<!--The Official Report of Parliamentary Debates (Hansard) of the Legislative Council and the House of Assembly of the Parliament of South Australia are covered by parliamentary privilege. Republication by others is not afforded the same protection and may result in exposure to legal liability if the material is defamatory. You may copy and make use of excerpts of proceedings where (1) you attribute the Parliament as the source, (2) you assume the risk of liability if the manner of your use is defamatory, (3) you do not use the material for the purpose of advertising, satire or ridicule, or to misrepresent members of Parliament, and (4) your use of the extracts is fair, accurate and not misleading. Copyright in the Official Report of Parliamentary Debates is held by the Attorney-General of South Australia.-->
<hansard id="" tocId="" xml:lang="EN-AU" schemaVersion="1.0" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xml="http://www.w3.org/XML/1998/namespace" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2007/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="hansard_1_0.xsd">
  <name>House of Assembly</name>
  <date date="2016-03-09" />
  <sessionName>Fifty-Third Parliament, Second Session (53-2)</sessionName>
  <parliamentNum>53</parliamentNum>
  <sessionNum>2</sessionNum>
  <parliamentName>Parliament of South Australia</parliamentName>
  <house>House of Assembly</house>
  <venue></venue>
  <reviewStage>published</reviewStage>
  <startPage num="4585" />
  <endPage num="4677" />
  <dateModified time="2022-08-06T14:30:00+00:00" />
  <proceeding>
    <name>Question Time</name>
    <text id="201603094d540920e1be42ddb0001011">
      <heading>Question Time</heading>
    </text>
    <subject>
      <name>Child Protection</name>
      <text id="201603094d540920e1be42ddb0001012">
        <heading>Child Protection</heading>
      </text>
      <talker role="member" id="4338" kind="question">
        <name>Mr MARSHALL</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">Dunstan</electorate>
        <portfolios>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Leader of the Opposition</name>
          </portfolio>
        </portfolios>
        <questions>
          <question date="2016-03-09">
            <name>Child Protection</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2016-03-09T14:20:09" />
        <text id="201603094d540920e1be42ddb0001013">
          <timeStamp time="2016-03-09T14:20:09" />
          <by role="member" id="4338">Mr MARSHALL (Dunstan—Leader of the Opposition) (14:20):</by>  Has the government sought any interim recommendations from the royal commissioner regarding where the child protection agency should be located?</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="1810" kind="answer">
        <name>The Hon. J.R. RAU</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">Enfield</electorate>
        <portfolios>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Deputy Premier</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Attorney-General</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Justice Reform</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Planning</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Industrial Relations</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Child Protection Reform</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for the Public Sector</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Consumer and Business Services</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for the City of Adelaide</name>
          </portfolio>
        </portfolios>
        <questions>
          <question date="2016-03-09">
            <name>Child Protection</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2016-03-09T14:20:20" />
        <text id="201603094d540920e1be42ddb0001014">
          <timeStamp time="2016-03-09T14:20:20" />
          <by role="member" id="1810">The Hon. J.R. RAU (Enfield—Deputy Premier, Attorney-General, Minister for Justice Reform, Minister for Planning, Minister for Industrial Relations, Minister for Child Protection Reform, Minister for the Public Sector, Minister for Consumer and Business Services, Minister for the City of Adelaide) (14:20):</by>  Mr Speaker, no we don't, and it would be—</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="4338" kind="interjection">
        <name>Mr Marshall</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="201603094d540920e1be42ddb0001015">
          <by role="member" id="4338">Mr Marshall:</by>  Why?</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="1810" kind="answer" continued="true">
        <name>The Hon. J.R. RAU</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <page num="4634" />
        <text id="201603094d540920e1be42ddb0001016">
          <by role="member" id="1810">The Hon. J.R. RAU:</by>  Why don't we? Because Commissioner Nyland has not chosen to provide us with an interim recommendation at this point in time. However, I would be happy to say to members present today that the minister and I did actually have a meeting with the commissioner this morning, and—</text>
        <text id="201603094d540920e1be42ddb0001017">
          <event kind="interjection">Members interjecting:</event>
        </text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="1810" kind="answer" continued="true">
        <name>The Hon. J.R. RAU</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="201603094d540920e1be42ddb0001018">
          <by role="member" id="1810">The Hon. J.R. RAU:</by>  We had a meeting with her this morning and I did convey to her the notion that, so far as the government was concerned, if she did wish to offer any sort of interim recommendations or give us an early heads-up as to where she was going, then that would be beneficial, because we could commence the process of considering whatever it was that she was recommending sooner rather than later.</text>
        <text id="201603094d540920e1be42ddb0001019">I have left her with that thought. I think, judging from her response, she saw some merit in that. If she came to a clear decision about something and it was inevitably going to be in her report, and she got to that point, I think she sees the wisdom in sharing that with us at the moment, as a recommendation. But, at this point in time, as to the question asked: no, we don't, but I have certainly encouraged her to feel free to do that.</text>
      </talker>
    </subject>
  </proceeding>
</hansard>