<!--The Official Report of Parliamentary Debates (Hansard) of the Legislative Council and the House of Assembly of the Parliament of South Australia are covered by parliamentary privilege. Republication by others is not afforded the same protection and may result in exposure to legal liability if the material is defamatory. You may copy and make use of excerpts of proceedings where (1) you attribute the Parliament as the source, (2) you assume the risk of liability if the manner of your use is defamatory, (3) you do not use the material for the purpose of advertising, satire or ridicule, or to misrepresent members of Parliament, and (4) your use of the extracts is fair, accurate and not misleading. Copyright in the Official Report of Parliamentary Debates is held by the Attorney-General of South Australia.-->
<hansard id="" tocId="" xml:lang="EN-AU" schemaVersion="1.0" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xml="http://www.w3.org/XML/1998/namespace" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2007/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="hansard_1_0.xsd">
  <name>House of Assembly</name>
  <date date="2016-02-25" />
  <sessionName>Fifty-Third Parliament, Second Session (53-2)</sessionName>
  <parliamentNum>53</parliamentNum>
  <sessionNum>2</sessionNum>
  <parliamentName>Parliament of South Australia</parliamentName>
  <house>House of Assembly</house>
  <venue></venue>
  <reviewStage>published</reviewStage>
  <startPage num="4449" />
  <endPage num="4517" />
  <dateModified time="2022-08-06T14:30:00+00:00" />
  <proceeding continued="true">
    <name>Question Time</name>
    <subject>
      <name>Hospital Management Investigation</name>
      <text id="201602254d101c6fb31c4795b0000394">
        <heading>Hospital Management Investigation</heading>
      </text>
      <talker role="member" id="4338" kind="question">
        <name>Mr MARSHALL</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">Dunstan</electorate>
        <portfolios>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Leader of the Opposition</name>
          </portfolio>
        </portfolios>
        <questions>
          <question date="2016-02-25">
            <name>Hospital Management Investigation</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2016-02-25T14:10:15" />
        <text id="201602254d101c6fb31c4795b0000395">
          <timeStamp time="2016-02-25T14:10:15" />
          <by role="member" id="4338">Mr MARSHALL (Dunstan—Leader of the Opposition) (14:10):</by>  Therefore the following question is: if you are not routinely informed of a breach or unauthorised access to private medical records, is it quite possible that there are a huge number of unauthorised accesses made on a continuing basis that are just simply not brought to your attention because of the policy of your department?</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="627" kind="answer">
        <name>The Hon. J.J. SNELLING</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">Playford</electorate>
        <portfolios>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Health</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for the Arts</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Health Industries</name>
          </portfolio>
        </portfolios>
        <questions>
          <question date="2016-02-25">
            <name>Hospital Management Investigation</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2016-02-25T14:10:30" />
        <text id="201602254d101c6fb31c4795b0000396">
          <timeStamp time="2016-02-25T14:10:30" />
          <by role="member" id="627">The Hon. J.J. SNELLING (Playford—Minister for Health, Minister for the Arts, Minister for Health Industries) (14:10):</by>  I can say probably what has happened in the past with paper records is that there have been breaches, and probably many breaches, and we would never know when and how those breaches would have been done, because with paper records there is very little control over who has access to those papers and who has access to those medical records, how frequently they have done it and whether they have had cause to have a look at those medical records.</text>
        <text id="201602254d101c6fb31c4795b0000397">Now, with regard to these electronic records, let us make something quite clear: we had a policy in place which detected this breach. People looked at these records who should not have. They were detected and they have been disciplined, and in the case of the other instances where this has happened then, again, that has happened.</text>
        <page num="4480" />
        <text id="201602254d101c6fb31c4795b0000398">I am confident that this is not a widespread occurrence. Certainly it is not a widespread occurrence with electronic health records, because we do have the ability to monitor who looks at those records in a way that we do not with old paper-based records. I can be quite confident that, given the publicity surrounding this case, all SA Health employees will think more than twice before they dare look at a record which they are not entitled to have a look at.</text>
      </talker>
    </subject>
  </proceeding>
</hansard>