<!--The Official Report of Parliamentary Debates (Hansard) of the Legislative Council and the House of Assembly of the Parliament of South Australia are covered by parliamentary privilege. Republication by others is not afforded the same protection and may result in exposure to legal liability if the material is defamatory. You may copy and make use of excerpts of proceedings where (1) you attribute the Parliament as the source, (2) you assume the risk of liability if the manner of your use is defamatory, (3) you do not use the material for the purpose of advertising, satire or ridicule, or to misrepresent members of Parliament, and (4) your use of the extracts is fair, accurate and not misleading. Copyright in the Official Report of Parliamentary Debates is held by the Attorney-General of South Australia.-->
<hansard id="" tocId="" xml:lang="EN-AU" schemaVersion="1.0" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xml="http://www.w3.org/XML/1998/namespace" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2007/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="hansard_1_0.xsd">
  <name>House of Assembly</name>
  <date date="2016-08-04" />
  <sessionName>Fifty-Third Parliament, Second Session (53-2)</sessionName>
  <parliamentNum>53</parliamentNum>
  <sessionNum>2</sessionNum>
  <parliamentName>Parliament of South Australia</parliamentName>
  <house>House of Assembly</house>
  <venue></venue>
  <reviewStage>published</reviewStage>
  <startPage num="6619" />
  <endPage num="6724" />
  <dateModified time="2022-08-06T14:30:00+00:00" />
  <proceeding continued="true">
    <name>Question Time</name>
    <subject>
      <name>Ambulance Services</name>
      <text id="201608049aa7ccaf67a4403d80001492">
        <heading>Ambulance Services</heading>
      </text>
      <talker role="member" id="1804" kind="question">
        <name>Ms CHAPMAN</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">Bragg</electorate>
        <portfolios>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Deputy Leader of the Opposition</name>
          </portfolio>
        </portfolios>
        <questions>
          <question date="2016-08-04">
            <name>Ambulance Services</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2016-08-04T14:56:01" />
        <text id="201608049aa7ccaf67a4403d80001493">
          <timeStamp time="2016-08-04T14:56:01" />
          <by role="member" id="1804">Ms CHAPMAN (Bragg—Deputy Leader of the Opposition) (14:56):</by>  My question is to the Minister for Health. If South Australian Ambulance staff have all the support they need, as just stated by the minister, why then did SA Ambulance staff take a patient to the Modbury Hospital before having to then transfer that patient to the Lyell McEwin Hospital?</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="627" kind="answer">
        <name>The Hon. J.J. SNELLING</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">Playford</electorate>
        <portfolios>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Health</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for the Arts</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Health Industries</name>
          </portfolio>
        </portfolios>
        <questions>
          <question date="2016-08-04">
            <name>Ambulance Services</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2016-08-04T14:56:22" />
        <text id="201608049aa7ccaf67a4403d80001494">
          <timeStamp time="2016-08-04T14:56:22" />
          <by role="member" id="627">The Hon. J.J. SNELLING (Playford—Minister for Health, Minister for the Arts, Minister for Health Industries) (14:56):</by>  Because they would have done so based on the clinical indications of the patient. I don't think there is any suggestion from anyone, and I would be very surprised if the Deputy Leader of the Opposition is making the suggestion, that the paramedics handling a particular patient have done so ineptly. I would be pretty surprised and certainly reject that.</text>
        <text id="201608049aa7ccaf67a4403d80001495">I am sure the paramedics would have done so in accordance with the clinical indications that they had. As I have said previously, it is not unusual, if an emergency department is particularly busy, for an ambulance to go to a close-by emergency department that is less busy if it is clinically appropriate to do so. I have not heard of any suggestion in any patient where that has not been the case.</text>
      </talker>
    </subject>
  </proceeding>
</hansard>