<!--The Official Report of Parliamentary Debates (Hansard) of the Legislative Council and the House of Assembly of the Parliament of South Australia are covered by parliamentary privilege. Republication by others is not afforded the same protection and may result in exposure to legal liability if the material is defamatory. You may copy and make use of excerpts of proceedings where (1) you attribute the Parliament as the source, (2) you assume the risk of liability if the manner of your use is defamatory, (3) you do not use the material for the purpose of advertising, satire or ridicule, or to misrepresent members of Parliament, and (4) your use of the extracts is fair, accurate and not misleading. Copyright in the Official Report of Parliamentary Debates is held by the Attorney-General of South Australia.-->
<hansard id="" tocId="" xml:lang="EN-AU" schemaVersion="1.0" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xml="http://www.w3.org/XML/1998/namespace" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2007/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="hansard_1_0.xsd">
  <name>House of Assembly</name>
  <date date="2016-02-11" />
  <sessionName>Fifty-Third Parliament, Second Session (53-2)</sessionName>
  <parliamentNum>53</parliamentNum>
  <sessionNum>2</sessionNum>
  <parliamentName>Parliament of South Australia</parliamentName>
  <house>House of Assembly</house>
  <venue></venue>
  <reviewStage>published</reviewStage>
  <startPage num="4227" />
  <endPage num="4308" />
  <dateModified time="2022-08-06T14:30:00+00:00" />
  <proceeding continued="true">
    <name>Question Time</name>
    <subject>
      <name>Daw Park Site</name>
      <text id="20160211c873678b529d4e6e90000673">
        <heading>Daw Park Site</heading>
      </text>
      <talker role="member" id="4338" kind="question">
        <name>Mr MARSHALL</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">Dunstan</electorate>
        <portfolios>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Leader of the Opposition</name>
          </portfolio>
        </portfolios>
        <questions>
          <question date="2016-02-11">
            <name>Daw Park Site</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2016-02-11T14:32:01" />
        <text id="20160211c873678b529d4e6e90000674">
          <timeStamp time="2016-02-11T14:32:01" />
          <by role="member" id="4338">Mr MARSHALL (Dunstan—Leader of the Opposition) (14:32):</by>  My question is to the Minister for Health. Is part of the ViTA building at Daw Park an SA Health-owned asset accommodating SA Health patients?</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="627" kind="answer">
        <name>The Hon. J.J. SNELLING</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">Playford</electorate>
        <portfolios>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Health</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for the Arts</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Health Industries</name>
          </portfolio>
        </portfolios>
        <questions>
          <question date="2016-02-11">
            <name>Daw Park Site</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2016-02-11T14:32:14" />
        <text id="20160211c873678b529d4e6e90000675">
          <timeStamp time="2016-02-11T14:32:14" />
          <by role="member" id="627">The Hon. J.J. SNELLING (Playford—Minister for Health, Minister for the Arts, Minister for Health Industries) (14:32):</by>  No, it's not, as I understand it. I'll double-check, but my understanding is it's not an SA Health owned property: it is part of the ViTA building which we rent, and we have patients and clinicians, on occasions at least, in there. I'm happy to get more information and bring it to the house.</text>
      </talker>
    </subject>
  </proceeding>
</hansard>