<!--The Official Report of Parliamentary Debates (Hansard) of the Legislative Council and the House of Assembly of the Parliament of South Australia are covered by parliamentary privilege. Republication by others is not afforded the same protection and may result in exposure to legal liability if the material is defamatory. You may copy and make use of excerpts of proceedings where (1) you attribute the Parliament as the source, (2) you assume the risk of liability if the manner of your use is defamatory, (3) you do not use the material for the purpose of advertising, satire or ridicule, or to misrepresent members of Parliament, and (4) your use of the extracts is fair, accurate and not misleading. Copyright in the Official Report of Parliamentary Debates is held by the Attorney-General of South Australia.-->
<hansard id="" tocId="" xml:lang="EN-AU" schemaVersion="1.0" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xml="http://www.w3.org/XML/1998/namespace" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2007/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="hansard_1_0.xsd">
  <name>House of Assembly</name>
  <date date="2016-09-27" />
  <sessionName>Fifty-Third Parliament, Second Session (53-2)</sessionName>
  <parliamentNum>53</parliamentNum>
  <sessionNum>2</sessionNum>
  <parliamentName>Parliament of South Australia</parliamentName>
  <house>House of Assembly</house>
  <venue></venue>
  <reviewStage>published</reviewStage>
  <startPage num="6993" />
  <endPage num="7061" />
  <dateModified time="2022-08-06T14:30:00+00:00" />
  <proceeding>
    <name>Question Time</name>
    <text id="20160927a9a35bf23ae24576a0000284">
      <heading>Question Time</heading>
    </text>
    <subject>
      <name>Child Protection Department</name>
      <text id="20160927a9a35bf23ae24576a0000285">
        <heading>Child Protection Department</heading>
      </text>
      <talker role="member" id="4338" kind="question">
        <name>Mr MARSHALL</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">Dunstan</electorate>
        <portfolios>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Leader of the Opposition</name>
          </portfolio>
        </portfolios>
        <questions>
          <question date="2016-09-27">
            <name>Child Protection Department</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2016-09-27T14:14:46" />
        <text id="20160927a9a35bf23ae24576a0000286">
          <timeStamp time="2016-09-27T14:14:46" />
          <by role="member" id="4338">Mr MARSHALL (Dunstan—Leader of the Opposition) (14:14):</by>  My question is to the Premier. Why did the Premier commit to establishing a new child protection department prior to the handing down of the Nyland royal commission report, when it was revealed at a briefing today that cabinet hasn't even signed off on what the new department's responsibilities will include?</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="1812" kind="answer">
        <name>The Hon. J.W. WEATHERILL</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">Cheltenham</electorate>
        <portfolios>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Premier</name>
          </portfolio>
        </portfolios>
        <questions>
          <question date="2016-09-27">
            <name>Child Protection Department</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2016-09-27T14:15:12" />
        <text id="20160927a9a35bf23ae24576a0000287">
          <timeStamp time="2016-09-27T14:15:12" />
          <by role="member" id="1812">The Hon. J.W. WEATHERILL (Cheltenham—Premier) (14:15):</by>  For the reasons we mentioned at the time that we made the announcement—that was, to ensure that the work that could take place in the preparation of the new agency could be well advanced—</text>
        <text id="20160927a9a35bf23ae24576a0000288">
          <event kind="interjection" role="member" id="4847">Mr Knoll interjecting:</event>
        </text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="1812" kind="answer" continued="true">
        <name>The Hon. J.W. WEATHERILL</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20160927a9a35bf23ae24576a0000289">
          <by role="member" id="1812">The Hon. J.W. WEATHERILL:</by>  —by the time that we had the broader report that was handed down. The ambition was to make sure that we were able to take the initial planning for the new agency in a way that meant that it had a chance of being up and running so that we could get cracking with the implementation of the report.</text>
        <text id="20160927a9a35bf23ae24576a0000290">
          <event kind="interjection" role="member" id="1804">Ms Chapman interjecting:</event>
        </text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="1812" kind="answer" continued="true">
        <name>The Hon. J.W. WEATHERILL</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20160927a9a35bf23ae24576a0000291">
          <by role="member" id="1812">The Hon. J.W. WEATHERILL:</by>  We also wanted to get on with the business of recruiting a new chief executive, so that chief executive could have some input into the response to the royal commission report and actually lead the new agency. There's not much point in having a new agency with a different leadership only to change that leadership halfway through.</text>
        <text id="20160927a9a35bf23ae24576a0000292">
          <event kind="interjection">Members interjecting:</event>
        </text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="1812" kind="answer" continued="true">
        <name>The Hon. J.W. WEATHERILL</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20160927a9a35bf23ae24576a0000293">
          <by role="member" id="1812">The Hon. J.W. WEATHERILL:</by>  This is all pretty sensible stuff—basically, getting a report, getting a recommendation. In fact, I met with the royal commissioner and invited her to make an interim recommendation so that we could have the benefit of that recommendation so that we could act on it in advance of the royal commission's findings coming down. So, this is a fairly natural response to the orderly implementation of recommendations. I don't understand why the opposition is so confused about it.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="4338">
        <name>Mr MARSHALL</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20160927a9a35bf23ae24576a0000294">
          <by role="member" id="4338">Mr MARSHALL:</by>  Supplementary, sir.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker kind="speech" role="office">
        <name>The Speaker</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20160927a9a35bf23ae24576a0000295">
          <by role="office">The SPEAKER:</by>  Before we go to a supplementary, the member for Schubert has used up all his warnings and continues to interject. I call to order the members for Kavel, Morialta and Morphett. I warn for the first time the deputy leader, the member for Morialta and the member for Kavel, and I warn for the second and final time the member for Morialta. Leader.</text>
      </talker>
    </subject>
  </proceeding>
</hansard>