<!--The Official Report of Parliamentary Debates (Hansard) of the Legislative Council and the House of Assembly of the Parliament of South Australia are covered by parliamentary privilege. Republication by others is not afforded the same protection and may result in exposure to legal liability if the material is defamatory. You may copy and make use of excerpts of proceedings where (1) you attribute the Parliament as the source, (2) you assume the risk of liability if the manner of your use is defamatory, (3) you do not use the material for the purpose of advertising, satire or ridicule, or to misrepresent members of Parliament, and (4) your use of the extracts is fair, accurate and not misleading. Copyright in the Official Report of Parliamentary Debates is held by the Attorney-General of South Australia.-->
<hansard id="" tocId="" xml:lang="EN-AU" schemaVersion="1.0" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xml="http://www.w3.org/XML/1998/namespace" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2007/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="hansard_1_0.xsd">
  <name>House of Assembly</name>
  <date date="2016-02-09" />
  <sessionName>Fifty-Third Parliament, Second Session (53-2)</sessionName>
  <parliamentNum>53</parliamentNum>
  <sessionNum>2</sessionNum>
  <parliamentName>Parliament of South Australia</parliamentName>
  <house>House of Assembly</house>
  <venue></venue>
  <reviewStage>published</reviewStage>
  <startPage num="4087" />
  <endPage num="4156" />
  <dateModified time="2022-08-06T14:30:00+00:00" />
  <proceeding continued="true">
    <name>Question Time</name>
    <subject>
      <name>Rail Maintenance</name>
      <text id="201602096358e6fcf4b4452bb0000679">
        <heading>Rail Maintenance</heading>
      </text>
      <talker role="member" id="4991" kind="question">
        <name>Mr DULUK</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">Davenport</electorate>
        <questions>
          <question date="2016-02-09">
            <name>Rail Maintenance</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2016-02-09T16:00:51" />
        <text id="201602096358e6fcf4b4452bb0000680">
          <timeStamp time="2016-02-09T16:00:51" />
          <by role="member" id="4991">Mr DULUK (Davenport) (16:00):</by>  My question is to the Minister for Transport and Infrastructure. Can the minister please outline why essential maintenance work that closed the Belair line over the Christmas holiday period has failed to address the ongoing issues with the Glenalta and Blackwood boom gates, which have already been stuck on several occasions this year?</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="4842" kind="answer">
        <name>The Hon. S.C. MULLIGHAN</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">Lee</electorate>
        <portfolios>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Transport and Infrastructure</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Housing and Urban Development</name>
          </portfolio>
        </portfolios>
        <questions>
          <question date="2016-02-09">
            <name>Rail Maintenance</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2016-02-09T16:01:15" />
        <text id="201602096358e6fcf4b4452bb0000681">
          <timeStamp time="2016-02-09T16:01:15" />
          <by role="member" id="4842">The Hon. S.C. MULLIGHAN (Lee—Minister for Transport and Infrastructure, Minister for Housing and Urban Development) (16:01):</by>  I thank the member for Davenport for his question. I know he has expressed an interest in this area. As part of the most recent state budget, a figure of $12 million was provided to upgrade some of the signalling infrastructure and equipment across the metropolitan passenger rail network line. There is a system underway of progressively undertaking those works.</text>
        <text id="201602096358e6fcf4b4452bb0000682">My understanding, although I am happy to come back to the house with some further detail, is that that program is being based upon an analysis of the priority of undertaking those works, and doing those works at those locations where they are most needed, perhaps as a direct reflection on the condition of some of the equipment which needs to be replaced under the program. So, I will take the timing of those works, if they are part of the program, on notice and come back to the member.</text>
      </talker>
    </subject>
  </proceeding>
</hansard>