<!--The Official Report of Parliamentary Debates (Hansard) of the Legislative Council and the House of Assembly of the Parliament of South Australia are covered by parliamentary privilege. Republication by others is not afforded the same protection and may result in exposure to legal liability if the material is defamatory. You may copy and make use of excerpts of proceedings where (1) you attribute the Parliament as the source, (2) you assume the risk of liability if the manner of your use is defamatory, (3) you do not use the material for the purpose of advertising, satire or ridicule, or to misrepresent members of Parliament, and (4) your use of the extracts is fair, accurate and not misleading. Copyright in the Official Report of Parliamentary Debates is held by the Attorney-General of South Australia.-->
<hansard id="" tocId="" xml:lang="EN-AU" schemaVersion="1.0" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xml="http://www.w3.org/XML/1998/namespace" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2007/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="hansard_1_0.xsd">
  <name>House of Assembly</name>
  <date date="2015-10-29" />
  <sessionName>Fifty-Third Parliament, Second Session (53-2)</sessionName>
  <parliamentNum>53</parliamentNum>
  <sessionNum>2</sessionNum>
  <parliamentName>Parliament of South Australia</parliamentName>
  <house>House of Assembly</house>
  <venue></venue>
  <reviewStage>published</reviewStage>
  <startPage num="3339" />
  <endPage num="3424" />
  <dateModified time="2022-08-06T14:30:00+00:00" />
  <proceeding continued="true">
    <name>Question Time</name>
    <subject>
      <name>South Australia Police</name>
      <text id="201510291872dfb7f6ae444bb0000491">
        <heading>South Australia Police</heading>
      </text>
      <talker role="member" id="1804" kind="question">
        <name>Ms CHAPMAN</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">Bragg</electorate>
        <portfolios>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Deputy Leader of the Opposition</name>
          </portfolio>
        </portfolios>
        <questions>
          <question date="2015-10-29">
            <name>South Australia Police</name>
          </question>
        </questions>
        <startTime time="2015-10-29T14:34:38" />
        <text id="201510291872dfb7f6ae444bb0000492">
          <timeStamp time="2015-10-29T14:34:38" />
          <by role="member" id="1804">Ms CHAPMAN (Bragg—Deputy Leader of the Opposition) (14:34):</by>  I will ask a supplementary, if I may. Has the minister made any inquiry as to whether the conduct I have just described constitutes criminal conduct?</text>
      </talker>
      <talker kind="speech" role="office">
        <name>The Speaker</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <page num="3376" />
        <text id="201510291872dfb7f6ae444bb0000493">
          <by role="office">The SPEAKER:</by>  I do not think the way the question has been reformulated has improved it at all. Essentially you are asking the minister to define the—</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="1804" kind="question" continued="true">
        <name>Ms CHAPMAN</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="201510291872dfb7f6ae444bb0000494">
          <by role="member" id="1804">Ms CHAPMAN:</by>  It is to whether he sought advice, sir. Obviously the Crown Solicitor's Office is available to ministers to ascertain whether there is—</text>
      </talker>
      <talker kind="speech" role="office">
        <name>The Speaker</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="201510291872dfb7f6ae444bb0000495">
          <by role="office">The SPEAKER:</by>  It would be very peculiar if the minister, having denied knowledge of it until he was contacted by <term>The Advertiser</term>, sought a legal opinion about something—</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="1804" kind="question" continued="true">
        <name>Ms CHAPMAN</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="201510291872dfb7f6ae444bb0000496">
          <by role="member" id="1804">Ms CHAPMAN:</by>  There is a possibility. He could have got on the phone to the Crown Solicitor's Office straightaway and asked, 'Have we got a problem here?' Hello, Houston. Minister, could you explain—</text>
      </talker>
      <talker kind="speech" role="office">
        <name>The Speaker</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <text id="201510291872dfb7f6ae444bb0000497">
          <by role="office">The SPEAKER:</by>  The question, improbable as it may seem, has been asked and it will now be answered.</text>
      </talker>
      <talker role="member" id="3123" kind="answer">
        <name>The Hon. A. PICCOLO</name>
        <house>House of Assembly</house>
        <electorate id="">Light</electorate>
        <portfolios>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Disabilities</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Police</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Correctional Services</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Emergency Services</name>
          </portfolio>
          <portfolio id="">
            <name>Minister for Road Safety</name>
          </portfolio>
        </portfolios>
        <startTime time="2015-10-29T14:35:39" />
        <text id="201510291872dfb7f6ae444bb0000498">
          <timeStamp time="2015-10-29T14:35:39" />
          <by role="member" id="3123">The Hon. A. PICCOLO (Light—Minister for Disabilities, Minister for Police, Minister for Correctional Services, Minister for Emergency Services, Minister for Road Safety) (14:35):</by>  Given that the matter was independently investigated by the Police Ombudsman, if the Police Ombudsman thought there were any matters of a criminal nature, the ombudsman would make some reference to that. Given that it has been dealt with as a disciplinary matter and that the police commissioner responded to it as a disciplinary matter, a person who has a statutory obligation and a statutory right to investigate the matter has done so. They can do a better job than I can in that regard because they have the powers to do so.</text>
      </talker>
    </subject>
  </proceeding>
</hansard>