<!--The Official Report of Parliamentary Debates (Hansard) of the Legislative Council and the House of Assembly of the Parliament of South Australia are covered by parliamentary privilege. Republication by others is not afforded the same protection and may result in exposure to legal liability if the material is defamatory. You may copy and make use of excerpts of proceedings where (1) you attribute the Parliament as the source, (2) you assume the risk of liability if the manner of your use is defamatory, (3) you do not use the material for the purpose of advertising, satire or ridicule, or to misrepresent members of Parliament, and (4) your use of the extracts is fair, accurate and not misleading. Copyright in the Official Report of Parliamentary Debates is held by the Attorney-General of South Australia.-->
<hansard id="" tocId="" xml:lang="EN-AU" schemaVersion="1.0" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xml="http://www.w3.org/XML/1998/namespace" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2007/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="hansard_1_0.xsd">
  <name>House of Assembly</name>
  <date date="2015-11-17" />
  <sessionName>Fifty-Third Parliament, Second Session (53-2)</sessionName>
  <parliamentNum>53</parliamentNum>
  <sessionNum>2</sessionNum>
  <parliamentName>Parliament of South Australia</parliamentName>
  <house>House of Assembly</house>
  <venue></venue>
  <reviewStage>published</reviewStage>
  <startPage num="3425" />
  <endPage num="3563" />
  <dateModified time="2022-08-06T14:30:00+00:00" />
  <proceeding continued="true">
    <name>Question Time</name>
    <subject>
      <name>Child Protection</name>
      <text id="201511173c60dfffc9d54462b0000738">
        <heading>Child Protection</heading>
      </text>
      <talker role="member" id="4340" kind="question">
        <name>Ms SANDERSON</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">Adelaide</electorate>
        <questions>
          <question date="2015-11-17">
            <name>Child Protection</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2015-11-17T15:12:55" />
        <text id="201511173c60dfffc9d54462b0000739">
          <timeStamp time="2015-11-17T15:12:55" />
          <by role="member" id="4340">Ms SANDERSON (Adelaide) (15:12):</by>  My question is to the Minister for Education and Child Development. Can the minister assure the house that Families SA takes action on all cases in which it receives information about a drug-abusing parent under section 20(1) of the Children's Protection Act?</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="4622" kind="answer">
        <name>The Hon. S.E. CLOSE</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">Port Adelaide</electorate>
        <portfolios>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Education and Child Development</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for the Public Sector</name>
          </portfolio>
        </portfolios>
        <questions>
          <question date="2015-11-17">
            <name>Child Protection</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2015-11-17T15:13:22" />
        <text id="201511173c60dfffc9d54462b0000740">
          <timeStamp time="2015-11-17T15:13:22" />
          <by role="member" id="4622">The Hon. S.E. CLOSE (Port Adelaide—Minister for Education and Child Development, Minister for the Public Sector) (15:13):</by>  I think the question requires some attention. If we are talking about section 20(2), which refers to the drug assessment that's required, that is a question of, if it is the view that there is a risk to the child and there are drug activities occurring, then, unless the CE is otherwise satisfied that the matter is already in hand, assessment orders ought to be sought from the Youth Court.</text>
        <text id="201511173c60dfffc9d54462b0000741">If that is a correct interpretation of the question that has just been asked then, as the house will be aware, there was some criticism levelled at Families SA in the recent Coroner's report on the death of Chloe Valentine. In that, the view was expressed that that clause hadn't been adequately used and, indeed, has not separately been reported on at all previously. However, it is not the case that drug orders are not sought by Families SA. I have recently been looking at the data for those drug orders because I am interested in how we are monitoring the use of drugs.</text>
        <text id="201511173c60dfffc9d54462b0000742">So, the data that I have got at the moment refers to assessment testing and treatment orders grouped up, and there were only—well, 'only'—185 done in the 2013-14 year and in 2014-15 there were 435, so a big bump in that year, and already in the first quarter of 2015-16 we have undertaken some 259 orders, or orders have been granted, which would put us on track to hitting over 1,000. So, I think if I have correctly interpreted the question, that is the extent of my answer.</text>
      </talker>
    </subject>
  </proceeding>
</hansard>