<!--The Official Report of Parliamentary Debates (Hansard) of the Legislative Council and the House of Assembly of the Parliament of South Australia are covered by parliamentary privilege. Republication by others is not afforded the same protection and may result in exposure to legal liability if the material is defamatory. You may copy and make use of excerpts of proceedings where (1) you attribute the Parliament as the source, (2) you assume the risk of liability if the manner of your use is defamatory, (3) you do not use the material for the purpose of advertising, satire or ridicule, or to misrepresent members of Parliament, and (4) your use of the extracts is fair, accurate and not misleading. Copyright in the Official Report of Parliamentary Debates is held by the Attorney-General of South Australia.-->
<hansard id="" tocId="" xml:lang="EN-AU" schemaVersion="1.0" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xml="http://www.w3.org/XML/1998/namespace" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2007/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="hansard_1_0.xsd">
  <name>House of Assembly</name>
  <date date="2016-06-07" />
  <sessionName>Fifty-Third Parliament, Second Session (53-2)</sessionName>
  <parliamentNum>53</parliamentNum>
  <sessionNum>2</sessionNum>
  <parliamentName>Parliament of South Australia</parliamentName>
  <house>House of Assembly</house>
  <venue></venue>
  <reviewStage>published</reviewStage>
  <startPage num="5785" />
  <endPage num="5844" />
  <dateModified time="2022-08-06T14:30:00+00:00" />
  <proceeding continued="true">
    <name>Question Time</name>
    <subject>
      <name>Child Protection</name>
      <text id="201606079ca052870f2242bb90000463">
        <heading>Child Protection</heading>
      </text>
      <talker role="member" id="1804" kind="question">
        <name>Ms CHAPMAN</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">Bragg</electorate>
        <portfolios>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Deputy Leader of the Opposition</name>
          </portfolio>
        </portfolios>
        <questions>
          <question date="2016-06-07">
            <name>Child Protection</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2016-06-07T14:49:56" />
        <text id="201606079ca052870f2242bb90000464">
          <timeStamp time="2016-06-07T14:49:56" />
          <by role="member" id="1804">Ms CHAPMAN (Bragg—Deputy Leader of the Opposition) (14:49):</by>  My question is again to the Minister for Child Protection Reform. Given that the head of the department, Mr Tony Harrison, is a former senior police officer, can't he be trusted to undertake a review, at least of the department's involvement in respect of the Hillier deaths, and to report to the parliament, via the minister, and reassure South Australia that this issue is being investigated?</text>
      </talker>
      <talker kind="speech" role="office">
        <name>The Speaker</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="201606079ca052870f2242bb90000465">
          <by role="office">The SPEAKER:</by>  The deputy leader is now debating the question. Minister.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="1810" kind="answer">
        <name>The Hon. J.R. RAU</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">Enfield</electorate>
        <portfolios>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Deputy Premier</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Attorney-General</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Justice Reform</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Planning</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Industrial Relations</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Child Protection Reform</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for the Public Sector</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Consumer and Business Services</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for the City of Adelaide</name>
          </portfolio>
        </portfolios>
        <startTime time="2016-06-07T14:50:30" />
        <text id="201606079ca052870f2242bb90000466">
          <timeStamp time="2016-06-07T14:50:30" />
          <by role="member" id="1810">The Hon. J.R. RAU (Enfield—Deputy Premier, Attorney-General, Minister for Justice Reform, Minister for Planning, Minister for Industrial Relations, Minister for Child Protection Reform, Minister for the Public Sector, Minister for Consumer and Business Services, Minister for the City of Adelaide) (14:50):</by>  Obviously, at the risk of sounding a little bit repetitive, I have made a ministerial statement about this today, and we don't intend to change our position from that—namely, that we just want to vacate the space until the police have done their work. Perhaps I am being unfair here, but I would assume that if we had asked Mr Harrison to go off and conduct an inquiry there might be some cynical comments made about having Caesar looking into Caesar, or something along those lines, and so—</text>
        <text id="201606079ca052870f2242bb90000467">
          <event kind="interjection">Members interjecting:</event>
        </text>
      </talker>
      <talker kind="speech" role="office">
        <name>The Speaker</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="201606079ca052870f2242bb90000468">
          <by role="office">The SPEAKER:</by>  The member for Stuart is called to order and the member for Morphett is warned for the second and final time. The deputy leader is on two warnings.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="1810" kind="answer" continued="true">
        <name>The Hon. J.R. RAU</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="201606079ca052870f2242bb90000469">
          <by role="member" id="1810">The Hon. J.R. RAU:</by>  I am satisfied that the matter is appropriately being dealt with presently, and I would just ask members opposite and some in the media who feel the need to comment on these matters to just hold their fire until they know exactly what is going on. Once we all know what the facts are in this case, we can then analyse what, if any, errors were made</text>
        <text id="201606079ca052870f2242bb90000470">We can also ask ourselves, incidentally, the question as to whether or not the simplistic cause-and-effect type arguments which we get sometimes have any place in these complex situations. It could be said of the person who is involved in a car accident this afternoon that, had they not gotten up in the morning, had they caught a bus—</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="4343">
        <name>Mr GARDNER</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="201606079ca052870f2242bb90000471">
          <by role="member" id="4343">Mr GARDNER:</by>  Point of order by way of allegory: the minister is now debating.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker kind="speech" role="office">
        <name>The Speaker</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="201606079ca052870f2242bb90000472">
          <by role="office">The SPEAKER:</by>  No, the minister is perhaps being desultory, but he is not debating.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="1810" kind="answer" continued="true">
        <name>The Hon. J.R. RAU</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="201606079ca052870f2242bb90000473">
          <by role="member" id="1810">The Hon. J.R. RAU:</by>  Thank you. So that we don't—</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="546" kind="interjection">
        <name>Mr Williams</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="201606079ca052870f2242bb90000474">
          <by role="member" id="546">Mr Williams:</by>  He's not providing information either.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker kind="speech" role="office">
        <name>The Speaker</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="201606079ca052870f2242bb90000475">
          <by role="office">The SPEAKER:</by>  The member for MacKillop is called to order.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="1810" kind="answer" continued="true">
        <name>The Hon. J.R. RAU</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <page num="5819" />
        <text id="201606079ca052870f2242bb90000476">
          <by role="member" id="1810">The Hon. J.R. RAU:</by>  Because I have tried to explain it several times, I am now reducing it to more simple propositions to assist members opposite in understanding what I am saying, which is: we need to understand the facts before we can go off and have an intelligent conversation about what factors, if any, were responsible for this, and how, if at all—and I emphasise 'if at all'—any human action by anybody at any time might have actually had the effect of preventing these events. That turns on what these events are, whether they were foreseeable (wholly or in part) and, if so, by whom. So, let's wait and find out what the facts are.</text>
      </talker>
    </subject>
  </proceeding>
</hansard>