the Public Sector</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Consumer and Business Services</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for the City of Adelaide</name>
          </portfolio>
        </portfolios>
        <questions>
          <question date="2016-09-27">
            <name>Child Protection</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2016-09-27T14:32:48" />
        <text id="20160927a9cd87353a2a426280000373">
          <timeStamp time="2016-09-27T14:32:48" />
          <by role="member" id="1810">The Hon. J.R. RAU (Enfield—Deputy Premier, Attorney-General, Minister for Justice Reform, Minister for Planning, Minister for Industrial Relations, Minister for Child Protection Reform, Minister for the Public Sector, Minister for Consumer and Business Services, Minister for the City of Adelaide) (14:32):</by>  I think I have just answered that question.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="4338" kind="interjection">
        <name>Mr Marshall</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20160927a9cd87353a2a426280000374">
          <by role="member" id="4338">Mr Marshall:</by>  You didn't. The question was: were all employees involved in the royal commission report subject to investigation?</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="1810" kind="answer" continued="true">
        <name>The Hon. J.R. RAU</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <page num="7021" />
        <text id="20160927a9cd87353a2a426280000375">
          <by role="member" id="1810">The Hon. J.R. RAU:</by>  I think I have explained and I will explain again. Mr Persse, as chief executive, immediately undertook appropriate steps in respect of particular individuals who were singled out. In fact, if my memory serves me correctly, at least one individual was suspended immediately—</text>
        <text id="20160927a9cd87353a2a426280000376">
          <event kind="interjection">An honourable member interjecting:</event>
        </text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="1810" kind="answer" continued="true">
        <name>The Hon. J.R. RAU</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20160927a9cd87353a2a426280000377">
          <by role="member" id="1810">The Hon. J.R. RAU:</by>  —three—three individuals were suspended immediately and the appropriate process due to any public servant who is being accused of poor performance or misconduct has been or is being undertaken in respect of those individuals. It would be my expectation that, if there were any further individuals who fall into that category, they would be given due process, as they are entitled to expect as employees of the state, and the investigations would be conducted in accordance with appropriate human resource management policies.</text>
      </talker>
    </subject>
  </proceeding>
</hansard>