<!--The Official Report of Parliamentary Debates (Hansard) of the Legislative Council and the House of Assembly of the Parliament of South Australia are covered by parliamentary privilege. Republication by others is not afforded the same protection and may result in exposure to legal liability if the material is defamatory. You may copy and make use of excerpts of proceedings where (1) you attribute the Parliament as the source, (2) you assume the risk of liability if the manner of your use is defamatory, (3) you do not use the material for the purpose of advertising, satire or ridicule, or to misrepresent members of Parliament, and (4) your use of the extracts is fair, accurate and not misleading. Copyright in the Official Report of Parliamentary Debates is held by the Attorney-General of South Australia.-->
<hansard id="" tocId="" xml:lang="EN-AU" schemaVersion="1.0" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xml="http://www.w3.org/XML/1998/namespace" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2007/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="hansard_1_0.xsd">
  <name>House of Assembly</name>
  <date date="2016-07-26" />
  <sessionName>Fifty-Third Parliament, Second Session (53-2)</sessionName>
  <parliamentNum>53</parliamentNum>
  <sessionNum>2</sessionNum>
  <parliamentName>Parliament of South Australia</parliamentName>
  <house>House of Assembly</house>
  <venue></venue>
  <reviewStage>published</reviewStage>
  <startPage num="6425" />
  <endPage num="6544" />
  <dateModified time="2022-08-06T14:30:00+00:00" />
  <proceeding continued="true">
    <name>Question Time</name>
    <subject>
      <name>Child Protection Screening</name>
      <text id="201607263a172e9b5195431fa0000588">
        <heading>Child Protection Screening</heading>
      </text>
      <talker role="member" id="4343" kind="question">
        <name>Mr GARDNER</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">Morialta</electorate>
        <questions>
          <question date="2016-07-26">
            <name>Child Protection Screening</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2016-07-26T15:18:49" />
        <text id="201607263a172e9b5195431fa0000589">
          <timeStamp time="2016-07-26T15:18:49" />
          <by role="member" id="4343">Mr GARDNER (Morialta) (15:18):</by>  My question is to the Minister for Education and Child Development. What mechanism does the education department have in place to ensure that parents who have previously failed police checks to volunteer in schools are not now volunteering in their children’s classrooms or coaching sporting teams, given that police checks are no longer required?</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="4622" kind="answer">
        <name>The Hon. S.E. CLOSE</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">Port Adelaide</electorate>
        <portfolios>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Education and Child Development</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Higher Education and Skills</name>
          </portfolio>
        </portfolios>
        <questions>
          <question date="2016-07-26">
            <name>Child Protection Screening</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2016-07-26T15:19:07" />
        <page num="6468" />
        <text id="201607263a172e9b5195431fa0000590">
          <timeStamp time="2016-07-26T15:19:07" />
          <by role="member" id="4622">The Hon. S.E. CLOSE (Port Adelaide—Minister for Education and Child Development, Minister for Higher Education and Skills) (15:19):</by>  I will confirm what internal process is in place but I would just take this opportunity to make two points: one is that if people are questioning what requirements are necessary, as I should have added into my previous answer, they can check on the website, a very handy way of clicking through what category you are in. The other point which is more important in this context is that having a police clearance or a working with children screening clearance is no guarantee that children are safe. It is a useful additional piece of information, and that is why we have it, but by no means ought it be seen as a guarantee.</text>
        <text id="201607263a172e9b5195431fa0000591">What we need to do is make sure that we have ways in which children are cared for by everybody around them to keep eyes on them and to make sure that people are responsible for how their children are looked after. So, while it is important to have these clearances under certain circumstances, their presence or absence should not be regarded as the only gatekeeping for the safety of children. Everyone is responsible, everyone needs to be watching children. We need to make sure that we run our organisations in a way that promotes as much safety and security as possible for parents.</text>
      </talker>
    </subject>
  </proceeding>
</hansard>