<!--The Official Report of Parliamentary Debates (Hansard) of the Legislative Council and the House of Assembly of the Parliament of South Australia are covered by parliamentary privilege. Republication by others is not afforded the same protection and may result in exposure to legal liability if the material is defamatory. You may copy and make use of excerpts of proceedings where (1) you attribute the Parliament as the source, (2) you assume the risk of liability if the manner of your use is defamatory, (3) you do not use the material for the purpose of advertising, satire or ridicule, or to misrepresent members of Parliament, and (4) your use of the extracts is fair, accurate and not misleading. Copyright in the Official Report of Parliamentary Debates is held by the Attorney-General of South Australia.-->
<hansard id="" tocId="" xml:lang="EN-AU" schemaVersion="1.0" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xml="http://www.w3.org/XML/1998/namespace" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2007/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="hansard_1_0.xsd">
  <name>House of Assembly</name>
  <date date="2016-05-26" />
  <sessionName>Fifty-Third Parliament, Second Session (53-2)</sessionName>
  <parliamentNum>53</parliamentNum>
  <sessionNum>2</sessionNum>
  <parliamentName>Parliament of South Australia</parliamentName>
  <house>House of Assembly</house>
  <venue></venue>
  <reviewStage>published</reviewStage>
  <startPage num="5705" />
  <endPage num="5783" />
  <dateModified time="2022-08-06T14:30:00+00:00" />
  <proceeding continued="true">
    <name>Question Time</name>
    <subject>
      <name>Arrium</name>
      <page num="5742" />
      <text id="201605260522d90f45ce48d4b0000562">
        <heading>Arrium</heading>
      </text>
      <talker role="member" id="4338" kind="question">
        <name>Mr MARSHALL</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">Dunstan</electorate>
        <portfolios>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Leader of the Opposition</name>
          </portfolio>
        </portfolios>
        <questions>
          <question date="2016-05-26">
            <name>Arrium</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2016-05-26T14:28:20" />
        <text id="201605260522d90f45ce48d4b0000563">
          <timeStamp time="2016-05-26T14:28:20" />
          <by role="member" id="4338">Mr MARSHALL (Dunstan—Leader of the Opposition) (14:28):</by>  My question is to the Premier. Can the Premier inform the house what specific measures the state government has or will offer to Arrium and its administrators in order to secure the futures of Whyalla and those affected by the possible closure of the steel plant and the mine?</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="1812" kind="answer">
        <name>The Hon. J.W. WEATHERILL</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">Cheltenham</electorate>
        <portfolios>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Premier</name>
          </portfolio>
        </portfolios>
        <questions>
          <question date="2016-05-26">
            <name>Arrium</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2016-05-26T14:28:40" />
        <text id="201605260522d90f45ce48d4b0000564">
          <timeStamp time="2016-05-26T14:28:40" />
          <by role="member" id="1812">The Hon. J.W. WEATHERILL (Cheltenham—Premier) (14:28):</by>  No, we won't be doing that because we are negotiating in detail those specific measures with both the commonwealth government and the administrators, and it would not serve the interests of the people of Whyalla to publicly speculate about them.</text>
        <text id="201605260522d90f45ce48d4b0000565">I have been speaking in the last few days with both the Prime Minister and the industry minister. We have met, of course, with our own advisers. We are entertaining a very substantial proposition that has been put to us by the administrators, but we have to realise that we are also negotiating in the context of a federal election where we need to have both the federal government and the federal opposition committing to this proposition. We also, frankly, want to see a contribution by both the banks and any potential future purchaser. We don't believe that this is something that should be borne solely by the South Australian or the Australian taxpayer, but we are more than happy to brief the opposition about this matter, just as we have briefed his federal counterparts.</text>
      </talker>
    </subject>
  </proceeding>
</hansard>