<!--The Official Report of Parliamentary Debates (Hansard) of the Legislative Council and the House of Assembly of the Parliament of South Australia are covered by parliamentary privilege. Republication by others is not afforded the same protection and may result in exposure to legal liability if the material is defamatory. You may copy and make use of excerpts of proceedings where (1) you attribute the Parliament as the source, (2) you assume the risk of liability if the manner of your use is defamatory, (3) you do not use the material for the purpose of advertising, satire or ridicule, or to misrepresent members of Parliament, and (4) your use of the extracts is fair, accurate and not misleading. Copyright in the Official Report of Parliamentary Debates is held by the Attorney-General of South Australia.-->
<hansard id="" tocId="" xml:lang="EN-AU" schemaVersion="1.0" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xml="http://www.w3.org/XML/1998/namespace" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2007/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="hansard_1_0.xsd">
  <name>House of Assembly</name>
  <date date="2016-09-20" />
  <sessionName>Fifty-Third Parliament, Second Session (53-2)</sessionName>
  <parliamentNum>53</parliamentNum>
  <sessionNum>2</sessionNum>
  <parliamentName>Parliament of South Australia</parliamentName>
  <house>House of Assembly</house>
  <venue></venue>
  <reviewStage>published</reviewStage>
  <startPage num="6725" />
  <endPage num="6825" />
  <dateModified time="2022-08-06T14:30:00+00:00" />
  <proceeding continued="true">
    <name>Question Time</name>
    <subject>
      <name>Child Protection</name>
      <text id="201609207f56846af4464789a0001105">
        <heading>Child Protection</heading>
      </text>
      <talker role="member" id="1804" kind="question">
        <name>Ms CHAPMAN</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">Bragg</electorate>
        <portfolios>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Deputy Leader of the Opposition</name>
          </portfolio>
        </portfolios>
        <questions>
          <question date="2016-09-20">
            <name>Child Protection</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2016-09-20T14:52:03" />
        <text id="201609207f56846af4464789a0001106">
          <timeStamp time="2016-09-20T14:52:03" />
          <by role="member" id="1804">Ms CHAPMAN (Bragg—Deputy Leader of the Opposition) (14:52):</by>  My question is to the Minister for Education and Child Development. Can the minister confirm whether the royal commission's suggestion that all staff answering CARL lines and the calls in particular have at least three years' field experience has been adopted and, if not, why not?</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="4622" kind="answer">
        <name>The Hon. S.E. CLOSE</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">Port Adelaide</electorate>
        <portfolios>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Education and Child Development</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Higher Education and Skills</name>
          </portfolio>
        </portfolios>
        <questions>
          <question date="2016-09-20">
            <name>Child Protection</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2016-09-20T14:52:21" />
        <page num="6776" />
        <text id="201609207f56846af4464789a0001107">
          <timeStamp time="2016-09-20T14:52:21" />
          <by role="member" id="4622">The Hon. S.E. CLOSE (Port Adelaide—Minister for Education and Child Development, Minister for Higher Education and Skills) (14:52):</by>  We are still working through that recommendation. We did immediately accept the recommendation, somewhat to my chagrin, that we not have non-social work qualified people answering the calls. As members will be well aware, I was pretty keen on doing a trial of non-social workers answering calls in order to see if we could get the wait time down. However, there was an explicit recommendation that we not proceed with that and so we accepted that immediately. Otherwise, we have staff management and disposition issues of course. We can't just pull people off work that they are doing that is important but we are working through the staffing profile at present.</text>
      </talker>
    </subject>
  </proceeding>
</hansard>