<!--The Official Report of Parliamentary Debates (Hansard) of the Legislative Council and the House of Assembly of the Parliament of South Australia are covered by parliamentary privilege. Republication by others is not afforded the same protection and may result in exposure to legal liability if the material is defamatory. You may copy and make use of excerpts of proceedings where (1) you attribute the Parliament as the source, (2) you assume the risk of liability if the manner of your use is defamatory, (3) you do not use the material for the purpose of advertising, satire or ridicule, or to misrepresent members of Parliament, and (4) your use of the extracts is fair, accurate and not misleading. Copyright in the Official Report of Parliamentary Debates is held by the Attorney-General of South Australia.-->
<hansard id="" tocId="" xml:lang="EN-AU" schemaVersion="1.0" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xml="http://www.w3.org/XML/1998/namespace" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2007/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="hansard_1_0.xsd">
  <name>House of Assembly</name>
  <date date="2016-06-21" />
  <sessionName>Fifty-Third Parliament, Second Session (53-2)</sessionName>
  <parliamentNum>53</parliamentNum>
  <sessionNum>2</sessionNum>
  <parliamentName>Parliament of South Australia</parliamentName>
  <house>House of Assembly</house>
  <venue></venue>
  <reviewStage>published</reviewStage>
  <startPage num="5999" />
  <endPage num="6066" />
  <dateModified time="2022-08-06T14:30:00+00:00" />
  <proceeding continued="true">
    <name>Grievance Debate</name>
    <subject>
      <name>Euthanasia</name>
      <text id="20160621cad57ef5bbf4412880000577">
        <heading>Euthanasia</heading>
      </text>
      <talker role="member" id="539" kind="speech">
        <name>The Hon. S.W. KEY</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">Ashford</electorate>
        <startTime time="2016-06-21T15:45:00" />
        <text id="20160621cad57ef5bbf4412880000578">
          <timeStamp time="2016-06-21T15:45:00" />
          <by role="member" id="539">The Hon. S.W. KEY (Ashford) (15:45):</by>  In April this year, Canada introduced draft legislation on doctor-assisted suicide, which applied to adults suffering incurable illness or disability. Prime Minister Justin Trudeau is quoted as saying on this matter:</text>
        <text id="20160621cad57ef5bbf4412880000579">
          <inserted>It's a deeply personal issue that affects all of us and our families and all of us individually as we approach the end of our lives…The plan we have put forward is one that respects Canadians' choices while putting in place the kinds of safeguards needed.</inserted>
        </text>
        <text continued="true" id="20160621cad57ef5bbf4412880000580">Under the law, patients would have a written request for medical assistance and have a designated person to do so if they were unable to. There is a mandatory 15-day waiting period and also an opportunity for the person to change their mind and withdraw the request. Patients would also need to be experiencing enduring and intolerable suffering and death would have to be reasonably foreseeable. Trudeau has also said that other aspects of physician-assisted dying that are not included in the legislation should be put onto the agenda for further consideration.</text>
        <text id="20160621cad57ef5bbf4412880000581">I also read the findings of the Australian Victorian parliament's Legal and Social Issues Committee. They had a 10-month inquiry into end-of-life choices. The report makes some 49 recommendations covering assisted suicide and protecting doctors who prescribe legal drugs. On page 217, the report states:</text>
        <text id="20160621cad57ef5bbf4412880000582">
          <inserted>The Committee's recommended framework allows an adult, with capacity, who is at the end of life and has a serious and incurable condition which is causing enduring and unbearable suffering to request assisted dying.</inserted>
        </text>
        <text continued="true" id="20160621cad57ef5bbf4412880000583">I was also heartened to read in the report:</text>
        <text id="20160621cad57ef5bbf4412880000584">
          <inserted>It is essential that the patient must be experiencing enduring and unbearable suffering that cannot be relieved in a manner which the patient deems tolerable…in the shift towards patient‑centred medicine the Committee believes it is not for others to decide what is and is not tolerable for a patient.</inserted>
        </text>
        <text continued="true" id="20160621cad57ef5bbf4412880000585">The committee heard from more than 100 witnesses, including doctors, legal experts, terminally ill people and their families. These people all gave evidence to the committee. It is interesting to note that a recent article in <term>The Age</term> reported that more than 50 Australian bills have been introduced with regard to assisted suicide and voluntary euthanasia reform since 1993. Sadly, only one has become law, a Northern Territory bill and then act, which as we know was deleted by the federal government.</text>
        <text id="20160621cad57ef5bbf4412880000586">Looking at this issue, it is interesting that people are considering the need for this assistance. While we value and hope that palliative care is available to everybody, other jurisdictions are actually looking at circumstances where palliative care is not enough.</text>
      </talker>
    </subject>
  </proceeding>
</hansard>