<!--The Official Report of Parliamentary Debates (Hansard) of the Legislative Council and the House of Assembly of the Parliament of South Australia are covered by parliamentary privilege. Republication by others is not afforded the same protection and may result in exposure to legal liability if the material is defamatory. You may copy and make use of excerpts of proceedings where (1) you attribute the Parliament as the source, (2) you assume the risk of liability if the manner of your use is defamatory, (3) you do not use the material for the purpose of advertising, satire or ridicule, or to misrepresent members of Parliament, and (4) your use of the extracts is fair, accurate and not misleading. Copyright in the Official Report of Parliamentary Debates is held by the Attorney-General of South Australia.-->
<hansard id="" tocId="" xml:lang="EN-AU" schemaVersion="1.0" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xml="http://www.w3.org/XML/1998/namespace" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2007/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="hansard_1_0.xsd">
  <name>House of Assembly</name>
  <date date="2016-02-23" />
  <sessionName>Fifty-Third Parliament, Second Session (53-2)</sessionName>
  <parliamentNum>53</parliamentNum>
  <sessionNum>2</sessionNum>
  <parliamentName>Parliament of South Australia</parliamentName>
  <house>House of Assembly</house>
  <venue></venue>
  <reviewStage>published</reviewStage>
  <startPage num="4309" />
  <endPage num="4373" />
  <dateModified time="2022-08-06T14:30:00+00:00" />
  <proceeding continued="true">
    <name>Question Time</name>
    <subject>
      <name>Hospital Management Investigation</name>
      <text id="20160223495e4fa3ffdd479cb0000499">
        <heading>Hospital Management Investigation</heading>
      </text>
      <talker role="member" id="1804" kind="question">
        <name>Ms CHAPMAN</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">Bragg</electorate>
        <portfolios>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Deputy Leader of the Opposition</name>
          </portfolio>
        </portfolios>
        <questions>
          <question date="2016-02-23">
            <name>Hospital Management Investigation</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2016-02-23T14:49:04" />
        <text id="20160223495e4fa3ffdd479cb0000500">
          <timeStamp time="2016-02-23T14:49:04" />
          <by role="member" id="1804">Ms CHAPMAN (Bragg—Deputy Leader of the Opposition) (14:49):</by>  Supplementary to the Minister for Health: when you check in respect of this matter, which has been already outlined to the parliament, will you inquire as to whether a report on that matter can be tabled in the parliament?</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="627" kind="answer">
        <name>The Hon. J.J. SNELLING</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">Playford</electorate>
        <portfolios>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Health</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for the Arts</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Health Industries</name>
          </portfolio>
        </portfolios>
        <questions>
          <question date="2016-02-23">
            <name>Hospital Management Investigation</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2016-02-23T14:49:20" />
        <page num="4344" />
        <text id="20160223495e4fa3ffdd479cb0000501">
          <timeStamp time="2016-02-23T14:49:20" />
          <by role="member" id="627">The Hon. J.J. SNELLING (Playford—Minister for Health, Minister for the Arts, Minister for Health Industries) (14:49):</by>  Again, I will check. Normally, legal advice that comes from the Crown is not something that we would table or make public but, again, I am more than happy to check. There is no doubt that the action that, I think from memory, several clinicians took in changing that patient's record should not have been done. The fact is, however, that because of the electronic health record that we had, while they were able to make it nonvisible, they were not able to actually destroy the record, so the record has now been restored to how it was. I will need to get some advice on what is the latest information on what is happening in this matter.</text>
      </talker>
    </subject>
  </proceeding>
</hansard>