<!--The Official Report of Parliamentary Debates (Hansard) of the Legislative Council and the House of Assembly of the Parliament of South Australia are covered by parliamentary privilege. Republication by others is not afforded the same protection and may result in exposure to legal liability if the material is defamatory. You may copy and make use of excerpts of proceedings where (1) you attribute the Parliament as the source, (2) you assume the risk of liability if the manner of your use is defamatory, (3) you do not use the material for the purpose of advertising, satire or ridicule, or to misrepresent members of Parliament, and (4) your use of the extracts is fair, accurate and not misleading. Copyright in the Official Report of Parliamentary Debates is held by the Attorney-General of South Australia.-->
<hansard id="" tocId="" xml:lang="EN-AU" schemaVersion="1.0" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xml="http://www.w3.org/XML/1998/namespace" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2007/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="hansard_1_0.xsd">
  <name>House of Assembly</name>
  <date date="2015-12-01" />
  <sessionName>Fifty-Third Parliament, Second Session (53-2)</sessionName>
  <parliamentNum>53</parliamentNum>
  <sessionNum>2</sessionNum>
  <parliamentName>Parliament of South Australia</parliamentName>
  <house>House of Assembly</house>
  <venue></venue>
  <reviewStage>published</reviewStage>
  <startPage num="3779" />
  <endPage num="3872" />
  <dateModified time="2022-08-06T14:30:00+00:00" />
  <proceeding continued="true">
    <name>Question Time</name>
    <subject>
      <name>Goods and Services Tax</name>
      <text id="2015120123d0da0bec994dcda0000434">
        <heading>Goods and Services Tax</heading>
      </text>
      <talker role="member" id="4338" kind="question">
        <name>Mr MARSHALL</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">Dunstan</electorate>
        <portfolios>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Leader of the Opposition</name>
          </portfolio>
        </portfolios>
        <questions>
          <question date="2015-12-01">
            <name>Goods and Services Tax</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2015-12-01T14:35:26" />
        <text id="2015120123d0da0bec994dcda0000435">
          <timeStamp time="2015-12-01T14:35:26" />
          <by role="member" id="4338">Mr MARSHALL (Dunstan—Leader of the Opposition) (14:35):</by>  My supplementary to the Premier is: what will be the jobs impact in South Australia of an increase of 50 per cent to the GST rate?</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="1812" kind="answer">
        <name>The Hon. J.W. WEATHERILL</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">Cheltenham</electorate>
        <portfolios>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Premier</name>
          </portfolio>
        </portfolios>
        <questions>
          <question date="2015-12-01">
            <name>Goods and Services Tax</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2015-12-01T14:35:37" />
        <text id="2015120123d0da0bec994dcda0000436">
          <timeStamp time="2015-12-01T14:35:37" />
          <by role="member" id="1812">The Hon. J.W. WEATHERILL (Cheltenham—Premier) (14:35):</by>  It depends whether the commonwealth decides to press ahead with such an idea. It's a commonwealth tax and our proposition is, if they indeed want to pursue their agenda of changing the tax mix then presumably they will do some modelling based on the movement between indirect and direct taxes. People are utterly sick of this idea of trying to take out little elements of the tax reform debate and run scare campaigns. They are sick of it. They are sick of that sort of approach. </text>
        <text id="2015120123d0da0bec994dcda0000437">We are trying to put a sensible, constructive idea to break a deadlock in the national debate, for which we are getting credit (credit from some of your federal colleagues). Instead, we come here and we get the petty point scoring that you would expect from a low rent opposition that has no ideas about the future. Why is there a serious debate occurring on a national basis and you come into this place and you get these penny-pinching questions, trying to reduce the debate down to quick, cheap grabs?</text>
        <text id="2015120123d0da0bec994dcda0000438">
          <event kind="interjection" role="member" id="4338">Mr Marshall interjecting:</event>
        </text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="1812" kind="answer" continued="true">
        <name>The Hon. J.W. WEATHERILL</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="2015120123d0da0bec994dcda0000439">
          <by role="member" id="1812">The Hon. J.W. WEATHERILL:</by>  No, just quick, cheap grabs; cheap ideas. If your federal counterparts think there is a massive dividend, if your federal counterparts think there is, in fact, a massive efficiency dividend in shifting from direct to indirect taxation, which is at the heart of this, because there is another simple solution, we could just increase rates of direct taxation, that's another way of solving this dilemma, but they have ruled that out—</text>
        <text id="2015120123d0da0bec994dcda0000440">
          <event kind="interjection">Members interjecting:</event>
        </text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="1812" kind="answer" continued="true">
        <name>The Hon. J.W. WEATHERILL</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="2015120123d0da0bec994dcda0000441">
          <by role="member" id="1812">The Hon. J.W. WEATHERILL:</by>  We didn't cut $80 billion out of state and territory budgets. Your mates saw that those opposite—</text>
      </talker>
      <talker kind="speech" role="office">
        <name>The Speaker</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="2015120123d0da0bec994dcda0000442">
          <by role="office">The SPEAKER:</by>  I don't have—</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="1812" kind="answer" continued="true">
        <name>The Hon. J.W. WEATHERILL</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <page num="3809" />
        <text id="2015120123d0da0bec994dcda0000443">
          <by role="member" id="1812">The Hon. J.W. WEATHERILL:</by>  No, you don't have mates over there, sorry.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker kind="speech" role="office">
        <name>The Speaker</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="2015120123d0da0bec994dcda0000444">
          <by role="office">The SPEAKER:</by>  I don't have federal counterparts.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="1812" kind="answer" continued="true">
        <name>The Hon. J.W. WEATHERILL</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="2015120123d0da0bec994dcda0000445">
          <by role="member" id="1812">The Hon. J.W. WEATHERILL:</by>  Those opposite and their friends in the national parliament took $80 billion out of our collective state and territory budgets. We were opposed to that. There were shrieks of silence when those opposite heard these things, they crawled away into a corner and pretended it did not happen. We were the only ones who were actually on this picket line raising our voice. Now everyone is there and we are all talking, collectively across the nation, about the difficulties of these cuts. So, don't agitate your issues with me, go and speak to your—</text>
        <text id="2015120123d0da0bec994dcda0000446">
          <event kind="interjection">Members interjecting:</event>
        </text>
      </talker>
      <talker kind="speech" role="office">
        <name>The Speaker</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="2015120123d0da0bec994dcda0000447">
          <by role="office">The SPEAKER:</by>  Yes, I call the Premier to order.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="1812" kind="answer" continued="true">
        <name>The Hon. J.W. WEATHERILL</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="2015120123d0da0bec994dcda0000448">
          <by role="member" id="1812">The Hon. J.W. WEATHERILL:</by>  Sorry. Those opposite should speak to their colleagues in the national parliament. They shouldn't agitate their grievance with me, Mr Speaker, they should agitate their grievance with the people they seem to have a difficulty with; that is, people who are speaking lovingly about an increase in the GST in the federal Liberal Party at a national level.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker kind="speech" role="office">
        <name>The Speaker</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="2015120123d0da0bec994dcda0000449">
          <by role="office">The SPEAKER:</by>  I call to order the members for Unley, Stuart and Goyder and I warn for the first time the leader and the member for Chaffey. Supplementary, leader.</text>
      </talker>
    </subject>
  </proceeding>
</hansard>