<!--The Official Report of Parliamentary Debates (Hansard) of the Legislative Council and the House of Assembly of the Parliament of South Australia are covered by parliamentary privilege. Republication by others is not afforded the same protection and may result in exposure to legal liability if the material is defamatory. You may copy and make use of excerpts of proceedings where (1) you attribute the Parliament as the source, (2) you assume the risk of liability if the manner of your use is defamatory, (3) you do not use the material for the purpose of advertising, satire or ridicule, or to misrepresent members of Parliament, and (4) your use of the extracts is fair, accurate and not misleading. Copyright in the Official Report of Parliamentary Debates is held by the Attorney-General of South Australia.-->
<hansard id="" tocId="" xml:lang="EN-AU" schemaVersion="1.0" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xml="http://www.w3.org/XML/1998/namespace" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2007/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="hansard_1_0.xsd">
  <name>House of Assembly</name>
  <date date="2016-09-22" />
  <sessionName>Fifty-Third Parliament, Second Session (53-2)</sessionName>
  <parliamentNum>53</parliamentNum>
  <sessionNum>2</sessionNum>
  <parliamentName>Parliament of South Australia</parliamentName>
  <house>House of Assembly</house>
  <venue></venue>
  <reviewStage>published</reviewStage>
  <startPage num="6913" />
  <endPage num="6991" />
  <dateModified time="2022-08-06T14:30:00+00:00" />
  <proceeding continued="true">
    <name>Question Time</name>
    <subject>
      <name>Pelican Point Power Station</name>
      <text id="20160922ee55c6d668404c4c90000698">
        <heading>Pelican Point Power Station</heading>
      </text>
      <talker role="member" id="546" kind="question">
        <name>Mr WILLIAMS</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">MacKillop</electorate>
        <questions>
          <question date="2016-09-22">
            <name>Pelican Point Power Station</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2016-09-22T14:46:42" />
        <text id="20160922ee55c6d668404c4c90000699">
          <timeStamp time="2016-09-22T14:46:42" />
          <by role="member" id="546">Mr WILLIAMS (MacKillop) (14:46):</by>  The Minister for Energy's earlier answer said that the government wishes to get more gas-fired generation capacity in South Australia. Can he explain to the house: is not Pelican Point Power Station gas-fired and why has it been mothballed?</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="633" kind="answer">
        <name>The Hon. A. KOUTSANTONIS</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">West Torrens</electorate>
        <portfolios>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Finance</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for State Development</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Mineral Resources and Energy</name>
          </portfolio>
        </portfolios>
        <questions>
          <question date="2016-09-22">
            <name>Pelican Point Power Station</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2016-09-22T14:47:00" />
        <text id="20160922ee55c6d668404c4c90000700">
          <timeStamp time="2016-09-22T14:47:00" />
          <by role="member" id="633">The Hon. A. KOUTSANTONIS (West Torrens—Treasurer, Minister for Finance, Minister for State Development, Minister for Mineral Resources and Energy) (14:47):</by>  I will ask the private owners of that power-fired generator why they have mothballed it. What we are attempting to do through our procurement is we are going to underwrite a long-term, 10-year contract where we will go out to the market to try to incentivise more generation into South Australia. Our plan has been welcomed by the energy industry, and I note the absence of an alternative plan because the Leader of the Opposition has no policies—not one.</text>
      </talker>
    </subject>
  </proceeding>
</hansard>