<!--The Official Report of Parliamentary Debates (Hansard) of the Legislative Council and the House of Assembly of the Parliament of South Australia are covered by parliamentary privilege. Republication by others is not afforded the same protection and may result in exposure to legal liability if the material is defamatory. You may copy and make use of excerpts of proceedings where (1) you attribute the Parliament as the source, (2) you assume the risk of liability if the manner of your use is defamatory, (3) you do not use the material for the purpose of advertising, satire or ridicule, or to misrepresent members of Parliament, and (4) your use of the extracts is fair, accurate and not misleading. Copyright in the Official Report of Parliamentary Debates is held by the Attorney-General of South Australia.-->
<hansard id="" tocId="" xml:lang="EN-AU" schemaVersion="1.0" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xml="http://www.w3.org/XML/1998/namespace" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2007/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="hansard_1_0.xsd">
  <name>House of Assembly</name>
  <date date="2015-11-18" />
  <sessionName>Fifty-Third Parliament, Second Session (53-2)</sessionName>
  <parliamentNum>53</parliamentNum>
  <sessionNum>2</sessionNum>
  <parliamentName>Parliament of South Australia</parliamentName>
  <house>House of Assembly</house>
  <venue></venue>
  <reviewStage>published</reviewStage>
  <startPage num="3563" />
  <endPage num="3681" />
  <dateModified time="2022-08-06T14:30:00+00:00" />
  <proceeding continued="true">
    <name>Question Time</name>
    <subject>
      <name>Police Workers Compensation</name>
      <text id="2015111874c0a1af11874fdfa0000361">
        <heading>Police Workers Compensation</heading>
      </text>
      <talker role="member" id="4343" kind="question">
        <name>Mr GARDNER</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">Morialta</electorate>
        <questions>
          <question date="2015-11-18">
            <name>Police Workers Compensation</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2015-11-18T14:19:33" />
        <text id="2015111874c0a1af11874fdfa0000362">
          <timeStamp time="2015-11-18T14:19:33" />
          <by role="member" id="4343">Mr GARDNER (Morialta) (14:19):</by>  Supplementary: is the Deputy Premier able to identify the individual who he referred to throughout that answer as 'that man'? In particular, given that he knows about the interim determination that has been provided by the police commissioner, does the Deputy Premier have any advice as to whether the individual concerned would meet the 30 per cent threshold?</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="1810" kind="answer">
        <name>The Hon. J.R. RAU</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">Enfield</electorate>
        <portfolios>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Deputy Premier</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Attorney-General</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Justice Reform</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Planning</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Housing and Urban Development</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Industrial Relations</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Child Protection Reform</name>
          </portfolio>
        </portfolios>
        <questions>
          <question date="2015-11-18">
            <name>Police Workers Compensation</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2015-11-18T14:19:58" />
        <text id="2015111874c0a1af11874fdfa0000363">
          <timeStamp time="2015-11-18T14:19:58" />
          <by role="member" id="1810">The Hon. J.R. RAU (Enfield—Deputy Premier, Attorney-General, Minister for Justice Reform, Minister for Planning, Minister for Housing and Urban Development, Minister for Industrial Relations, Minister for Child Protection Reform) (14:19):</by>  The effect of the interim determination is to mean that he is in a position where he is deemed to be 30 per cent plus. As I understand it, again from stuff in the media and things which have been said by Mr Carroll, his injuries are such that he will require ongoing surgery potentially for years.</text>
        <text id="2015111874c0a1af11874fdfa0000364">People might also be interested to know that the legislation provides for anybody, not just police officers, who finds themselves in that position. Ongoing surgery out beyond two, three or whatever years, is covered by the legislation, including time for them to recover from that surgery. That is already covered.</text>
        <text id="2015111874c0a1af11874fdfa0000365">The ultimate question is that at some point in the medium or distant future, when a stable condition is arrived at—and that is a matter for the determination of the individual injured person, not for my determination or the police commissioner's—that person can apply for a whole person impairment assessment at that time, whenever that may be, and in this case that may be many, many years. At that point in time, there will be a determination. At the moment, we have an interim determination and the interim determination says 30 per cent plus.</text>
      </talker>
    </subject>
  </proceeding>
</hansard>