<!--The Official Report of Parliamentary Debates (Hansard) of the Legislative Council and the House of Assembly of the Parliament of South Australia are covered by parliamentary privilege. Republication by others is not afforded the same protection and may result in exposure to legal liability if the material is defamatory. You may copy and make use of excerpts of proceedings where (1) you attribute the Parliament as the source, (2) you assume the risk of liability if the manner of your use is defamatory, (3) you do not use the material for the purpose of advertising, satire or ridicule, or to misrepresent members of Parliament, and (4) your use of the extracts is fair, accurate and not misleading. Copyright in the Official Report of Parliamentary Debates is held by the Attorney-General of South Australia.-->
<hansard id="" tocId="" xml:lang="EN-AU" schemaVersion="1.0" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xml="http://www.w3.org/XML/1998/namespace" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2007/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="hansard_1_0.xsd">
  <name>House of Assembly</name>
  <date date="2016-05-19" />
  <sessionName>Fifty-Third Parliament, Second Session (53-2)</sessionName>
  <parliamentNum>53</parliamentNum>
  <sessionNum>2</sessionNum>
  <parliamentName>Parliament of South Australia</parliamentName>
  <house>House of Assembly</house>
  <venue></venue>
  <reviewStage>published</reviewStage>
  <startPage num="5471" />
  <endPage num="5548" />
  <dateModified time="2022-08-06T14:30:00+00:00" />
  <proceeding continued="true">
    <name>Question Time</name>
    <subject>
      <name>Seaford Rail Line</name>
      <text id="20160519fb27ea5b8fe347d180000568">
        <heading>Seaford Rail Line</heading>
      </text>
      <talker role="member" id="3124" kind="question">
        <name>Mr PISONI</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">Unley</electorate>
        <questions>
          <question date="2016-05-19">
            <name>Seaford Rail Line</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2016-05-19T15:02:00" />
        <text id="20160519fb27ea5b8fe347d180000569">
          <timeStamp time="2016-05-19T15:02:00" />
          <by role="member" id="3124">Mr PISONI (Unley) (15:02):</by>  My question is to the Minister for Transport and Infrastructure. What was the outcome of the minister's investigation into the use of asbestos in the new junction buildings on the Seaford line, and has the asbestos been removed? On 28 January, the minister made public statements, and I quote:</text>
        <page num="5513" />
        <text id="20160519fb27ea5b8fe347d180000570">
          <inserted>We're certainly looking to investigate who is responsible for this asbestos being present and making sure that we're pursuing the full criminal and civil sanctions that might be available to the state.</inserted>
        </text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="4842" kind="answer">
        <name>The Hon. S.C. MULLIGHAN</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">Lee</electorate>
        <portfolios>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Transport and Infrastructure</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Housing and Urban Development</name>
          </portfolio>
        </portfolios>
        <questions>
          <question date="2016-05-19">
            <name>Seaford Rail Line</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2016-05-19T15:02:35" />
        <text id="20160519fb27ea5b8fe347d180000571">
          <timeStamp time="2016-05-19T15:02:35" />
          <by role="member" id="4842">The Hon. S.C. MULLIGHAN (Lee—Minister for Transport and Infrastructure, Minister for Housing and Urban Development) (15:02):</by>  I thank the member for Unley for his question. I did say that we would be looking to investigate. It wasn't the royal 'we'; it was 'we' as in government, and I wasn't investigating myself; it was the department that was doing it. They have been undertaking that process, and they have been doing it both between themselves and also with the contractor and SafeWork SA.</text>
        <text id="20160519fb27ea5b8fe347d180000572">My understanding is that they are finalising the recommendations about how that is to be treated. It doesn't necessarily mean that that material will need to be removed. As we made clear to the media at the time, this was part of the subfloor of the facilities which were deemed to have had the materials installed with—</text>
        <text id="20160519fb27ea5b8fe347d180000573">
          <event kind="interjection" role="member" id="3124">Mr Pisoni interjecting:</event>
        </text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="4842" kind="answer" continued="true">
        <name>The Hon. S.C. MULLIGHAN</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20160519fb27ea5b8fe347d180000574">
          <by role="member" id="4842">The Hon. S.C. MULLIGHAN:</by>  Yes, you've had your chance to ask your question. If you didn't frame it properly, then you should do your homework and make a better—</text>
        <text id="20160519fb27ea5b8fe347d180000575">
          <event kind="interjection" role="member" id="3124">Mr Pisoni interjecting:</event>
        </text>
      </talker>
      <talker kind="speech" role="office">
        <name>The Speaker</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20160519fb27ea5b8fe347d180000576">
          <by role="office">The SPEAKER:</by>  The member for Unley is warned for the second time.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="4842" kind="answer" continued="true">
        <name>The Hon. S.C. MULLIGHAN</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="20160519fb27ea5b8fe347d180000577">
          <by role="member" id="4842">The Hon. S.C. MULLIGHAN:</by>  Gee, you're getting out of control, aren't you? It's not going well for you, is it? The second question for the week with two minutes to go—that's pretty average. As I was saying, these investigations have been ongoing between the department and SafeWork, and they are between them determining the best course of action for the treatment of this asbestos.</text>
      </talker>
    </subject>
  </proceeding>
</hansard>