<!--The Official Report of Parliamentary Debates (Hansard) of the Legislative Council and the House of Assembly of the Parliament of South Australia are covered by parliamentary privilege. Republication by others is not afforded the same protection and may result in exposure to legal liability if the material is defamatory. You may copy and make use of excerpts of proceedings where (1) you attribute the Parliament as the source, (2) you assume the risk of liability if the manner of your use is defamatory, (3) you do not use the material for the purpose of advertising, satire or ridicule, or to misrepresent members of Parliament, and (4) your use of the extracts is fair, accurate and not misleading. Copyright in the Official Report of Parliamentary Debates is held by the Attorney-General of South Australia.-->
<hansard id="" tocId="" xml:lang="EN-AU" schemaVersion="1.0" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xml="http://www.w3.org/XML/1998/namespace" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2007/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="hansard_1_0.xsd">
  <name>House of Assembly</name>
  <date date="2016-03-24" />
  <sessionName>Fifty-Third Parliament, Second Session (53-2)</sessionName>
  <parliamentNum>53</parliamentNum>
  <sessionNum>2</sessionNum>
  <parliamentName>Parliament of South Australia</parliamentName>
  <house>House of Assembly</house>
  <venue></venue>
  <reviewStage>published</reviewStage>
  <startPage num="4897" />
  <endPage num="4985" />
  <dateModified time="2022-08-06T14:30:00+00:00" />
  <proceeding continued="true">
    <name>Question Time</name>
    <subject>
      <name>Festival Plaza Car Park</name>
      <page num="4939" />
      <text id="201603248881ef1bca9b406780000658">
        <heading>Festival Plaza Car Park</heading>
      </text>
      <talker role="member" id="1804" kind="question">
        <name>Ms CHAPMAN</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">Bragg</electorate>
        <portfolios>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Deputy Leader of the Opposition</name>
          </portfolio>
        </portfolios>
        <questions>
          <question date="2016-03-24">
            <name>Festival Plaza Car Park</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2016-03-24T14:38:40" />
        <text id="201603248881ef1bca9b406780000659">
          <timeStamp time="2016-03-24T14:38:40" />
          <by role="member" id="1804">Ms CHAPMAN (Bragg—Deputy Leader of the Opposition) (14:38):</by>  My question is again to the Minister for Planning. Has the Walker Corporation sought an extension of time to commence construction of the Festival Plaza car park or, indeed, any other agreement variations to the heads of agreement entered into in respect of the plaza with the government last year?</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="1810" kind="answer">
        <name>The Hon. J.R. RAU</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">Enfield</electorate>
        <portfolios>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Deputy Premier</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Attorney-General</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Justice Reform</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Planning</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Industrial Relations</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Child Protection Reform</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for the Public Sector</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Consumer and Business Services</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for the City of Adelaide</name>
          </portfolio>
        </portfolios>
        <questions>
          <question date="2016-03-24">
            <name>Festival Plaza Car Park</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2016-03-24T14:39:01" />
        <text id="201603248881ef1bca9b406780000660">
          <timeStamp time="2016-03-24T14:39:01" />
          <by role="member" id="1810">The Hon. J.R. RAU (Enfield—Deputy Premier, Attorney-General, Minister for Justice Reform, Minister for Planning, Minister for Industrial Relations, Minister for Child Protection Reform, Minister for the Public Sector, Minister for Consumer and Business Services, Minister for the City of Adelaide) (14:39):</by>  I thank the deputy leader for the question. The situation, as I was trying to explain in the previous answer, is that we had a set of heads of agreement which were settled upon a while ago. For the sake of just being clear about this, the normal commercial practice, I have discovered, is for somebody to enter into what is called 'heads of agreement'. Heads of agreement are not binding legal terms. What they are are heads of agreement and they are, if you like, an agreement to enter into an agreement broadly under the following terms. That is heads of agreement. They have been sitting there for a while. Obviously—</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="4338" kind="interjection">
        <name>Mr Marshall</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="201603248881ef1bca9b406780000661">
          <by role="member" id="4338">Mr Marshall:</by>  Since when?</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="1810" kind="answer" continued="true">
        <name>The Hon. J.R. RAU</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="201603248881ef1bca9b406780000662">
          <by role="member" id="1810">The Hon. J.R. RAU:</by>  I cannot tell you the exact date, but they have been there for a while. There is no question about that.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="4338" kind="interjection">
        <name>Mr Marshall</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="201603248881ef1bca9b406780000663">
          <by role="member" id="4338">Mr Marshall:</by>  Was it 2012 or a bit more recently?</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="1810" kind="answer" continued="true">
        <name>The Hon. J.R. RAU</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="201603248881ef1bca9b406780000664">
          <by role="member" id="1810">The Hon. J.R. RAU:</by>  It was more recently than 2012.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="4338" kind="interjection">
        <name>Mr Marshall</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="201603248881ef1bca9b406780000665">
          <by role="member" id="4338">Mr Marshall:</by>  Is that when they got their exclusivity agreement?</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="1810" kind="answer" continued="true">
        <name>The Hon. J.R. RAU</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="201603248881ef1bca9b406780000666">
          <by role="member" id="1810">The Hon. J.R. RAU:</by>  Can I answer one question at a time? What has happened is that the Crown on behalf of the state government and legal representatives on behalf of Walker are now translating that heads of agreement document into a contract. That contract will be legally binding and it will ultimately be a matter for the government to be satisfied with the terms.</text>
        <text id="201603248881ef1bca9b406780000667">
          <event kind="interjection" role="member" id="1804">Ms Chapman interjecting:</event>
        </text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="1810" kind="answer" continued="true">
        <name>The Hon. J.R. RAU</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="201603248881ef1bca9b406780000668">
          <by role="member" id="1810">The Hon. J.R. RAU:</by>  There is no time under the contract presently—</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="1804" kind="interjection">
        <name>Ms Chapman</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="201603248881ef1bca9b406780000669">
          <by role="member" id="1804">Ms Chapman:</by>  Under the agreement.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="1810" kind="answer" continued="true">
        <name>The Hon. J.R. RAU</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="201603248881ef1bca9b406780000670">
          <by role="member" id="1810">The Hon. J.R. RAU:</by>  I don't think there is any relevant question—</text>
        <text id="201603248881ef1bca9b406780000671">
          <event kind="interjection" role="member" id="1804">Ms Chapman interjecting:</event>
        </text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="1810" kind="answer" continued="true">
        <name>The Hon. J.R. RAU</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="201603248881ef1bca9b406780000672">
          <by role="member" id="1810">The Hon. J.R. RAU:</by>  Is that what it says? Is that what the heads of agreement say? Well, so far, there is no change. So far we are still talking.</text>
        <text id="201603248881ef1bca9b406780000673">
          <event kind="interjection" role="member" id="4338">Mr Marshall interjecting:</event>
        </text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="1810" kind="answer" continued="true">
        <name>The Hon. J.R. RAU</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="201603248881ef1bca9b406780000674">
          <by role="member" id="1810">The Hon. J.R. RAU:</by>  Not as far as I am aware, no, but can I say that there undoubtedly have been, and will continue to be, many matters raised by both the Crown and by Walker in relation to the detailed translation of the heads of agreement into a deed of agreement. Those conversations have been going on for some time, and I am hopeful we might see some end to that conversation in the next couple of weeks. It will be very nice.</text>
      </talker>
    </subject>
  </proceeding>
</hansard>