<!--The Official Report of Parliamentary Debates (Hansard) of the Legislative Council and the House of Assembly of the Parliament of South Australia are covered by parliamentary privilege. Republication by others is not afforded the same protection and may result in exposure to legal liability if the material is defamatory. You may copy and make use of excerpts of proceedings where (1) you attribute the Parliament as the source, (2) you assume the risk of liability if the manner of your use is defamatory, (3) you do not use the material for the purpose of advertising, satire or ridicule, or to misrepresent members of Parliament, and (4) your use of the extracts is fair, accurate and not misleading. Copyright in the Official Report of Parliamentary Debates is held by the Attorney-General of South Australia.-->
<hansard id="" tocId="" xml:lang="EN-AU" schemaVersion="1.0" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xml="http://www.w3.org/XML/1998/namespace" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2007/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="hansard_1_0.xsd">
  <name>House of Assembly</name>
  <date date="2016-08-04" />
  <sessionName>Fifty-Third Parliament, Second Session (53-2)</sessionName>
  <parliamentNum>53</parliamentNum>
  <sessionNum>2</sessionNum>
  <parliamentName>Parliament of South Australia</parliamentName>
  <house>House of Assembly</house>
  <venue></venue>
  <reviewStage>published</reviewStage>
  <startPage num="6619" />
  <endPage num="6724" />
  <dateModified time="2022-08-06T14:30:00+00:00" />
  <proceeding>
    <name>Question Time</name>
    <text id="20160804758de90831364994a0001259">
      <heading>Question Time</heading>
    </text>
    <subject>
      <name>Modbury Hospital</name>
      <text id="20160804758de90831364994a0001260">
        <heading>Modbury Hospital</heading>
      </text>
      <talker role="member" id="4338" kind="question">
        <name>Mr MARSHALL</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">Dunstan</electorate>
        <portfolios>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Leader of the Opposition</name>
          </portfolio>
        </portfolios>
        <questions>
          <question date="2016-08-04">
            <name>Modbury Hospital</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2016-08-04T14:11:53" />
        <text id="20160804758de90831364994a0001261">
          <timeStamp time="2016-08-04T14:11:53" />
          <by role="member" id="4338">Mr MARSHALL (Dunstan—Leader of the Opposition) (14:11):</by>  My question is to the Minister for Health. Will the minister initiate an independent investigation into claims by the President of the Salaried Medical Officers Association that there have been at least three cases of patients experiencing poor outcomes as a result of the downgrade of the Modbury Hospital and that there may well have been avoidable deaths? If not, why not?</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="627" kind="answer">
        <name>The Hon. J.J. SNELLING</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">Playford</electorate>
        <portfolios>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Health</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for the Arts</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Health Industries</name>
          </portfolio>
        </portfolios>
        <questions>
          <question date="2016-08-04">
            <name>Modbury Hospital</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2016-08-04T14:12:16" />
        <text id="20160804758de90831364994a0001262">
          <timeStamp time="2016-08-04T14:12:16" />
          <by role="member" id="627">The Hon. J.J. SNELLING (Playford—Minister for Health, Minister for the Arts, Minister for Health Industries) (14:12):</by>  Because that particular individual, I would take nothing he says at face. That is something I have said before. Second, he certainly doesn't represent the doctors who advise me. The second thing I would say is that if that particular individual is serious about having any matter investigated, we have procedures within the Department for Health.</text>
        <text id="20160804758de90831364994a0001263">
          <event kind="interjection" role="member" id="4338">Mr Marshall interjecting:</event>
        </text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="627" kind="answer" continued="true">
        <name>The Hon. J.J. SNELLING</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20160804758de90831364994a0001264">
          <by role="member" id="627">The Hon. J.J. SNELLING:</by>  He should enter them, use the normal processes—</text>
      </talker>
      <talker kind="speech" role="office">
        <name>The Speaker</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20160804758de90831364994a0001265">
          <by role="office">The SPEAKER:</by>  The leader is called to order and warned.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="627" kind="answer" continued="true">
        <name>The Hon. J.J. SNELLING</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20160804758de90831364994a0001266">
          <by role="member" id="627">The Hon. J.J. SNELLING:</by>  There are established systems that we have in place where any adverse event should be notified. If that individual is aware of anything, he should enter it on the appropriate system and have it investigated in that way.</text>
      </talker>
    </subject>
  </proceeding>
</hansard>