<!--The Official Report of Parliamentary Debates (Hansard) of the Legislative Council and the House of Assembly of the Parliament of South Australia are covered by parliamentary privilege. Republication by others is not afforded the same protection and may result in exposure to legal liability if the material is defamatory. You may copy and make use of excerpts of proceedings where (1) you attribute the Parliament as the source, (2) you assume the risk of liability if the manner of your use is defamatory, (3) you do not use the material for the purpose of advertising, satire or ridicule, or to misrepresent members of Parliament, and (4) your use of the extracts is fair, accurate and not misleading. Copyright in the Official Report of Parliamentary Debates is held by the Attorney-General of South Australia.-->
<hansard id="" tocId="" xml:lang="EN-AU" schemaVersion="1.0" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xml="http://www.w3.org/XML/1998/namespace" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2007/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="hansard_1_0.xsd">
  <name>House of Assembly</name>
  <date date="2016-02-10" />
  <sessionName>Fifty-Third Parliament, Second Session (53-2)</sessionName>
  <parliamentNum>53</parliamentNum>
  <sessionNum>2</sessionNum>
  <parliamentName>Parliament of South Australia</parliamentName>
  <house>House of Assembly</house>
  <venue></venue>
  <reviewStage>published</reviewStage>
  <startPage num="4157" />
  <endPage num="4226" />
  <dateModified time="2022-08-06T14:30:00+00:00" />
  <proceeding continued="true">
    <name>Question Time</name>
    <subject>
      <name>Alcohol and Other Drug Strategy</name>
      <text id="201602107f03ed9055264232b0000608">
        <heading>Alcohol and Other Drug Strategy</heading>
      </text>
      <talker role="member" id="4991" kind="question">
        <name>Mr DULUK</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">Davenport</electorate>
        <questions>
          <question date="2016-02-10">
            <name>Alcohol and Other Drug Strategy</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2016-02-10T15:50:20" />
        <text id="201602107f03ed9055264232b0000609">
          <timeStamp time="2016-02-10T15:50:20" />
          <by role="member" id="4991">Mr DULUK (Davenport) (15:50):</by>  My question is to the Minister for Mental Health and Substance Abuse. Can the minister advise why funding for the Treatment Intervention Program ceased and funding for the Aboriginal Connection Program reduced despite it being reported that both programs were effective and exceeding KPIs in the government's 2014 Alcohol and Other Drug Strategy Progress Report?</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="4336" kind="answer">
        <name>The Hon. L.A. VLAHOS</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">Taylor</electorate>
        <portfolios>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Disabilities</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Mental Health and Substance Abuse</name>
          </portfolio>
        </portfolios>
        <questions>
          <question date="2016-02-10">
            <name>Alcohol and Other Drug Strategy</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2016-02-10T15:51:10" />
        <text id="201602107f03ed9055264232b0000610">
          <timeStamp time="2016-02-10T15:51:10" />
          <by role="member" id="4336">The Hon. L.A. VLAHOS (Taylor—Minister for Disabilities, Minister for Mental Health and Substance Abuse) (15:51):</by>  I thank the member for Davenport for his question. The 2014 South Australian Alcohol and Other Drug Strategy Progress Report demonstrates the government's ongoing multi-agency approach to this area. Certainly, of the 60 different points that were done in the report, the vast majority have been implemented. Only one is marked as red and not being pursued at this point in time. One reason for that is because of the federal government changing the way in which it chose to progress funding in that area, and another one is in relation to a change of portfolios to the Attorney-General's budgeting area.</text>
      </talker>
    </subject>
  </proceeding>
</hansard>