<!--The Official Report of Parliamentary Debates (Hansard) of the Legislative Council and the House of Assembly of the Parliament of South Australia are covered by parliamentary privilege. Republication by others is not afforded the same protection and may result in exposure to legal liability if the material is defamatory. You may copy and make use of excerpts of proceedings where (1) you attribute the Parliament as the source, (2) you assume the risk of liability if the manner of your use is defamatory, (3) you do not use the material for the purpose of advertising, satire or ridicule, or to misrepresent members of Parliament, and (4) your use of the extracts is fair, accurate and not misleading. Copyright in the Official Report of Parliamentary Debates is held by the Attorney-General of South Australia.-->
<hansard id="" tocId="" xml:lang="EN-AU" schemaVersion="1.0" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xml="http://www.w3.org/XML/1998/namespace" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2007/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="hansard_1_0.xsd">
  <name>House of Assembly</name>
  <date date="2016-09-20" />
  <sessionName>Fifty-Third Parliament, Second Session (53-2)</sessionName>
  <parliamentNum>53</parliamentNum>
  <sessionNum>2</sessionNum>
  <parliamentName>Parliament of South Australia</parliamentName>
  <house>House of Assembly</house>
  <venue></venue>
  <reviewStage>published</reviewStage>
  <startPage num="6725" />
  <endPage num="6825" />
  <dateModified time="2022-08-06T14:30:00+00:00" />
  <proceeding>
    <name>Question Time</name>
    <text id="201609206816b981c3c0487790000936">
      <heading>Question Time</heading>
    </text>
    <subject>
      <name>Child Protection Department</name>
      <text id="201609206816b981c3c0487790000937">
        <heading>Child Protection Department</heading>
      </text>
      <talker role="member" id="4338" kind="question">
        <name>Mr MARSHALL</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">Dunstan</electorate>
        <portfolios>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Leader of the Opposition</name>
          </portfolio>
        </portfolios>
        <questions>
          <question date="2016-09-20">
            <name>Child Protection Department</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2016-09-20T14:20:36" />
        <text id="201609206816b981c3c0487790000938">
          <timeStamp time="2016-09-20T14:20:36" />
          <by role="member" id="4338">Mr MARSHALL (Dunstan—Leader of the Opposition) (14:20):</by>  My question is to the Minister for Child Protection Reform. Why has the department for child protection not yet been split from the education department as promised on 21 June following the recommendation from the interim royal commission report?</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="1810" kind="answer">
        <name>The Hon. J.R. RAU</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">Enfield</electorate>
        <portfolios>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Deputy Premier</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Attorney-General</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Justice Reform</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Planning</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Industrial Relations</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Child Protection Reform</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for the Public Sector</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Consumer and Business Services</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for the City of Adelaide</name>
          </portfolio>
        </portfolios>
        <questions>
          <question date="2016-09-20">
            <name>Child Protection Department</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2016-09-20T14:20:55" />
        <text id="201609206816b981c3c0487790000939">
          <timeStamp time="2016-09-20T14:20:55" />
          <by role="member" id="1810">The Hon. J.R. RAU (Enfield—Deputy Premier, Attorney-General, Minister for Justice Reform, Minister for Planning, Minister for Industrial Relations, Minister for Child Protection Reform, Minister for the Public Sector, Minister for Consumer and Business Services, Minister for the City of Adelaide) (14:20):</by>  I thank the leader for his question. The splitting of the child protection function from its existing home, which is with education, is something which requires a machinery of government change of some reasonable complexity.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="3124" kind="interjection">
        <name>Mr Pisoni</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="201609206816b981c3c0487790000940">
          <by role="member" id="3124">Mr Pisoni:</by>  Whose idea was it to put it together?</text>
      </talker>
      <talker kind="speech" role="office">
        <name>The Speaker</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="201609206816b981c3c0487790000941">
          <by role="office">The SPEAKER:</by>  The member for Unley is called to order.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="1810" kind="answer" continued="true">
        <name>The Hon. J.R. RAU</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="201609206816b981c3c0487790000942">
          <by role="member" id="1810">The Hon. J.R. RAU:</by>  There have been people working on the machinery of government changes that will be necessary. That has been occurring since that time. There has also been a fairly exhaustive search for a suitable candidate to take on the role of the chief executive of that new agency. My understanding is that she will start work—</text>
        <text id="201609206816b981c3c0487790000943">
          <event kind="interjection" role="member" id="4343">Mr Gardner interjecting:</event>
        </text>
      </talker>
      <talker kind="speech" role="office">
        <name>The Speaker</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="201609206816b981c3c0487790000944">
          <by role="office">The SPEAKER:</by>  The member for Morialta is warned for the second and final time.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="1810" kind="answer" continued="true">
        <name>The Hon. J.R. RAU</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="201609206816b981c3c0487790000945">
          <by role="member" id="1810">The Hon. J.R. RAU:</by>  My understanding is that she will commence duties on 31 October, and therefore, out of an abundance of caution, we have said that we will be working to have it ready to go on 1 November at the latest. If we can do something in a shorter time, we will, but that would necessarily mean we would have an interval where the new department was sitting in a position where it had an acting chief executive for a period of time from its inception.</text>
        <text id="201609206816b981c3c0487790000946">
          <event kind="interjection" role="member" id="4847">Mr Knoll interjecting:</event>
        </text>
      </talker>
      <talker kind="speech" role="office">
        <name>The Speaker</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="201609206816b981c3c0487790000947">
          <by role="office">The SPEAKER:</by>  The member for Schubert is warned for the second and final time.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="1810" kind="answer" continued="true">
        <name>The Hon. J.R. RAU</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="201609206816b981c3c0487790000948">
          <by role="member" id="1810">The Hon. J.R. RAU:</by>  It would seem to me that having a department start with an acting chief executive known by everybody to be about to be replaced may not be the best way to start. That said, if we can achieve the necessary changes in terms of machinery of government, then they will occur when they can.</text>
        <text id="201609206816b981c3c0487790000949">
          <event kind="interjection" role="member" id="3124">Mr Pisoni interjecting:</event>
        </text>
      </talker>
      <talker kind="speech" role="office">
        <name>The Speaker</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="201609206816b981c3c0487790000950">
          <by role="office">The SPEAKER:</by>  The member for Unley is warned.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="1810" kind="answer" continued="true">
        <name>The Hon. J.R. RAU</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="201609206816b981c3c0487790000951">
          <by role="member" id="1810">The Hon. J.R. RAU:</by>  We have said that we will endeavour to be in a position at a minimum where when the new chief executive comes on board, she will have a new agency to take charge of.</text>
      </talker>
    </subject>
  </proceeding>
</hansard>