<!--The Official Report of Parliamentary Debates (Hansard) of the Legislative Council and the House of Assembly of the Parliament of South Australia are covered by parliamentary privilege. Republication by others is not afforded the same protection and may result in exposure to legal liability if the material is defamatory. You may copy and make use of excerpts of proceedings where (1) you attribute the Parliament as the source, (2) you assume the risk of liability if the manner of your use is defamatory, (3) you do not use the material for the purpose of advertising, satire or ridicule, or to misrepresent members of Parliament, and (4) your use of the extracts is fair, accurate and not misleading. Copyright in the Official Report of Parliamentary Debates is held by the Attorney-General of South Australia.-->
<hansard id="" tocId="" xml:lang="EN-AU" schemaVersion="1.0" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xml="http://www.w3.org/XML/1998/namespace" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2007/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="hansard_1_0.xsd">
  <name>House of Assembly</name>
  <date date="2016-05-25" />
  <sessionName>Fifty-Third Parliament, Second Session (53-2)</sessionName>
  <parliamentNum>53</parliamentNum>
  <sessionNum>2</sessionNum>
  <parliamentName>Parliament of South Australia</parliamentName>
  <house>House of Assembly</house>
  <venue></venue>
  <reviewStage>published</reviewStage>
  <startPage num="5623" />
  <endPage num="5704" />
  <dateModified time="2022-08-06T14:30:00+00:00" />
  <proceeding continued="true">
    <name>Question Time</name>
    <subject>
      <name>Women's and Children's Hospital</name>
      <text id="201605259a3e75eb4936414fa0000446">
        <heading>Women's and Children's Hospital</heading>
      </text>
      <talker role="member" id="4338" kind="question">
        <name>Mr MARSHALL</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">Dunstan</electorate>
        <portfolios>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Leader of the Opposition</name>
          </portfolio>
        </portfolios>
        <questions>
          <question date="2016-05-25">
            <name>Women's and Children's Hospital</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2016-05-25T14:24:31" />
        <text id="201605259a3e75eb4936414fa0000447">
          <timeStamp time="2016-05-25T14:24:31" />
          <by role="member" id="4338">Mr MARSHALL (Dunstan—Leader of the Opposition) (14:24):</by>  My question is to the Minister for Health. Was the audit which identified the use of non-sterilised syringes at the Women's and Children's Hospital part of a systematic audit of hospital practices or was the audit triggered by another event?</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="627" kind="answer">
        <name>The Hon. J.J. SNELLING</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">Playford</electorate>
        <portfolios>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Health</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for the Arts</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Health Industries</name>
          </portfolio>
        </portfolios>
        <questions>
          <question date="2016-05-25">
            <name>Women's and Children's Hospital</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2016-05-25T14:24:49" />
        <text id="201605259a3e75eb4936414fa0000448">
          <timeStamp time="2016-05-25T14:24:49" />
          <by role="member" id="627">The Hon. J.J. SNELLING (Playford—Minister for Health, Minister for the Arts, Minister for Health Industries) (14:24):</by>  To my understanding, it was just part of a routine audit. I don't understand that there was anything in particular that triggered it. It was just part of the routine procedures that the hospital engages in. I can well understand why the Leader of the Opposition is so angry today because, if you look at InDaily, the name Steven Marshall has become a byword for incompetence.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="3124">
        <name>Mr PISONI</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="201605259a3e75eb4936414fa0000449">
          <by role="member" id="3124">Mr PISONI:</by>  Point of order: the minister is entering debate.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker kind="speech" role="office">
        <name>The Speaker</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="201605259a3e75eb4936414fa0000450">
          <by role="office">The SPEAKER:</by>  I uphold the member for Unley's point of order. Does the minister have any more of his ambrosia for us?</text>
        <text id="201605259a3e75eb4936414fa0000451">
          <event kind="interjection">Members interjecting:</event>
        </text>
      </talker>
      <talker kind="speech" role="office">
        <name>The Speaker</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="201605259a3e75eb4936414fa0000452">
          <by role="office">The SPEAKER:</by>  The member for Light—</text>
        <text id="201605259a3e75eb4936414fa0000453">
          <event kind="interjection">Members interjecting:</event>
        </text>
      </talker>
      <talker kind="speech" role="office">
        <name>The Speaker</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="201605259a3e75eb4936414fa0000454">
          <by role="office">The SPEAKER:</by>  The Minister for Investment and Trade and the Minister for Health are called to order, and the leader is reminded that he is on two warnings, and if he opens his mouth again outside standing orders he will be out under the sessional order.</text>
      </talker>
    </subject>
  </proceeding>
</hansard>